Luborsky L., Singer B., Luborsky L.
Comparative studies of psychotherapy // Archives of General Psychiatry. 1975. V. 32. P. 995–1008.Luborsky L., Crits-Christoph P., Mintz J., Auerbach A.
Who Will Benefit From Psychotherapy. NY: Basic Books, 1988.Morris R. J., Suckerman K. R.
Morris and Suckerman reply // J. of Consulting and Clin. Psychology. 1975. V. 43. P. 585–586.Morris R. J., Suckerman K. R.
The importance of therapeutic relationships in systematic desensitization // J. of Consulting and Clin. Psychology. 1974. V. 42. P. 148–156.Morris R. J., Suckerman K. R.
Therapist warmth as a factor in automated systematic desensitization // J. of Consulting and Clin. Psychology. 1974. V. 42. P. 244–250.Nicholson R. A., Berman J. S.
Is follow-up necessary in evaluating psychotherapy? // Psychological Bulletin. 1983. V. 93. P. 261–278.Rachman S., Wilson G. T.
The effect of psychological therapy: Second enlarged edition. NY: Pergamon, 1980.Rogers C. R.
The necessary and sufficient conditions of therapeutic personality change // J. of Consulting Psychology. 1957. V. 21. P. 95–103.Russell R.
Language in psychotherapy: Strategies of discovery. NY: Plenum, 1987.Shapiro D., Firth J.
Prescriptive versus exploratory psychotherapy. Outcomes of the Sheffield Psychotherapy Project // British J. of Psychiatry. 1987. V. 151. P. 790–799.Shapiro D. A., Shapiro D.
Meta-analysis of comparative theory outcome studies: A replication and refinement // Psychological Bulletin. 1982.V. 92. P. 581–604.Spence D.
Traditional case studies and prescriptions for improving them // Psychodynamic treatment research. A handbook for clinical practice / N. Miller et al. (eds). NY: Wiley, 1993.Stiles W. B., Shapiro D. A., Elliott R.
Are all psychotherapies equivalent? // Amer. Psychologist. 1986. V. 41. P. 165–180.Strupp H.H.
Success and failure in time-limited psychotherapy: A systematic comparison of two cases-comparison 1 // Archives of General Psychiatry. 1980. V. 37. P. 595–603a.Strupp H.H.
Success and failure in time-limited psychotherapy: A systematic comparison of two cases-comparison 2 // Archives of General Psychiatry. 1980. V. 37. P. 708–716b.Strupp H.H.
Success and failure in time-limited psychotherapy: A systematic comparison of two cases-comparison 4 // Archives of General Psychiatry. 1980. V. 37. P. 974–945c.Strupp H. H.
Success and failure in time-limited psychotherapy: With special reference to the performance of a lay counselor // Archives of General Psychiatry. 1980. V. 37. P. 831–841d.Strupp H., Schacht T., Henry W.
Problem-Treatment-Outcome congruence: A principle whose time has come // Psychoanalytic process research strategies / H. Dahl, H. Kaechele, H. Thomae (eds). NY, 1988. P. 1–14.Sullivan H. S.
The interpersonal theory of psychiatry. NY: Norton, 1953. The psychotherapeutic process: A research handbook / L. Greenberg, W. Pinsof (eds). NY: Guilford, 1986.Wallerstein R. S.
Forty-two lives in treatment: A study of psychoanalysis and psychotherapy. NY: Guilford, 1986.Wallerstein R. S., Robbins L., Sargent H., Luborsky L.
The psychotherapy Research Project of the Menninger Foundation: Rationale, Method and Sample Use. First Report // Bull. of Menninger Clin. 1956. V. 20. P. 221–278.Weiss J. B., Sampson H.
The psychoanalytic process: theory clinical observation and empirical research. NY: Guilford, 1986.Нарратив в психотерапии: рассказы пациентов о личной истории
Предпринятое исследование – наш первый шаг в изучении функции нарративов в психотерапевтическом процессе посредством анализа их содержательных и формальных характеристик. В ходе предварительных исследований проанализированы многочисленные труды, посвященные проблеме рассказывания историй в процессе психотерапии, конструирования и реконструирования личной истории пациентов, а также проведен анализ многих психотерапевтических сеансов: под разным углом зрения, с использованием различных методик[2]
. Оба эти направления позволили сформулировать собственный подход и понимание нарратива как специфической формы психотерапевтического дискурса.