Simon D.R.
The Sotheby's/Christies Antitrust Scandal and Proposed Changes to Illinois Art Auction Law // DePaul-LCA Journal of Art and Entertainment law. 2002. Vol. 12. P. 269.Sotheby's Conditions of Sale and Terms of Guarantee (2001) // Merryman J. H., Elsen A.E., Urice S.K. Law, Ethics and the Visual Art. 5th ed. Kluwer Lawl nternational, 2007. P. 1026.
Statutes of the Intergovernmental Committee for Promoting the Return of Cultural Property to Its Countries of Origin or Its Restitution in Case of Illicit Appropriation. Report of the Director General on a Strategy to Facilitate the Restitution of Stolen or Illicitly Exported Cultural Property. UNESCO. 171st sess. Doc. No. 171 EX/14, Add., Annex II (2005).
Stuart W.W.
Authenticity of Authorship and the Auction Market // Maine Law Review. 2002. Vol. 54. P. 71.Sunstein
C. Rights and Their Critics // Notre Dame Law Review. 1995. Vol. 70. P. 730.Svob-Dokic N., Obuljen N.
Comparative Cultural Policy Issues Related to Cultural Diversity in South East Europe. Mapping the Approaches and Practices. Policies for Culture – European Cultural Foundation, Amsterdam and ECUMEST Association. Bucharest, 2003. P. 1–6.Symeonides S.C.
A Choice-of-Law Rule for Conflicts Involving Stolen Cultural Property // Vanderbilt Journal of Transnational Law. 2005. Vol. 38. P. 1187.The Cleansing of David: the Debate Rages On // The Art Newspaper. 2003. Aug. 6.
The Last Supper Shown // BBC News. 1999. May 27.
Trappe J.
Conciliation in the Far East // Arbitration International. 1989. Vol. 5. P. 173.Weston A.
Between Means and Ends // The Monist. 1992. Vol. 75. P. 236, 242.Wichard J.Ch., Wendland W.B.
Mediations as an Option for Resolving Disputes between Indigenous / Traditional Communities and Industry Concerning Traditional Knowledge // Art and Cultural Heritage: Law, Policy and practice / B.T. Hoffman (ed.). Cambridge University Press, 2006. P. 477.Wilf S.
What Is Property's Fourth Estate? Cultural Property and the Fiduciary Ideal // Connecticut Journal of International Law. 2001. Vol. 16. P. 177.Судебная практика
Agudas Chasidei Chabad v. Russian Federation.
466 F. Supp. 2d 6 (D.D.C. 2006).Allgemeine Versicherunggesellschaft v. E.K. Entscheidugen des BGHZ.
Bd. 59. S. 82.Altmann v. Republic of Austria.
317 F. 3d 954 (9th Cir. 2002).Argentina v. Weltover. Inc.
504 U.S. 607 (1992).Attorney – General of New Zealand v. Ortiz
& Others. 1982. // Art and Cultural Heritage. Law, Policy and Practice / B.T. Hoffman (ed.) Cambridge University Press, 2006. P. 146.Autocephalous Greek-Orthodox Church of Cyprus and the Republic of Cyprus v. Goldberg
& Feldman Fine Arts, Inc. 717 F Supp. 1374 (S.D. Ind. 1985), affd, 917 F2d 278 (7th Cir. 1990).Banco Nacional de Cuba v. Sabbatino.
376 U.S. 398, 421 (1964).Beyeler v. Italy.
A. No. 33202/96 (5 Jan. 2000) // Merry-man J.H., Elsen A.E., Urice S.K. Law, Ethics and the Visual Art. 5th ed. Kluwer Law International, 2007. P. 122–135.Blaizotv. University of Liège.
[1988] ECR379.Case Concerning Certain Property (Liechtenstein v. Germany)
(Judgment of 10 February 2005). URL: www.icj-cij.org/docket/index.php?pl=3&p2=3&k=d9&case=123&code=la&p3=4Cassirer v. Kingdom of Spain.
461 F Supp. 2d 1157 (CD. Cal. 2006).Commission v. Belgium.
293/85R [1985] ECR 3521.Cristallina S.A. v. Christie, Manson
& Woods Infi, Inc., 502 N.Y.S. 2d 165, 171 (N.Y. App. Div. 1986).Fluoroware, Inc. v. Dainichi Shoji K.K.,
999 E Supp. 1265, 1271–1273 (D.Minn. 1997).Jeanneret v. Vichey.
693 E 2d 259 (2d Cir. 1982).International Criminal Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia. Case No. IT-01-42, Indictment of Feb. 22, 2001; Amended Indictment of Mar. 31, 2003.
Indiana v. Carter.
658 N.E. 2d 618 (Ind. App. 1995).King of Italy v. Marquis Cosimo de Medici Tornaquinci.
34 T.I.R. 623 (CH. 1918).Lovelace v. Canada.
UN Doc. CCPR/C/13/D/24/1977 (1981).Malewicz v. City of Amsterdam.
362 F. Supp. 2d 298 (D.C. Cir. 2005).Matteucci v. Communauté française de Belgique,
[1988] ECR 5589.McDonald's Corp. v. Bukele.
960 F. Supp. 1311, 1319 (N.D. 111. 1997).