Economic Journal,
366–374. Reprinted in Caldwell, 1983, 225–233.1982. Beyond Positivism: Economic Methodology in the Twentieth Century.
London:Allen and Unwin.
1983. The neoclassical maximization hypothesis: comment. American Economic
Review,
73. Reprinted in Caldwell, 1984, 252–255.1984. Appraisal and Criticism in Economics. A Book of Readings.
Boston: Allen andUnwin.
1991. Clarifying Popper. Journal of Economic Literature,
29 (1), 1—33.1992. Hayek the Falsificationist? A Refutation. In Research in the History of Economic
Thought and Methodology,
10, W. J. Samuels (ed.). Greenwich, CN: JAl Press.Caldwell B. J. and Coats A. W., 1984. The rhetoric of economics: a comment on
McCloskey. Journal of Economic Literature,
22 (2), 575—578. Canterberry E. R. and Burkhardt R. J., 1983. What do we mean by asking whethereconomics is a science? In Eichner, 1983, 15—40. Caplan A. L., 1985. The nature of Darwinian explanation: is Darwinian evolutionary theory
scientific? In What Darwin Began,
L. K. Godfrey. Boston: Allyn and Bacon, 24—39. Caves R. E., 1960. Trade and Economic Structures. Models and Methods. Cambridge:Harvard University Press. Caves R. E. and Johnson H. G., 1968. Readings in International Economics.
London:Allen & Unwin. Chalmers A. F., 1976. What Is This Thing Called Science?
Milton Keynes: The OpenUniversity Press.
Chick V., 1973. The Theory of Monetary Policy.
Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 2nd ed. Churchman С W., 1968. A Challenge to Reason. New York: McGraw–Hill. Clarkson G. P. E., 1963. The Theory of Consumer Demand: A Critical Appraisal.Englewood Cliffs: Prentice–Hall.
Coase R. H., 1975. Marshall on method. Journal of Law and Economics,
18, April, 25—31. Coats A. W., 1954. The historist reaction in English political economy, 1870—1890.Economica,
21, 143—153.1976. Economics and psychology: the death and resurrection of a research
programme. In Latsis, 1976, 43—64.
1977. The current «crisis» in economics in historical perspective. Nebraska Journal
of Economics and Business,
16 (3), 3—16.1983. Half a century of methodological controversy in economics: as reflected in
the writings of T. W. Hutchison. In Methodological Controversy in Economics: Historical
Essays in Honor of T. W. Hutchison.
A. W. Coats (ed.). Greenwich, CN: JAI Press.CoddingtonA., 1972. Positive economics. Canadian Journal of Economics,
5. Reprinted in Marr and Raj, 1983, 69–88.1975. The rationale of general equilibrium theory. Economic Inquiry,
13, 539—558.1976a. The Adequacy and Applicability of Economic Theories: A Perspective on the
Methodological Views of Rabbins and Friedman.
London: Queen Mary College,University of London Occasional Papers, No 26.
1983. Keynesian Economics: The Search for First Principles.
London: Allen and Unwin.Cohen 1. В., 1980. The Newtonian Revolution.
Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.— 1985. Revolution in Science.
Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Cohen M. R., 1931. Reason and Nature: An Essay on the Meaning of Scientific Method.
New York: Harcourt, Brace. Cohen M. R. and Nagel E., 1934. An Introduction to Logic and Scientific Method.
New York: Harcourt, Brace. Cohn E. and Geske T. G., 1990. The Economics of Education.
Oxford: PergamonPress, 3d ed. Colander D. and Klamer A., 1987. The making of an economist. Journal of Economic
Perspectives,
1 (2), 95—111. Collins H. M., 1985. Changing Order. Replication and Induction in Scientific Practice.London: Sage Publications. CordenW. M., 1965. Recent Developments in the Theory of International Trade.
Princeton:Princeton University, International Finance Section. Cross R., 1982. The Duhem—Quine thesis, Lakatos and the appraisal of theories in
macroeconomics. Economic Journal,
92. Reprinted in Caldwell, 1984, 285—304.