Читаем Анастасия или Анна? Величайшая загадка дома Романовых полностью

Анастасия или Анна? Величайшая загадка дома Романовых

1. AA to Alexei Miliukov, April 23, 1966, in Miliukov tapes.

2. Details from Ob, Berger, and personal visits by the authors.

3. Botkin, Woman Who Rose Again, 63.

4. Rathlef-Keilmann, 49; Kurth, 159; Belyakova, 224; Berliner Nachtausgabe, April 8, 1927; diary of Faith Lavington, January 31, 1927, in Hamburg, XXXIV, 6402–6428.

5. Botkin, Woman Who Rose Again, 64.

6. Botkin, Woman Who Rose Again, 48, 65; Belyakova, 41; Kournosoff, 5–7, 46, 63.

7. Botkin, Woman Who Rose Again, 65; Belyakova, 227.

8. Botkin, Woman Who Rose Again, 48, 65.

9. Belyakova, 222.

10. Botkin, Woman Who Rose Again, 45; Gilliard and Savitch, 91.

11. Kurth, 182.

12. Duke Georg of Leuchtenberg to Rathlef-Keilmann, letter of July 7, 1927, cited in Kurth, 184.

13. Kurth, 180; see diary of Faith Lavington, November 21, 1927, in Hamburg, XXXIV, 6402–6428.

14. Rathlef-Keilmann, 111–112.

15. Ibid., 117.

16. Ibid., 111–116.

17. Duke Georg of Leuchtenberg to Olga Alexandrovna, letter of August 26, 1927, in Hamburg, XIV, 2558–2559.

18. Rathlef-Keilmann, 155.

19. Duke Georg of Leuchtenberg to Andrei Vladimirovich, letter of April 17, 1927, quoted in Rathlef-Keilmann, 154.

20. Statement of Duchess Nathalia of Leuchtenberg, Baroness Meller-Zakomelsky, November 3, 1959, in Hamburg, IX, 1623–1630.

21. Statement of Duke Dimitri of Leuchtenberg, March 20, 1959, in Hamburg, VII, 1253–1261; statement of Duchess Catherine of Leuchtenberg, March 20, 1959, in Hamburg, VII, 1261–1264.

22. Maria von Hesse, quoted in Gilliard and Savitch, 141–142.

23. Kurth, 127.

24. Gilliard and Savitch, 34, 77; Berliner Nachtausgabe, April 16, 1927.

25. Rathlef-Keilmann, 232.

26. See Bonhoeffer report, March 18, 1926, in Hamburg, XIV, 2389–2402; Gilliard and Savitch, 29, 110; testimony of Anna (Thea) Chemnitz, née Malinovsky, December 17, 1958, in Hamburg, V, 979–981; Baroness Marie von Kleist, affidavit of July 5, 1929, entered into evidence May 20, 1958, in Hamburg, III, 569–574; statement of Nicholas von Schwabe, June 10, 1922, in Hamburg, XIV, 2519–2534; Nicholas von Schwabe to Gilliard, in Gilliard and Savitch, 110; Nicholas von Schwabe to Gilliard, letter of November 17, 1926, quoted in Gilliard and Savitch, 114–115; Hamburg, Summary of Evidence in Frau Anna Anderson in Unterlengenhardt v. Barbara, Herzogin Christian Ludwig zu Mecklenburg, Ludwig, Prinz von Hesse und bei Rhein, May 18, 1967, 166.

27. Rathlef-Keilmann, 232–233.

28. Dr. Karl Bonhoeffer report, March 18, 1926, in Hamburg, XIV, 2389–2402; Dr. Lothar Nobel, report of March 1926, in Hamburg, XIII, 4417–4426.

29. Dr. Theodor Eitel, report of December 22, 1926, in Hamburg, VIII, 1394–1402.

30. Testimony of Dr. Theodor Eitel, May 20, 1959, in Hamburg, VIII, 1406–1421.

31. Dr. Lothar Nobel, report of March 1926, in Hamburg, XIII, 4417–4426. This portion of Nobel’s statement, not surprisingly, was edited out before Rathlef-Keilmann published it in her book. See her reproduction of Nobel’s statement in Rathlef-Keilmann, 238–242.

32. Duke Georg of Leuchtenberg to Olga Alexandrovna, letter of August 26, 1927, in Hamburg, XIV, 2558–2559.

33. Duchess Nathalia of Leuchtenberg, Baroness Meller-Zakomelsky, letter of December 11, 1974, to Brien Horan, quoted in Horan, 139.

34. Duke Dimitri of Leuchtenberg, letter of March 5, 1961, quoted in Vorres, 239–240.

35. Duke Konstantin of Leuchtenberg, quoted in the Ottawa Citizen, December 1, 1964.

36. Testimony of Anna (Thea) Chemnitz, née Malinovsky, December 17, 1958, in Hamburg, V, 979–981; Rathlef-Keilmann, 232–233; Dr. Lothar Nobel, report of March 1926, in Hamburg, XIII, 4417–4426.

37. Statement of Rathlef-Keilmann, July 1925, in Ian Lilburn Collection.

38. This point was especially noted in the 1967 verdict of the Hanseatic Court of Appeals that reviewed Anderson’s case. See Hamburg, Summary of Evidence in Frau Anna Anderson in Unterlengenhardt v. Barbara, Herzogin Christian Ludwig zu Mecklenburg, Ludwig, Prinz von Hesse und bei Rhein, May 18, 1967, 217.

39. Dr. Ludwig Berg, statement of May 10, 1929, cited in Kurth, 86.

40. Affidavit of Tatiana Botkin, May 2, 1929, in Hamburg, Bln I, 113–127; testimony of Dr. Theodor Eitel, May 20, 1959, in Hamburg, VIII, 1410.

41. Duke Georg of Leuchtenberg to Olga Alexandrovna, letter of August 26, 1927, in Hamburg, XIV, 2558–2559; diary of Faith Lavington, September 26, 1927, in Hamburg, XXXIV, 6402–6428.

42. See Rathlef-Keilmann, notes of June 30, 1925, in Hamburg, Bln III, loose.

43. Franz Jaenicke, statement of February 27, 1956, in Ian Lilburn collection; Dr. Serge Rudnev, report of March 1926, in Hamburg, XIV, 2485–2488; Rudnev affidavit of July 18, 1938, in Hamburg, Bln I, 134–138.

44. Agnes Gallagher, affidavit of December 22, 1930, in Hamburg, XXIV, 4481–4493.

45. Statement of Serge Botkin, March 1929, in Ian Lilburn Collection.

46. Auclères, 16.

47. Cited in Kurth, 131.

48. Baron Osten-Sacken to Serge Botkin, letter of June 29, 1926, in Ian Lilburn Collection.

49. Dr. Theodor Eitel, report of December 22, 1926, in Hamburg, VIII, 1394–1402.

50. See diary of Vera von Klemenz, August 21, 1927, in Rathlef-Keilmann, 168; affidavit of Agnes Gallagher, December 22, 1930, in Hamburg, XXIV, 4481–4493.

51. Duke Georg of Leuchtenberg to Olga Alexandrovna, letter of August 26, 1927, in Hamburg, XIV, 2552–2557.

52. Diary of Faith Lavington, September 19, 1927, in Hamburg, XXXIV, 6402–6428.

53. Ibid. September 26, 1927.

54. Ibid., November 15, 1927.

55. Ibid.

56. Agnes Wasserschleben, notes of July 28, 1929, in Hamburg, IV, 1017–1024.

57. Diary and notes of Vera von Klemenz, June 17, 1927, in Rathlef-Keilmann, 161.

58. Ibid., June 23, 1927, in Rathlef-Keilmann, 161–162.

59. Ibid., June 24, 1927, in Rathlef-Keilmann, 163.

60. Ibid., July 17, 1927, in Rathlef-Keilmann, 164.

61. Botkin, Woman Who Rose Again, 309.

62. Ibid., 69.