Что там – за словом? Вопросы интерфейсной теории значения слова

86. Rosenzweig, M.R. International Kent-Rosanoff word association norms, emphasizing those of French male and female students and French workmen // Postman, L. & Keppel, G. (Eds.). Norms of Word Association. – New York; London:: Academic Press, 1970.

87. Russell, W.A. The complete German language norms for responses to 100 words from the Kent–Rosanoff word association test // Postman, L. & Keppel, G. (Eds.). Norms of Word Association. – New York; London: Academic Press, 1970. – Pp. 53–94.

88. Russell, W.A. & Jenkins, J.J. The complete Minnesota norms for responses to 100 words from the Kent–Rosanoff word association test: Technical Report No.11. – University of Minnesota, 1954.

89. Russell, W.A. & Meseck, O. Der Einfluss der Assoziation auf das Erinnern von Worten in der deutschen, franzõsischen und englischen Sprache // Zeitschrift für Expereimentelle und Angewandte Psychologie. – 1959. – Vol. 6. – Pp. 191–211.

90. Ruts, W., De Deyne, S., Ameel, E., Vanpaemel, W., Verbeemen, T. & Storms, G. Dutch norm data for 13 semantic categories and 338 exemplars // Behavior Research Methods, Instruments & Computers. – 2004. – Vol. 36. – Pp. 506–515.

91. Schulte im Walde, S., Melinger, A., Roth, M., & Weber, A. An empirical characterization of response types in German Association Norms // Research on Language and Computation. – 2008. – Pp.1–38.

92. Snodgrass, J.G., & Vanderwart, M. A Standardized Set of 200 Pictures: Norms for Name Agreement, Image Agreement, Familiarity, and Visual Complexity // Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory. – 1980. – Vol.6. – Pp. 174–215.

93. Stadthagen-Gonzales, H. & Davis, C.J. The Bristol Norms for Age of Acquisition, Imageability, and Familiarity // Behavior Research Methods. – 2006. – Vol. 38. – Pp. 598–605 [Электронный ресурс].

94. Stamou, S. et al. BalkanNet: A Multilingual Semantic Network for the Balkan Languages // Proceedings of the 1^st International Global WordNet Conference (January 21–25, 2002). – Mysore, India, 2002. – Pp. 12–14. http://www.ceid. upatras.gr/Balkanet/

95. Stevenson, R.A., Mikels, J.A., & James, T.W. Characterization of the Affective Norms for English Words by discrete emotional categories // Behavior Research Methods. – 2007. – Vol. 39. – Pp. 1020–1024

96. Storms, G. Flemish category norms for exemplars of 39 categories: A replication of the Battig and Montague (1969) category norms: PET studies // Brain. – 2001. – Vol. 124. – Pp. 1619–1634.

97. Toglia, M.P. & Battig, W.F. Handbook of Semantic Word Norms. – Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum, 1978. – 148 p.

98. Twilley, L.C., Dixon, P., Taylor, D., & Clark, K. University of Alberta norms of relative meaning frequency for 566 homographs // Memory and Cognition. – 1994. – Vol. 22. – Pp.11–126.

99. Vinson, D., & Vigliocco, G. Semantic feature production norms for a large set of objects and events // Behavior Research Methods. – 2008. – Vol. 40. – Pp. 183–190.

100. Vossen, P. (Ed.). EuroWordNet: A Multilingual Database with Lexical Semantic Network. – Dordrecht: Kluwer, 1998.

101. Vό, M.L. – H., Jacobs, A.M., & Conrad, M. Cross-validating the Berlin Affective Word List // Behavior Research Methods. – 2006. – Vol. 38. – Pp. 606–609.

102. Wollen, K.A., Cox, S.D., Coahran, M.M., Shea, D.S., & Kirby, R.F. Frequency of occurrence and concreteness ratings of homograph meanings // Behavior Research Methods, Instruments & Computers. – 1980. – Vol. 12. – Pp.8–15.