Mens Rea в уголовном праве Соединенных Штатов Америки

226. Singh R. U. History of the Defence of Drunkenness in English Criminal Law // The Law Quarterly Review. L., 1933. Vol. 49, № 196. P. 528–546.

227. Smith A.T.H. Judicial Law Making in the Criminal Law // The Law Quarterly Review. L., 1984. Vol. 100, № 1. P. 46–76.

228. Smith J.C. The Guilty Mind in the Criminal Law // The Law Quarterly Review. L., 1960. Vol. 76, № 301. P. 78–99.

229. Smith J.C. Two Problems in Criminal Attempts // Harvard Law Review. Cambridge (Mass.), 1957. Vol. 70, № 3. P. 422–448.

230. Stallybrass W.T.S. The Eclipse of Mens Rea II The Law Quarterly Review. L, 1936. Vol. 52, № 205. P. 60–67.

231. Stephen H. Homicide by Necessity // The Law Quarterly Review. L, 1885. Vol. 1, № 1. P. 51–61.

232. Stephen J.F. A Digest of the Criminal Law (Indictable Offences). 9^th ed., by Lewis F. Sturge. L.: Sweet & Maxwell, Ltd., 1950. xlviii p., 580p.

233. Stephen J.F. A History of the Criminal Law of England. In Three Volumes. Vol. I. L.: MacMillan and Co., 1883. xv [iii] p., 576 p.

234. Stiles G.T. Comment, North Carolina’s Unconstitutional Expansion of an Ancient Maxim: Using DWI Fatalities to Satisfy First Degree Felony-Murder // Campbell Law Review. Buies Creek (N.C.), 1999. Vol. 22, № 1. P. 169–209.

235. Story J. Commentaries on the Constitution of the United States; With a Preliminary Review of the Constitutional History of the Colonies and States, Before the Adoption of the Constitution: In Three Volumes. Volume I. Boston: Hilliard, Gray and Company; Cambridge (Mass.): Brown, Shattuck, And Co., 1833. xxxiv p., 494 p.

236. Stuart D. Supporting General Principles for Criminal Responsibility in the Model Penal Code with Suggestions for Reconsideration: A Canadian Perspective // Buffalo Criminal Law Review. Buffalo (N.Y.), 2000. Vol. 4, № 1. P. 13–51.

237. Stubbs W. Select Charters and Other Illustrations of English Constitutional History from the Earliest Times to the Reign of Edward the First. 5^th ed. Oxford: At the Clarendon Press, 1884. xii p., 552 + 36 p.

238. Sudduth T. Comment, The Dillon Dilemma: Finding Proportionate Felony-Murder Punishments // California Law Review. Berkeley (Cal.), 1984. Vol. 72, № 6. P. 1299–1327.

239. Sullivan G.R. Intent, Subjective Recklessness and Culpability // Oxford Journal of Legal Studies. Oxford, 1992. Vol. 12, № 3. P. 380391.

240. Swanson K.A. Case Notes, Criminal Law: Mens Rea and Well: Limiting Public Welfare Offenses – ln Re C.R.M. 11 William Mitchell Law Review. St. Paul (Minn.), 2002. Vol. 28, № 3. P. 1265–1282.

241. The Laws of the Earliest English Kings / Edited and Translated by F.L. Attenborough. N.Y.: Russell & Russell Inc., 1963. xii p., 256 p.

242. The Laws of the Kings of England from Edmund to Henry I / Edited and Translated by A.J. Robertson. Cambridge: At the University Press, 1925. xiii [i] p., 426 p.

243. The Supreme Court, 1986 Term // Harvard Law Review. Cambridge (Mass.), 1987. Vol. 101, № 1. P. 7–370.

244. Thomas, III, G.C. Realism About Rape Law: A Comment on «Redefining Rape» // Buffalo Criminal Law Review. Buffalo (N.Y.), 2000. Vol. 3, № 2. P. 527–555.

245. Thorne S.E. Fitzherbert’s Abridgement I I Law Library Journal. Chicago, 1936. Vol. 29, № 3. P. 59–63.

246. Tomkovicz J.J. The Endurance of the Felony-Murder Rule: A Study of the Forces that Shape Our Criminal Law // Washington and Lee Law Review. Lexington (Va.), 1994. Vol. 51, № 4. P. 1429–1480.

247. Travers M.L. Mistake of Law in Mala Prohibita Crimes // The University of Chicago Law Review. Chicago, 1995. Vol. 62, № 3. P. 1301–1331.