0,05. Доказательная медицина от магии до поисков бессмертия

Davidson R. A. Source of funding and outcome of clinical trials // Journal of General Internal Medicine. 1986. May. Vol. 1. № 3. P. 155–158.

Medical Research Council. Clinical trial of patulin in the common cold // Lancet. 1944. September 16. Vol. 244. № 6316. P. 373–375.

Carneiro A. V. Bias in clinical studies // Revista portuguesa de cardiologia. 2011. February. Vol. 30. № 2. P. 235–242.

Raistrick H., Birkinshaw J. H., Michael S. E., Bracken A., Gye W. E. et al. Patulin in the common cold. Collaborative research on a derivative of Penicillium patulum Bainier // Lancet. 1943. November 20. Vol. 245. P. 625–635.

Stansfeld J. M., Francis A. E., Stuart-Harris C. H. Laboratory and clinical trials of patulin // Lancet. 1944. September 16. P. 370–372.

Clarke M. The 1944 patulin trial of the British Medical Research Council // Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine. 2006. September. Vol. 99. № 9. P. 478–480.

D’Arcy Hart P. A change in scientific approach: from alternation to randomised allocation in clinical trials in the 1940s // BMJ. 1999. August 28. Vol. 319. № 7209. P. 572–573.

Balabanova Y., Coker R., Fedorin I., Zakharova S., Plavinskij S., Krukov N. et al. Variability in interpretation of chest radiographs among Russian clinicians and implications for screening programmes: observational study // BMJ. 2005. August 13. Vol. 331. № 7513. P. 379–382.

Regev A., Berho M., Jeffers L. J., Milikowski C., Molina E. G. et al. Sampling error and intraobserver variation in liver biopsy in patients with chronic HCV infection // American Journal of Gastroenterology. 2002. Vol. 97. P. 2614–2618.

Cooperberg M. R., Chi T., Jad A., Cha I., Turek P. J. Variability in testis biopsy interpretation: implications for male infertility care in the era of intracytoplasmic sperm injection // Fertility and sterility. 2005. September. Vol. 84. № 3. P. 672–677.

Elmore J. G., Nelson H. D., Pepe M. S., Longton G. M. et al. Variability in pathologists’ iterpretations of individual breast biopsy slides: A population perspective // Annals of Internal Medicine. 2016. Vol. 164. № 10. P. 649–655.

Smith-Bindman R., Hosmer W. D., Caponigro M., Cunningham G. The variability in the interpretation of prenatal diagnostic ultrasound // Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology. 2001. April. Vol. 17. № 4. P. 326–332.

Mussurakis S., Buckley D. L., Coady A. M., Turnbull L. W., Horsman A. Observer variability in the interpretation of contrast enhanced MRI of the breast // The British journal of radiology. 1996. November. Vol. 69. № 827. P. 1009–1016.

Physical defects: The pathway to correction. New York: American Child Health Association 1934.

Ayanian J. Z., Berwick D. M. Do physicians have a bias toward action? A classic study revisited // Medical Decision Making. 1991. Vol. 11. № 3. P. 154–158.

Boylston Z. An account of the small-pox inoculated in New England, upon all sorts of persons, whites, blacks and of all ages and constitutions. The Second edition. London: Printed for S. Chandler. Reprinted in Boston in NE for S. Gerrism in Cornhil and T. Hancock, 1730.

Torgerson D. J., Roberts C. Randomisation methods: concealment // BMJ. 1999. August 7. Vol. 319. № 7206. P. 375–376.

Schulz K. F. Subverting randomization in controlled trials // JAMA. 1995. November 8. Vol. 274. № 18. P. 1456–1458.

Julious S. A., Mullee M. A. Confounding and Simpson’s paradox // BMJ. 1994. December. Vol. 309. № 6967. P. 1480–1481.