Климатическая психология. Как добиться устойчивого развития

Carfora, V. D. m.fl. (2017). Moderating effects of pro-environmental self-identity on pro-environmental intentions and behaviour: A multi-behaviour study. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 53, 92–99.

De Dominicis, S. m.fl. (2017). Protecting the environment for self-interested reasons: Altruism is not the only pathway to sustainability. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 1065.

Hall, M. P., Lewis jr., N. A. & Ellsworth, P. C. (2018). Believing in climate change, but not behaving sustainably: evidence from a one-year longitudinal study. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 56, 55–62.

Lalot, F. m.fl. (2019). When does self-identity predict intention to act green? A self-completion account relying on past behaviour and majority-minority support for pro-environmental values. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 61, 79–92.

Mayer, F. S. (2018). Transforming psychological worldviews to confront climate change. A clearer vision, a different path. U.o.: University of California Press.

Raworth, K. (2017). Doughnut economics: Seven ways to think like a 21st century economist. London: Random House Business Books.

Schwartz, S. H. (1992). Universals in the content and structures of values: theoretical advances and empirical tests in 20 countries. I: M. Zanna (red.), Advances in Experimental Psychology, Vol. 25. Orlando: Academic Press, 1–65.

Schwartz, S. H. (1997). Values and culture. I: D. Munro, J. F. Schumaker & S. C. Carr (red.), Motivation and culture. New York: Routledge, 69–84.

Schwartz, S. H. (2006). A theory of cultural value orientations: Explication and applications. Comparative Sociology, 5, 2–3.

Steg, L. (2016). Values, norms, and intrinsic motivation to act proenvironmentally. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 41, 277–292. https://doi.org/(…)nviron-110615-085947

Unsworth, K. & McNeill, I. M. (2017). Increasing pro-environmental behaviors by increasing self-concordance: Testing an intervention. Journal of Applied Psychology. 102, 1, 88–103.

Van der Werff, E. & Steg, L. (2018). Spillover benefits: Emphasizing different benefits of environmental behavior and its effects on spillover. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, 23–47. https://doi. org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02347

Учитывать исполнителя и целевую группу

Aarons, G. A., Sommerfeld, D. H. & Walrath-Greene, C. M. (2009). Evidence-based practice implementation: The impact of public versus private sector organization type on organizational support, provider attitudes, and adoption of evidence-based practice. Implementation Science, 4, 83. doi:10.1186/1748-5908- 4-83

Aarons, G. A. m.fl. (2017). ”Scaling-out” evidence-based interventions to new populations or new health care delivery systems. Implementation Science, 12 (1), 1–13. doi:10.1186/s13012-0170640-6

Andersson, L. & Klintrot, M. (2013). Ledarskapets psykologi. 2 utg. Stockholm: Sanoma Utbildning.

Ashforth, B. E., Harrison, S. H. & Corley, K. G. (2008). Identification in organizations: An examination of four fundamental questions. Journal of Management, 34 (3), 325–374. doi:10.1177/0149206308316059

Boyd, A. (red.) (2012). Beautiful trouble. New York: OR Books.

Fixsen, D. L. m.fl. (2005). Implementation research: a synthesis of the literature. Tampa: University of South Florida (Louis de la Parte Florida Mental Health Institute, 231.)

Gearing, R. E. m.fl. (2011). Major ingredients of fidelity: A review and scientific guide to improving quality of intervention research implementation. Clinical Psychology Review, 31 (1), 79–88.

Hine, D. W. m.fl. (2014). Audience segmentation and climate change communication: Conceptual and methodological considerations. Climate Change, 5 (4), 441–459. doi:10.1002/wcc.279

Kemp, L. (2016). Adaptation and fidelity: A recipe analogy for achieving both in population scale implementation. Prevention Science, 17 (4), 429–438. doi:10.1007/s11121-016-0642-7

Michie, S., van Stralen, M. M. & West, R. (2011). The behaviour change wheel: A new method for characterising and designing behaviour change interventions. Implementation Science, 6, 42. doi:10.1186/1748-5908-6-42