Читаем GettingThings Done. The Art of Stress-Free Productivity полностью

Too many discussions end with only a vague sense that people know what they have decided and are going to do. But without a clear conclusion that there is a next action, much less what it is or who's got it, more often than not a lot of "stuff" gets left up in the air.

I am frequently asked to facilitate meetings. I've learned the hard way that no matter where we are in the conversation, twenty minutes before the agreed end-time of the discussion I must force the question: "So what's the next action here?" In my experience, there is usually twenty minutes' worth of clarifying (and some-times tough decisions) still required to come up with an answer.

This is radical common sense—radical because it often compels discussion at deeper levels than people are comfortable with. "Are we serious about this?" "Do we really know what we're doing here?" "Are we really ready to allocate precious time and resources to this?" It's very easy to avoid these more relevant levels of thinking. What prevents those issues from slipping away into amorphous "stuff" is forcing the decision about the next action. Some further conversation, exploration, deliberation, and negotiation are often needed to put the topic to rest. The world is too unpredictable these days to permit assumptions about outcomes: we need to take responsibility for moving things to clarity.

Talk does not cook rice.

— Chinese

You have to have some experience of this to really know what I mean here. If you do, you're probably saying to yourself, "Yes!" If you're not sure what I'm talking about, I suggest that in your next meeting with anyone, you end the conversation with the question, "So what's the next action here?" Then notice what happens.

Accountability

The dark side of "collaborative cultures" is the allergy they foster to holding anyone responsible for having the ball. "Mine or yours?" is unfortunately not in the common vocabulary of many such organizations. There is a sense that that would be impolite. "We're all in this together" is a worthy sentiment, but seldom a reality in the hard-nosed day-to-day world of work. Too many meetings end with a vague feeling among the players that something ought to happen, and the hope that it's not their personal job to make it so.

The way I see it, what's truly impolite is allowing people to walk away from discussions unclear. Real "togetherness" of a group is reflected by the responsibility that all take for defining the real things to do and the specific people assigned to do them, so everyone is freed of the angst of still-undecided actions.

Again, if you've been there, you'll know what I'm talking about. If you haven't, test it out—take a small risk and ask "So what's the next action on this?" at the end of each discussion point in your next staff meeting, or in your next "family conversation" around the dinner table.

Productivity

Organizations naturally become more productive when they model and train front-end next-action decision-making. For all the reasons mentioned above, determining the required physical

allocation of resources necessary to make something happen as soon as the outcome has been clarified will produce more results sooner, and with less effort.

Learning to break through the barriers of the sophisticated creative thinking that can freeze activity—that is, the entangled psychic webs we spin—is a superior skill. "Productivity" has been touted for decades as a desirable thing to improve in organizations. Anything that can help maximize output will do that. But in the world of knowledge work, all the computers and telecom improvements and leadership seminars on the planet will make no difference in this regard unless the individuals involved increase their operational responsiveness. And that requires thinking about something that lands in your world before you have to. One of the biggest productivity leaks I have seen in some organizations is the lack of next actions determined for "long-term" projects. "Long-term" does not mean "Someday/Maybe."

Those projects with distant goal lines are still to be done as soon as possible; "long-term" simply means, "more action steps until it's done," not "no need to decide next actions because the day of reckoning is so far away." When every project and open loop in an organization is being monitored, it's a whole new ball game.

Productivity will improve only when individuals increase their operational responsiveness. And in knowledge work, that means clarifying actions on the front end instead of the back.

Empowerment

Perhaps the greatest benefit of adopting the next-action approach is that it dramatically increases your ability to make things happen, with a concomitant rise in your self-esteem and constructive outlook.

Перейти на страницу:

Похожие книги

Практика управления человеческими ресурсами
Практика управления человеческими ресурсами

В книге всемирно известного ученого дан подробный обзор теоретических и практических основ управления человеческими ресурсами. В числе прочих рассмотрены такие вопросы, как процесс управления ЧР; работа и занятость; организационное поведение; обеспечение организации управления трудовыми ресурсами; управление показателями труда; вознаграждение.В десятом издании материал многих глав переработан и дополнен. Это обусловлено значительным развитием УЧР: созданием теории и практики управления человеческим капиталом, повышенным вниманием к роли работников «передней линии», к вопросам разработки и внедрения стратегий УЧР, к обучению и развитию персонала. Все эти темы рассмотрены в новых или существенно переработанных главах. Также в книге приведено много реальных примеров из практики бизнеса.Адресовано слушателям программ МВА, аспирантам, студентам старших курсов, обучающимся по управленческим специальностям, а также профессиональным менеджерам и специалистам по управлению человеческими ресурсами.

Майкл Армстронг

Деловая литература / Деловая литература / Управление, подбор персонала / Финансы и бизнес
Наемные работники: подчинить и приручить
Наемные работники: подчинить и приручить

Сергей Занин — предприниматель, бизнес-тренер и консультант с многолетним опытом. Руководитель Пражской школы бизнеса, автор популярных книг «Бизнес-притчи», «Как преодолеть лень, или Как научиться делать то, что нужно делать», «Деньги. Как заработать и не потерять».Благодаря его книгам и тренингам тысячи людей разобрались в собственных амбициях, целях и трудностях, превратили размытые желания «сделать карьеру», «стать успешным», «обеспечить семью», «реализовать себя» в ясную программу последовательных действий.В новой книге С. Занина вы найдете ответы на вопросы:Почему благие намерения хозяев вызывают сопротивление персонала?Как сократить срок окупаемости работников?Почему кнут эффективнее пряника?Как платить словами вместо денег?Есть ли смысл в программах «командостроительства»?Чем заняты работники, когда их не видит хозяин?Как работники используют слабости хозяина?Почему владелец бизнеса всегда умнее своих работников?К какому типу хозяина или работника вы относитесь?Суждения, высказанные в книге, могут вызвать как полное одобрение, так и неприязнь к автору. Это зависит от того, кем сегодня является читатель — наемным сотрудником или владельцем бизнеса.Сайт Сергея Занина — www.zanin.ru

Сергей Геннадьевич Занин , Сергей Занин

Деловая литература / Карьера, кадры / Маркетинг, PR / Управление, подбор персонала / Финансы и бизнес