Читаем Medium Raw полностью

I do have a pretty good idea what I’d do, however, if I had the kind of big money Jamie’s got. And it would not be the same as what he’s doing with it.

Say what you will about how well, how attractively or advisably, but Jamie Oliver puts his money where his mouth is. The sincerity with which he’s focused on school lunches, educating kids on how to cook—and even how to eat—is largely, I gather, unwelcomed, and, relative to potentially more purely profit-oriented exercises, maybe not the best of options.

Jamie would clearly prefer to be an annoying nag, reminding us that we’re fat and unhealthy, than make more money. You have to admire that. Sure, he’s still bringing down plenty of dough—but you gotta respect a guy who manages to embarrass the whole British government with a show about what their schoolkids are actually eating. That kind of talk will eventually make you unpopular. It’s very rarely a good career move to have a conscience.

If experience teaches us anything, it’s that the very last thing a television audience wants to hear or be reminded of is how bad things are, how unhealthy or how doomed—that we’re heading off a cliff and dragging our kids after us. (Unless it’s accompanied by bombastic accusations of conspiracy—and a suitable candidate to blame for the problem.) It’s bad business to be saying all sorts of awful, alarmist shit like that—particularly when it’s true. It is much better business, always, to tell people, over and over again, in a reassuring voice (or, better yet, a loud, annoying one) that everything is just fine. It’ll all work out. The kids can keep jamming soda and chips into their neckless maws. They’ll be okay. No need to worry. You’re great! You’re awesome! And here’s a recipe for deep-fried potato pizza!

Jamie Oliver is a hero for doing the harder thing—when he surely doesn’t have to do anything at all. Most chefs I know, were they where Jamie is on the Success-O-Meter? They’d be holed up at a Four Seasons somewhere, shades drawn, watching four tranny hookers snort cocaine off each other.

Brooke Johnson, the head honcho at Food Network, is a villain. That’s an easy one.

But she’s a villain for being right—not for the cynical, fake-ass, soul-destroying, lowest-common-denominator shit-shows she’s nurtured and supported since taking the helm. She’s a villain for being, clearly and demonstrably, right about everything.

On her watch, the network’s audience share has exploded. The number of male viewers most treasured by advertisers expands exponentially every year, demographics of viewers watching Food Network tilting to the good in ways that are the envy of every other network—that prime-quality cut of big-spending, ever-younger male viewers getting larger and larger with each financial quarter. Every clunky, bogus, critically vilified clusterfuck that drops from FN’s hindquarters, still steaming and seemingly dead on arrival, turns out to be an unprecedented ratings success.

Even the FN-branded magazines are doing monster business: nearly alone in an otherwise bleak field littered with the dead, they have thrived, becoming plump and then plumper with ad pages.

There is an unimpeachable logic to your argument when no matter what one may say about what you do—or even how true their observations might be—you can respond with two words: “It works.”

Whatever Brooke Johnson has done, it is working. That success ensures that whoever complains about “quality” sounds quaint—even deranged—like some sad Old Hollywood shrunken head, talking about Ford and Lubitsch, Selznick and Thalberg—to an interviewer who has no idea who or what they’re talking about.

And for that, and the fact that she couldn’t and probably shouldn’t give a shit whether she’s a villain or not—she’s a villain.

Wylie Dufresne is a hero.

Because he’s made a life’s work of doing exactly the opposite of what Brooke Johnson does. At his restaurant, WD-50, where you’re likely to actually find him most nights, he doesn’t care if you don’t understand the food. He will not be moved from his plan if people hate an occasional dish. It doesn’t matter to Wylie if, on balance, most of you would rather have a steak—that he would surely struggle less, and make a lot more money, please more of the dining public, if he only made some compromises. He knows that even if you love everything on his menu, his is not the kind of meal that people come back for every week.

Перейти на страницу:

Похожие книги

Курская битва. Наступление. Операция «Кутузов». Операция «Полководец Румянцев». Июль-август 1943
Курская битва. Наступление. Операция «Кутузов». Операция «Полководец Румянцев». Июль-август 1943

Военно-аналитическое исследование посвящено наступательной фазе Курской битвы – операциям Красной армии на Орловском и Белгородско-Харьковском направлениях, получившим наименования «Кутузов» и «Полководец Румянцев». Именно их ход и результаты позволяют оценить истинную значимость Курской битвы в истории Великой Отечественной и Второй мировой войн. Автором предпринята попытка по возможности более детально показать и проанализировать формирование планов наступления на обоих указанных направлениях и их особенности, а также ход операций, оперативно-тактические способы и методы ведения боевых действий противников, достигнутые сторонами оперативные и стратегические результаты. Выводы и заключения базируются на многофакторном сравнительном анализе научно-исследовательской и архивной исторической информации, включающей оценку потерь с обеих сторон. Отдельное внимание уделено личностям участников событий. Работа предназначена для широкого круга читателей, интересующихся военной историей.

Петр Евгеньевич Букейханов

Военное дело / Документальная литература