Kirk G. S., Raven J. E., Schofield M.
The Presocratic Philosophers: A Critical History with a Selection of Texts. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1983.Klein J. L.
Statistical Visions in Time: A History of Time Series Analysis, 1662–1938. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1997.Klein U.
Origin of the Concept of Chemical Compound // Science in Context 7 (1994). 163–204.Koyré A.
The Astronomical Revolution: Copernicus, Kepler, Borelli. P.: Hermann, 1973.Idem.
Concept and Experience in Newton’s Scientific Thought [1956] // Newtonian Studies. L.: Chapman & Hall, 1965. 25–52.Idem.
Du monde de «l’à-peu-près» à l’univers de la précision // Études d’histoire de la pensée philosophique. P.: Colin, 1971. 311–329.Idem.
Études d’histoire de la pensée scientifique. P.: Gallimard, 1973.Idem.
Études Galiléennes. P.: Hermann, 1966.Idem.
From the Closed World to the Infinite Universe. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1957.Idem.
Galilée et l’expérience de Pise: À propos d’une légende // Études d’histoire de la pensée scientifique. P.: Gallimard, 1973. 213–223.Idem.
Galileo and the Scientific Revolution of the Seventeenth Century // The Philosophical Review 52 (1943). 333–348.Idem.
Newtonian Studies. L.: Chapman & Hall, 1965.Kren C.
The Rolling Device of Nasir al-Dīn al-Tūsī in the De Spera of Nicole Oresme? // Isis 62 (1971). 490–498.Kristensen L. K., Møller Pedersen K.
Roemer, Jupiter’s Satellites and the Velocity of Light // Centaurus 54 (2012). 4–38.Kubovy M.
The Psychology of Perspective and Renaissance Art. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1986.Kuhn T. S.
The Copernican Revolution: Planetary Astronomy in the Development of Western Thought. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1957.Idem.
Dubbing and Redubbing: The Vulnerability of Rigid Designation // Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science 14 (1990). 298–318.Idem.
The Essential Tension: Selected Studies in Scientific Tradition and Change. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1977.Idem.
Historical Structure of Scientific Discovery // Science 136 (1962). 760–764.Idem.
Mathematical versus Experimental Traditions in the Development of Physical Science // The Journal of Interdisciplinary History 7 (1976). 1–31.Idem.
The Principle of Acceleration: A Non-dialectical Theory of Progress: Comment // Comparative Studies in Society and History 11 (1969). 426–430.Idem.
The Road since Structure: Philosophical Essays, 1970–1993, with An Autobiographical Interview. Ed. J. Conant, J. Haugeland. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2000.Idem.
The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1962.Idem.
The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1970.Idem.
The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1996.Idem.
The Trouble with the Historical Philosophy of Science: Robert and Maurine Rothschild Distinguished Lecture, 19 November 1991. Cambridge, Mass.: Department of the History of Science, Harvard University, 1992.Idem.
What are Scientific Revolutions? [1987] // The Road since Structure: Philosophical Essays, 1970–1993, with An Autobiographical Interview. Ed. J. Conant, J. Haugeland. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2000. 13–32.Kusch M.
Annalisa Coliva on Wittgenstein and Epistemic Relativism // Philosophia 41 (2013). 37–49.Idem.
Hacking’s Historical Epistemology: A Critique of Styles of Reasoning // Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 41 (2010). 158–173.Kusukawa S.
Picturing the Book of Nature: Image, Text and Argument in Sixteenth-century Human Anatomy and Medical Botany. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2011.Idem.
The Sources of Gessner’s Pictures for the Historia animalium // Annals of Science 67 (2010). 303–328.Kwa C
. Styles of Knowing. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press, 2011.Labinger J. A., Collins H. (eds.).
The One Culture? A Conversation about Science. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2001.La Boëtie É. de.
De la servitude volontaire, ou Contr’un. Ed. M. C. Smith. Geneva: Droz, 1987.Laird W. R.
Archimedes among the Humanists // Isis 82 (1991). 629–638.Lakatos I.
The Methodology of Scientific Research Programmes. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1978.Lamb D., Easton S. M
. Multiple Discovery. Amersham: Avebury, 1984.La Mettrie J. O. de.
La Mettrie’s ‘L’Homme machine’: A Study in the Origins of an Idea. Ed. A. Vartanian. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1960.Landes D. S.
Why Europe and the West? Why Not China? // Journal of Economic Perspectives 20 (2006). 3–22.