Names and Numbers. ICANN manages
Internet protocol numbers and
namespaces, coordinating the translation
of
address 93.184.216.119 for connection
across the Internet.
Blockchain technology simultaneously
highlights the issue of the appropriate
administration of transnational public
goods and presents a solution.
Wikipedia is a similar transnational
public good that is currently subject to a
local jurisdiction that could impose on
the organization an artificial or biased
agenda. It is possible that blockchain
mechanisms might be the most efficient
and equitable models for administering
all transnational public goods,
particularly due to their participative,
democratic, and distributed nature.
A notable case in which jurisdictional
nation-state entities were able to effect
centralized and biased control is
WikiLeaks. In the Edward Snowden
whistle-blowing case in 2010,
individuals were trying to make
financial contributions in support of the
WikiLeaks organization but, strongarmed
by centralized government agendas,
credit card payment networks and
PayPal, refused to accept such
contributions, and WikiLeaks was
effectively embargoed. 75 Bitcoin
contributions, had they been possible at
the time, would have been direct, and
possibly produced a different outcome.
The Electronic Freedom Foundation
(EFF), a nonprofit organization that
supports personal freedoms, and other
related organizations are similarly
located in jurisdictional locations at
present, which could always mean the
operation of curtailed agendas if
authorities were to exercise influence
over the organization and individuals
involved.
Namecoin: Decentralized
Domain Name System
One of the first noncurrency uses of
blockchain technology was to prevent
Internet censorship with Namecoin, an
altcoin that can be used to verify Domain
Name System (DNS) registrations.
Namecoin is an alternative DNS that is
transnational and cannot be controlled
by any government or corporation. The
benefit of a decentralized DNS is that it
makes it possible for anyone worldwide
who might be otherwise suppressed or
censored to publish information freely in
the Internet.
Just as Bitcoin is a decentralized
currency that cannot be shut down,
Namecoin is the basis for a
decentralized DNS (i.e., web URLs). 76
The idea is that URLs permanently
embedded in the blockchain would be
resistant to the government seizing of
domains. The censorship issue is that in
a URL such as
authorities control the top-level domain,
the
controls
potentially seize and redirect the URL.
Centralized authorities control all top-
level domains; for example, China
controls all
decentralized DNS means that top-level
domains can exist that are not controlled
by anyone, and they have DNS lookup
tables shared on a peer-to-peer network.
As long as there are volunteers running
the decentralized DNS server software,
alternative domains registered in this
system can be accessed. Authorities
cannot impose rules to affect the
operation of a well-designed and
executed global peer-to-peer top-level
domain. The same Bitcoin structure is
used in the implementation of a separate
blockchain and coin, Namecoin, for
decentralized DNS.
Namecoin is not at present intended for
the registration of all domains, but as a
free speech mechanism for domains that
might be sensitive to censorship (for
example, in countries with limited
political freedom). The top-level
domain for Namecoin is
parties register
Namecoin. The actions necessary to
register a new domain or to update an
existing one are built in to the Namecoin
protocol, based on transaction type—for
example, the “name_new” transaction at
a cost of 0.01 NMC (Namecoin is
convertible in/out of Bitcoin). Domains
can be registered directly with the
Namecoin system or via a registration
service like
Because the top-level domain
outside the traditional operation of the
Internet, to facilitate viewing
websites, there are
handle DNS requests in a browser, as
well as Firefox and Chrome extensions.
According to the Bitcoin Contact
website as of October 2014, there are
178,397
including, for example,
The key point is that
free-speech mechanism, because now
having the ability to view
means attempts to silence those with a
legitimate message will have less of a
chance of succeeding. Just as there are
benefits to having decentralized currency
transactions, there are benefits to having
many other kinds of decentralized
transactions.
Challenges and Other
Decentralized DNS Services
Technical issues were found with the
Namecoin implementation that left
domains vulnerable to takeover (a bug
that made it possible to update values if
the transaction input name matched the
transaction output name, as well as new
registrations to be overridden).77