Читаем Английский язык с Крестным Отцом полностью

gambling and other things would refuse to help us in drugs. So to ask me to perform a

service in these matters is to ask me to do a disservice to myself. But I'm willing to do

even that if all of you think it proper in order to adjust other matters."

When Don Corleone had finished speaking the room became much more relaxed with

more whisperings and cross talk. He had conceded (to concede – уступать; допускать

/возможность, правильность чего-либо/ [k∂n'si:d]) the important point. He would offer

his protection to any organized business venture in drugs. He was, in effect, agreeing

almost entirely to Sollozzo's original proposal if that proposal was endorsed (to endorse

[ın’do:s] – расписываться на обороте документа; подтверждать, одобрять) by the

national group gathered here. It was understood that he would never participate in the

operational phase, nor would he invest his money. He would merely use his protective

influence with the legal apparatus. But this was a formidable concession.

The Don of Los Angeles, Frank Falcone, spoke to answer. "There's no way of

stopping our people from going into that business. They go in on their own and they get

in trouble. There's too much money in it to resist. So it's more dangerous if we don't go

in. At least if we control it we can cover it better, organize it better, make sure it causes

less trouble. Being in it is not so bad, there has to be control, there has to be protection,

119

there has to be organization, we can't have everybody running around doing just what

they please like a bunch of anarchists."

The Don of Detroit, more friendly to Corleone than any of the others, also now spoke

against his friend's position, in the interest of reasonableness. "I don't believe in drugs,"

he said. "For years I paid my people extra so they wouldn't do that kind of business. But

it didn't matter, it didn't help. Somebody comes to them and says, 'I have powders, if

you put up the three-, four-thousand-dollar investment we can make fifty thousand

distributing.' Who can resist such a profit? And they are so busy with their little side

business they neglect the work I pay them to do. There's more money in drugs. It's

getting bigger all the time. There's no way to stop it so we have to control the business

and keep it respectable. I don't want any of it near schools, I don't want any of it sold to

children. That is an infamita. In my city I would try to keep the traffic in the dark people,

the colored. They are the best customers, the least troublesome and they are animals

anyway. They have no respect for their wives or their families or for themselves. Let

them lose their souls with drugs. But something has to be done, we just can't let people

do as they please and make trouble for everyone."

This speech of the Detroit Don was received with loud murmurs of approval. He had

hit the nail on the head. You couldn't even pay people to stay out of the drug traffic. As

for his remarks about children, that was his well-known sensibility, his

tenderheartedness speaking. After all, who would sell drugs to children? Where would

children get the money? As for his remarks about the coloreds, that was not even heard.

The Negroes were considered of absolutely no account, of no force whatsoever. That

they had allowed society to grind them into the dust proved them of no account and his

mentioning them in any way proved that the Don of Detroit had a mind that always

wavered (to waver – колебаться, колыхаться, развеваться) toward irrelevancies

(irrelevance – неуместность [ı'relıv∂ns]).

All the Dons spoke. All of them deplored the traffic in drugs as a bad thing that would

cause trouble but agreed there was no way to control it. There was, simply, too much

money to be made in the business, therefore it followed that there would be men who

would dare anything to dabble (плескаться, барахтаться; заниматься чем-либо

поверхностно) in it. That was human nature.

It was finally agreed. Drug traffic would be permitted and Don Corleone must give it

some legal protection in the East. It was understood that the Barzini and Tattaglia

Families would do most of the large-scale operations. With this out of the way the

conference was able to move on to other matters of a wider interest. There were many



complex problems to be solved. It was agreed that Las Vegas and Miami were to be

open cities where any of the Families could operate. They all recognized that these

120

were the cities of the future. It was also agreed that no violence would be permitted in

these cities and that petty (мелкий, незначительный) criminals of all types were to be

discouraged. It was agreed that in momentous affairs, in executions that were

necessary but might cause too much of a public outcry, the execution must be approved

by this council. It was agreed that button men and other soldiers were to be restrained

from violent crimes and acts of vengeance against each other on personal matters. It

was agreed that Families would do each other services when requested, such as

Перейти на страницу:

Все книги серии Метод чтения Ильи Франка [Английский язык]

Похожие книги

История русской литературы второй половины XX века. Том II. 1953–1993. В авторской редакции
История русской литературы второй половины XX века. Том II. 1953–1993. В авторской редакции

Во второй половине ХХ века русская литература шла своим драматическим путём, преодолевая жесткий идеологический контроль цензуры и партийных структур. В 1953 году писательские организации начали подготовку ко II съезду Союза писателей СССР, в газетах и журналах публиковались установочные статьи о социалистическом реализме, о положительном герое, о роли писателей в строительстве нового процветающего общества. Накануне съезда М. Шолохов представил 126 страниц романа «Поднятая целина» Д. Шепилову, который счёл, что «главы густо насыщены натуралистическими сценами и даже явно эротическими моментами», и сообщил об этом Хрущёву. Отправив главы на доработку, два партийных чиновника по-своему решили творческий вопрос. II съезд советских писателей (1954) проходил под строгим контролем сотрудников ЦК КПСС, лишь однажды прозвучала яркая речь М.А. Шолохова. По указанию высших ревнителей чистоты идеологии с критикой М. Шолохова выступил Ф. Гладков, вслед за ним – прозападные либералы. В тот период бушевала полемика вокруг романов В. Гроссмана «Жизнь и судьба», Б. Пастернака «Доктор Живаго», В. Дудинцева «Не хлебом единым», произведений А. Солженицына, развернулись дискуссии между журналами «Новый мир» и «Октябрь», а затем между журналами «Молодая гвардия» и «Новый мир». Итогом стала добровольная отставка Л. Соболева, председателя Союза писателей России, написавшего в президиум ЦК КПСС о том, что он не в силах победить антирусскую группу писателей: «Эта возня живо напоминает давние рапповские времена, когда искусство «организовать собрание», «подготовить выборы», «провести резолюцию» было доведено до совершенства, включительно до тщательного распределения ролей: кому, когда, где и о чём именно говорить. Противопоставить современным мастерам закулисной борьбы мы ничего не можем. У нас нет ни опыта, ни испытанных ораторов, и войско наше рассеяно по всему простору России, его не соберешь ни в Переделкине, ни в Малеевке для разработки «сценария» съезда, плановой таблицы и раздачи заданий» (Источник. 1998. № 3. С. 104). А со страниц журналов и книг к читателям приходили прекрасные произведения русских писателей, таких как Михаил Шолохов, Анна Ахматова, Борис Пастернак (сборники стихов), Александр Твардовский, Евгений Носов, Константин Воробьёв, Василий Белов, Виктор Астафьев, Аркадий Савеличев, Владимир Личутин, Николай Рубцов, Николай Тряпкин, Владимир Соколов, Юрий Кузнецов…Издание включает обзоры литературы нескольких десятилетий, литературные портреты.

Виктор Васильевич Петелин

Культурология / История / Языкознание, иностранные языки / Языкознание / Образование и наука