The second episode of «Magnúss saga góða ok Haralds hardráða», the stay of Magnus in Rus’, is also constructed as a combination of several traditional motifs. He is said to occupy a honorary position at Jaroslav’s court, to succeed in sports and war games, and to kill his off ender after a quarrel at a banquet. These characteristics belong to the stereotype description of a
The third episode, containing the information about a possible trade treaty, and the fourth episode, diff er from the preceding two in their lack of situational stereotypes. They are devoted to the events directly connected with the return of Magnus to Norway. According to «Magnúss saga góða ok Haralds hardráða» as well as other sagas including «Heimskringla» Magnus’s inthronization in 1036 was prepared by a common resentment of Danish rule in Norway. Snorri elaborated the theme of Danish suppression in Norway and provided a long list of laws introduced by Svein which aroused special anger of the Norwegians. He also stressed personal dissatisfaction of Einar Thambarskelfi r and Kalf Arnason who were later deceived by Knut.
«Morkinskinna» premises the retelling about the embassy of Kalf and Einar with a narration about a voyage of two brothers Karl and Björn. In spite of the absence of peace (
The narration about Jaroslav’s participation in the restoration of Norwegian supremacy attracted attention of specialists in Old Russian history who viewed it as a testimony of Jaroslav’s active policy in the Baltic (Grekov et al.). However, E. A. Rydzevskaja, a prominent Russian specialist in Old Norse sources for Russian history, severely rejected the very possibility of using this episode in historical studies. She wrote, «… saga researchers have established long ago that the interference of Jaroslav was an invention of the compiler of “Morkinskinna” The fact that this role is attributed to a Russian prince, is certainly not devoid of interest and importance, but all the same, it is not a historical fact»[1254]
. Her verdict put an end to using this episode for historical purposes. Nevertheless, Rydzevskaja’s estimation of this episode was not based on a special study, neither was it discussed against a background of politics in the Baltic Sea area and the activities of Jaroslav at that time.