But also in the city, closely knit extended family groups were important and active. One of such groups inhabited houses 4—12, Paternoster row, in Ur. To it belonged the brothers (or cousins) AnaSinwussur, Abuni, Imlikum, Sagisabusu, Iliiddinam, Attaia
et al. (UET V, 76
et al.). They appear in sundry business documents sometimes alone and sometimes in groups of two or three but, apparently, always representing the same «family firm». Also other similar family groups can be attested.Inside an extended family group, not all were connected with business or official activities; some of them appear only in documents concerning the division of inheritance, marriage contracts etc. Many houses excavated in OB Ur, some of them very big and apparently rich, did not contain any documents, which probably means that the families in question, whether belonging to the priesthood or connected with agricultural or animal-breeding activities, were not involved in business money transactions which need ed to be fixed in writing.
Documents and terracottas from the block Paternoster row 4—12 show that certain girls belonging to the extended family served as
ukbabatum-priestesses (the title
ukbabtumin Ur being equivalent to
qadistumelsewhere). They were (at least originally) clearly distinguished from the prostitutes, the
harimtum. Although also the latter were under the protection of the goddess Istar, they were, in contradistinction to the
qadistumand the
ukbabtum, not priestesses. In the author's conjecture, the
ukbabtum/
qadistumwere destined to coition with a stranger representing a god (cf. Herodotus, I, 199), in what was an equivalent to the Sacred Marriage Rite in the great temples.If a princess royal could become an
entum(high priestess) and (in Ur) spouse of the Moon-god, girls belonging to the elite might be recruited as
lukur, or concubines of the same or other great gods, and probably substitutes of the
entumas she grew older; families of somewhat lower standing gave some of their daughters away as
ukbabtumor
qadistum; it was probably a matter of dowry which the family could spare for the girl's initiation. In the poorest families the girls that did not marry became
harimtum.Part of the contents of this chapter are published in the «Zeitschrift f"ur Assyriologie» NF 74—1 (1985) as
Extended Families in Old Babylonian Ur,and in the «Journal of Economic and Social History of the Orient», XIX (1985), as
Women in Old Babylonia not under Patriarchal Authority.Chapter VII.
Slaves and poor people, is based on documents discovered in the same block 4—12, Paternoster row, but deals with impecunious people only, either living in the same extended family complex, or being clients of the businessmen in that family: Abuni, Ilusunasir, Umussu, NidnatSin, LudlulSin, Dulatum, Naramtum, the pauper-prostitute Bawurisat,
et al.Chapter VIII.
Servitors of the Temple. Another Schoolis based on the archives of 5 and 7, Quiet street, connected with the family of the temple administrator UrNanna, and later with Kug-
dNingal, and their neighbours and associates. The text 7804 = UET V 666, belonging to this archive, erroneously listed by H. H. Figulla and D. Charpin as a «list of logs», is shown to be a cadastre of lands belonging to the Temple of Nanna; the lands are listed once according to their quality, and the second time according to their being apportioned to certain social groups under different conditions.The family in question was that of a
sandabakkuwhich seems thus to have been the economic administrator of the Nanna temple; hence, it is doubtful that the family inhabited only the modest house 7, Quiet street; more probably, it owned, like the Imlikum clan, the whole block of houses in Quiet street. UrNanna's descendant, Kug-
dNingal, was an
abrikku-ipriest of Eia.An interpretation different from that given by D. Charpin is suggested for the «school» in 5 Quiet street, and to the «Children's corner» containing dozens of burials of children (school-children?), apparently synchronous, and belonging to children of approximately the same age; victims of Samsuiluna's raid?