Читаем Conservatives Without Conscience полностью

While the majority of the “syndromes” set forth by Burnham have remained constant during the past half century, in a surprising number of instances conservatives and liberals have changed places (the positions described in numbers 7, 8, 12, and 13), and in others their differences are not as significant as when Burnham catalogued them (the positions described in numbers 1, 3, 4, and 5).

<p>APPENDIX B</p><p>Right-Wing Authoritarian Survey</p><p>The Right-Wing Authoritarianism Scale<a l:href="#ast_57" type="note">[*]</a></p>

Note: In including this scale with Bob Altemeyer’s permission, I agreed not to include the full procedure for scoring. In one of our exchanges he told me that “because people tend to believe their own psychological test scores far, far more than they should, my profession discourages letting people know what they have scored on a test.” He also noted that “when people know they are answering an authoritarianism measure, that can affect how they respond—which is another reason for treating individual scores with a grain of salt.” Nonetheless, a reader can get a good sense of where he or she might fall in the world of RWAs from a review of the following questions. This scale is one of several developed by Altemeyer. His current scale has just twenty questions, and he has found it as effective as this thirty-two-question scale.

1. The established authorities generally turn out to be right about things, while the radicals and protesters are usually just “loudmouths” showing off their ignorance.

2. Women should have to promise to obey their husbands when they get married.

3. Our country desperately needs a mighty leader who will do what has to be done to destroy the radical new ways and sinfulness that are ruining us.

4. Gays and lesbians are just as healthy and moral as anybody else.

5. It is always better to trust the judgment of the proper authorities in government and religion than to listen to the noisy rabble-rousers in our society, who are trying to create doubt in people’s minds.

6. Atheists and others who have rebelled against the established religions are no doubt every bit as good and virtuous as those who attend church regularly.

7. The only way our country can get through the crisis ahead is to get back to our traditional values, put some tough leaders in power, and silence the troublemakers spreading bad ideas.

8. There is absolutely nothing wrong with nudist camps.

9. Our country needs free thinkers who will have the courage to defy traditional ways, even if this upsets many people.

10. Our country will be destroyed someday if we do not smash the perversions eating away at our moral fiber and traditional beliefs.

11. Everyone should have their own lifestyle, religious beliefs, and sexual preferences, even if it makes them different from everyone else.

12. The “old-fashioned ways’” and “old-fashioned values” still show the best way to live.

13. You have to admire those who challenged the law and the majority’s view by protesting for women’s abortion rights, for animal rights, or to abolish school prayer.

14. What our country really needs is a strong, determined leader who will crush evil and take us back to our true path.

15. Some of the best people in our country are those who are challenging our government, criticizing religion, and ignoring the “normal way things are supposed to be done.”

16. God’s laws about abortion, pornography, and marriage must be strictly followed before it is too late, and those who break them must be strongly punished.

17. It would be best for everyone if the proper authorities censored magazines so that people could not get their hands on trashy and disgusting material.

18. There is nothing wrong with premarital sexual intercourse.

19. Our country will be great if we honor the ways of our forefathers, do what the authorities tell us to do, and get rid of the “rotten apples” who are ruining everything.

20. There is no “ONE right way” to live life; everybody has to create their own way.

21. Homosexuals and feminists should be praised for being brave enough to defy “traditional family values.”

22. This country would work a lot better if certain groups of troublemakers would just shut up and accept their group’s traditional place in society.

23. There are many radical, immoral people in our country today who are trying to ruin it for their own godless purposes, whom the authorities should put out of action.

24. People should pay less attention to the Bible and the other old forms of religious guidance, and instead develop their own personal standards of what is moral and immoral.

25. What our country needs most is discipline, with everyone following our leaders in unity.

26. It’s better to have trashy magazines and radical pamphlets in our communities than to let the government have the power to censor them.

Перейти на страницу:

Похожие книги

… Para bellum!
… Para bellum!

* Почему первый японский авианосец, потопленный во Вторую мировую войну, был потоплен советскими лётчиками?* Какую территорию хотела захватить у СССР Финляндия в ходе «зимней» войны 1939—1940 гг.?* Почему в 1939 г. Гитлер напал на своего союзника – Польшу?* Почему Гитлер решил воевать с Великобританией не на Британских островах, а в Африке?* Почему в начале войны 20 тыс. советских танков и 20 тыс. самолётов не смогли задержать немецкие войска с их 3,6 тыс. танков и 3,6 тыс. самолётов?* Почему немцы свои пехотные полки вооружали не «современной» артиллерией, а орудиями, сконструированными в Первую мировую войну?* Почему в 1940 г. немцы демоторизовали (убрали автомобили, заменив их лошадьми) все свои пехотные дивизии?* Почему в немецких танковых корпусах той войны танков было меньше, чем в современных стрелковых корпусах России?* Почему немцы вооружали свои танки маломощными пушками?* Почему немцы самоходно-артиллерийских установок строили больше, чем танков?* Почему Вторая мировая война была не войной моторов, а войной огня?* Почему в конце 1942 г. 6-я армия Паулюса, окружённая под Сталинградом не пробовала прорвать кольцо окружения и дала себя добить?* Почему «лучший ас» Второй мировой войны Э. Хартманн практически никогда не атаковал бомбардировщики?* Почему Западный особый военный округ не привёл войска в боевую готовность вопреки приказу генштаба от 18 июня 1941 г.?Ответы на эти и на многие другие вопросы вы найдёте в этой, на сегодня уникальной, книге по истории Второй мировой войны.

Андрей Петрович Паршев , Владимир Иванович Алексеенко , Георгий Афанасьевич Литвин , Юрий Игнатьевич Мухин

Публицистика / История
Дальний остров
Дальний остров

Джонатан Франзен — популярный американский писатель, автор многочисленных книг и эссе. Его роман «Поправки» (2001) имел невероятный успех и завоевал национальную литературную премию «National Book Award» и награду «James Tait Black Memorial Prize». В 2002 году Франзен номинировался на Пулитцеровскую премию. Второй бестселлер Франзена «Свобода» (2011) критики почти единогласно провозгласили первым большим романом XXI века, достойным ответом литературы на вызов 11 сентября и возвращением надежды на то, что жанр романа не умер. Значительное место в творчестве писателя занимают также эссе и мемуары. В книге «Дальний остров» представлены очерки, опубликованные Франзеном в период 2002–2011 гг. Эти тексты — своего рода апология чтения, размышления автора о месте литературы среди ценностей современного общества, а также яркие воспоминания детства и юности.

Джонатан Франзен

Публицистика / Критика / Документальное