He sounded like a book, with his rounded sentences and his careful ordering of ideas. But they were fuzzy, muddy ideas compared to the crisp architecture of the law.
Marcus Aurelius startled her with a disarmingly boyish grin. “Oh, indeed, Alexander did not err when he sent you to me,” he said. “You have a great natural aptitude for a profession of which you must hitherto have been altogether ignorant.”
Nicole drew breath to object to that, but a belated attack of sense kept her silent. There was no way she could explain how she really knew about the law. Let him think her a prodigy, if it got her what she wanted.
She hadn’t diverted him from his line of thought, either. He veered right back to it with a quiet obstinacy that would have served him well on the tenure track at a university. “A soldier, like any other man,” he said, “is obliged to live according to that which is ethically right.”
Nicole pounced with a cry of glee. “Ha! How can you say that a soldier is doing what is ethically right, when he rapes a woman he’s supposed to defend?”
“I do not. I never have,” Marcus Aurelius replied. “I do, however, dispute your claim of agency applying to my government.”
“I suppose that may be true,” she said, “but it hasn’t got anything to do with what we’re talking about here.”
“I should be hard pressed to disagree with you. “ The Emperor inclined his head with studied courtesy. “By all means continue your argument; perhaps you may persuade me.”
He meant it. Nicole had long experience in the ways of judges and juries, and he was telling the truth. If she could persuade him, he’d give her what she wanted.
This was an honestly, incontestably good man. He wasn’t pretending. He wasn’t playing a part. He was a little on the imperial side for her democratic tastes, but of his goodness she had no doubts whatever. Nor was he doing it to gain himself a jump in the polls. He did it because of what he was; because, for him, there was no rational alternative.
Nicole had to stop to get her wits together. Genuine goodness in a politician was profoundly disconcerting.
She took refuge in the security of legal reasoning. “Your soldier was under orders to recapture Carnuntum from the Marcomanni and the Quadi, was he not? He was your agent – one of your agents – in that, am I correct?”
He nodded and smiled, as pleased as if she’d been his own protegee. “I believe I see the argument you’re framing,” he said. “Go on.”
“If that soldier was your agent when he was doing the things he was supposed to do, how can he stop being your agent when he commits a crime against me?” Nicole demanded. “He wouldn’t have been in Carnuntum in the first place if he hadn’t been acting on your behalf.”
“Yes, I thought this was the port toward which you would be sailing,” Marcus Aurelius replied happily. “But let me ask a question in return. If I send a man from Rome to Carthage to buy grain, I am liable if he should cheat on the transaction, not so?”
“Of course you are,” Nicole said.
“You take a broader view of the concept of agency than the jurisconsults are in the habit of doing, but never mind that,” Marcus Aurelius said. “Let me ask you another – you do understand the concept of what is termed a hypothetical question?”
“Yes,” Nicole said. Part of her, the quick, unthinking part, was irked that he needed to ask. But Umma the tavernkeeper by the banks of the Danube – would she have understood the concept?
Marcus Aurelius, in his turn, seemed surprised Nicole did understand. His eyebrows rose. He paused as if to marshal his thoughts – as if he needed to delete a whole section of argumentation she’d just rendered unnecessary. “Very well,” he said at last. “Suppose, then, that my agent, while in Carthage to buy grain, violated a woman. Would I be liable then!;
”