Читаем Everyone Loses: The Ukraine Crisis and the Ruinous Contest for Post-Soviet Eurasia полностью

Another geo-ideational conflict was brewing. Bush said in his June 2001 speech that it was not just immoral to find common ground with Russia on the regional order, as per the ‘no more Yaltas’ maxim; additionally, the president reinterpreted ‘what my father called a Europe whole and free’ as a concrete policy agenda. ‘All of Europe’s new democracies, from the Baltic to the Black Sea and all that lie between, should have the same chance for security and freedom and the same chance to join the institutions of Europe as Europe’s old democracies have.’ Suddenly, for the continent to be ‘whole and free’ (for good measure, ‘at peace’ soon became part of the trope), every country had to join the Western club. To be precise, every country save one: ‘Europe’s great institutions – NATO and the European Union – can and should build partnerships with Russia’, but not more than that.[40] As Russia gained seriousness of purpose about its regional-integration agenda, thus giving the In-Betweens alternative club membership options, the geo-idea of a ‘Europe whole, free and at peace’ began to collide with the other Western favourite: freedom to choose. If a country were to choose to join a Russia-led club, presumably Europe would not be whole or free, and maybe not even at peace.

A frozen conflict heats up

As the politicians huddled in Bucharest, the security situation in the South Caucasus was going downhill. In the weeks following the recognition of Kosovo’s independence, Moscow publicly reached out to the small, unrecognised breakaway entities within Georgia, South Ossetia and Abkhazia, seemingly in order to demonstrate its pique at the Kosovo decision. Between early March and mid-April, the government announced it would no longer be bound by a 1996 CIS decision limiting trade with Abkhazia; the Duma passed a non-binding resolution calling for recognition of the enclaves’ independence; and Putin issued a decree opening up greater trade, transportation and political links with both places. These steps were primarily symbolic; the CIS sanctions had never been enforced, and links between Russia and the two separatist regions had always existed. But they caused panic in Tbilisi, leading many there to assume that Russia was marching toward annexation.[41]

The Georgian government responded by bolstering its military presence near Abkhazia and conducting more drone flights over the region. In hectic succession, a Russian MiG-29 shot down several drones, there was a rancorous UN Security Council meeting on the issue and Russia boosted its peacekeeping forces in Abkhazia. Communication had broken down, and political will to defuse the situation was absent. When the chief of the Russian general staff warned his NATO counterparts in May that there would be a war in Georgia that summer unless steps were taken to nip it in the bud, ‘NATO thought it was just standard Russian bluster and political posturing’.[42]

As the summer arrived, South Ossetia became the eye of the storm, with numerous skirmishes between Georgian and separatist forces, while Russia conducted a 10,000-man military exercise just across the border, ending on 2 August. What came next has been well documented by an international fact-finding mission on the conflict.[43] Following an intensification of fighting, on the night of 7 August Saakashvili took the fateful decision to unleash an all-out assault on Tskhinvali, the South Ossetian provincial capital. The Russian peacekeepers there also came under direct attack. Russia, after being caught flat-footed, launched a massive counter-offensive, not only driving the Georgians (both armed forces and ethnic Georgian civilians) out of South Ossetia but pushing deep into Tbilisi-governed territory, gratuitously sinking several of Georgia’s naval vessels after the fighting had ended (and hauling off patrol boats as trophies), and destroying much of the hardware of the country’s ground forces. Russian forces also invaded across the administrative boundary with Abkhazia, which Georgia had not attacked, and dismantled or destroyed a number of military facilities. In five days, the war was over; Saakashvili had been routed. An estimated 500 people had been killed, and tens of thousands had been displaced. On 26 August, the recently instated Russian president, Dmitry Medvedev, recognised the independence of South Ossetia and Abkhazia.

Перейти на страницу:

Все книги серии Adelphi

Похожие книги

История последних политических переворотов в государстве Великого Могола
История последних политических переворотов в государстве Великого Могола

Франсуа Бернье (1620–1688) – французский философ, врач и путешественник, проживший в Индии почти 9 лет (1659–1667). Занимая должность врача при дворе правителя Индии – Великого Могола Ауранзеба, он получил возможность обстоятельно ознакомиться с общественными порядками и бытом этой страны. В вышедшей впервые в 1670–1671 гг. в Париже книге он рисует картину войны за власть, развернувшуюся во время болезни прежнего Великого Могола – Шах-Джахана между четырьмя его сыновьями и завершившуюся победой Аурангзеба. Но самое важное, Ф. Бернье в своей книге впервые показал коренное, качественное отличие общественного строя не только Индии, но и других стран Востока, где он тоже побывал (Сирия, Палестина, Египет, Аравия, Персия) от тех социальных порядков, которые существовали в Европе и в античную эпоху, и в Средние века, и в Новое время. Таким образом, им фактически был открыт иной, чем античный (рабовладельческий), феодальный и капиталистический способы производства, антагонистический способ производства, который в дальнейшем получил название «азиатского», и тем самым выделен новый, четвёртый основной тип классового общества – «азиатское» или «восточное» общество. Появлением книги Ф. Бернье было положено начало обсуждению в исторической и философской науке проблемы «азиатского» способа производства и «восточного» общества, которое не закончилось и до сих пор. Подробный обзор этой дискуссии дан во вступительной статье к данному изданию этой выдающейся книги.Настоящее издание труда Ф. Бернье в отличие от первого русского издания 1936 г. является полным. Пропущенные разделы впервые переведены на русский язык Ю. А. Муравьёвым. Книга выходит под редакцией, с новой вступительной статьей и примечаниями Ю. И. Семёнова.

Франсуа Бернье

Приключения / Экономика / История / Путешествия и география / Финансы и бизнес