Изобретение науки. Новая история научной революции

Idem. Objective Knowledge: An Evolutionary Approach. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1972.

Idem. The Open Society and Its Enemies. L.: Routledge, 1945.

Popplow M. Setting the World Machine in Motion: The Meaning of Machina mundi in the Middle Ages and the Early Modern Period // Mechanics and Cosmology in the Medieval and Early Modern Period. Ed. M. Bucciantini, M. Camerota, S. Roux. Florence: L. S. Olschki, 2007. 45–70.

Porter R. The Scientific Revolution: A Spoke in the Wheel? // Revolution in History. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1986. 290–316.

Idem. The Scientific Revolution and Universities // A History of the University in Europe. 4 vols. Vol. 2. Ed. W. Rüegg. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996. 531–562.

Post H. R. Correspondence, Invariance and Heuristics: In Praise of Conservative Induction // Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 2 (1971). 213–255.

Powell T. The Passionate Poet. With a Description of the Thracian Ismarus. By T. P. L.: Valentine Simmes, 1601.

Power H. Experimental Philosophy, in Three Books Containing New Experiments Microscopical, Mercurial, Magnetical. L.: J. Martin, 1664.

Powers J. C. Ars sine arte: Nicholas Lemery and the End of Alchemy in Eighteenth-century France // Ambix 45 (1998). 163–189.

Principe L. M. Alchemy Restored // Isis 102 (2011). 305–312.

Idem. The Aspiring Adept: Robert Boyle and His Alchemical Quest. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1998.

Idem. Georges Pierre des Clozets, Robert Boyle, the Alchemical Patriarch of Antioch, and the Reunion of Christendom: Further New Sources // Early Science and Medicine 9 (2004). 307–320.

Idem. The Scientific Revolution: A Very Short Introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011.

Principe L. M., DeWitt L. Transmutations: Alchemy in Art. Philadelphia: Chemical Heritage Foundation, 2002.

Pritchard D. Epistemic Relativism, Epistemic Incommensurability and Wittgensteinian Epistemology // Blackwell Companion to Relativism. Ed. S. Hales. Oxford: Blackwell, 2010: 266–285.

Proclus and Euclid. In primum Euclidis elementorum librum commentariorum. Ed. F. Barozzi. Padua: G. Perchacinus, 1560.

Psillos S. Scientific Realism: How Science Tracks Truth. L.: Rout-ledge, 1999.

Pugliese P. J. The Scientific Achievement of Robert Hooke: Method and Mechanics. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1982.

Pumfrey S. Harriot’s Maps of the Moon: New Interpretations // Notes and Records of the Royal Society 63 (2009). 163–168.

Idem. Latitude: The Magnetic Earth. Cambridge: Icon, 2001.

Idem. ‘O tempora, O magnes!’ A Sociological Analysis of the Discovery of Secular Magnetic Variation in 1634 // British Journal for the History of Science 22 (1989). 181–214.

Idem. The Selenographia of William Gilbert: His Pre-telescopic Map of the Moon and His Discovery of Lunar Libration // Journal for the History of Astronomy 42 (2011). 193–203.

Idem. ‘Your Astronomers and Ours Differ Exceedingly’: The Controversy over the ‘New Star’ of 1572 in the Light of a Newly Discovered Text by Thomas Digges // British Journal for the History of Science 44 (2011). 29–60.

Pumfrey S., Rayson P., Mariani J. Experiments in 17thcentury English: Manual versus Automatic Conceptual History // Literary and Linguistic Computing 27 (2012). 395–408.

Purs I. Anselmus Boëtius de Boodt, Pansophie und Alchemie // Acta Comeniana 18 (2004). 43–90.

Putnam H. Meaning and the Moral Sciences. L.: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1978.

Idem. Mind, Language and Reality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1975.

Quine W. V. O. A Comment on Grünbaum’s Claim // Can Theories be Refuted? Ed. S. G. Harding. Dordrecht: D. Reidel, 1976. 132.

Idem. Main Trends in Recent Philosophy: Two Dogmas of Empiricism // Philosophical Review 60 (1951). 20–43.

Quintilian M. F. The Orator’s Education. Ed. D. A. Russell. 5 vols. Vol. 2. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 2001.

Rabb T. K. Religion and the Rise of Modern Science // Past & Present 31 (1965). 111–126.

Radelet de Grave P., Speiser D. Le «De magnete» de Pierre de Maricourt. Traduction et commentaire // Revue d’histoire des sciences 28 (1975). 193–234.

Ragep F. J. Copernicus and His Islamic Predecessors: Some Historical Remarks // History of Science 45 (2007). 65–81.

Ramazzini B., St Clair R. The Abyssinian Philosophy Confuted, or Telluris theoria Neither Sacred, nor Agreeable to Reason. L.: W. Newton, 1697.

Randall J. H. The School of Padua and the Emergence of Modern Science // Journal of the History of Ideas 1 (1940). 177–206.