3. Bouchard, J. T. et al. (1990). Sources of human psychological differences: the Minnesota study of twins reared apart.
4. Van Dongen, J. et al. (2012). The continuing value of twin studies in the omics era.
5. Tenesa, A. & Haley, C. S. (2013). The heritability of human disease: estimation, uses and abuses.
6. Derks, E. M. et al. (2006). A test of the equal environment assumption in multivariate twin studies.
7. Gabbett, M. T. et al. (2019). Molecular support for heterogonesis resulting in sesquizygotic twinning.
8. Polderman, T. J. C. et al. (2015). Meta-analysis of the heritability of human traits based on fifty years of twin studies.
9. Sanders, A. R. et al. (2017). Genome-wide association study of male sexual orientation.
10. Hatemi, P. K. et al. (2014). Genetic influences on political ideologies: twin analyses of 19 measures of political ideologies from five democracies and genome-wide findings from three populations.
11. Young, A. I. (2019). Solving the missing heritability problem.
12. Purves, D. et al. (2012).
13. Negi, S. K. & Guda, C. (2017). Global gene expression profiling of healthy human brain and its application in studying neurological disorders.
14. Wen, L. et al. (2016). Contribution of Variants in
15
16. Plomin, R. et al. (2016). Top 10 replicated findings from behavioral genetics. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 11 (1), 3–23.
17. Casonato, M. & Habersaat, S. (2015). Parenting without being genetically connected.
18. Kirkman-Brown, J. C. & Martins, M. V. (2020). ‘Genes versus children’: if the goal is parenthood, are we using the optimal approach?
19. Gezinski, L. B. et al. (2016). Exploring motivations, awareness of side effects, and attitudes among potential egg donors.
20. Golombok, S. (2021). Love and truth: what really matters for children born through third-party assisted reproduction.
21. Malm, K. & Welti, K. (2010). Exploring Motivations to Adopt.
22. Ijzendoorn, M. H. & Juffer, F. (2005). Adoption is a successful natural intervention enhancing adopted children’s IQ and school performance.
23. Cheesman, R. et al. (2020). Comparison of adopted and nonadopted individuals reveals gene-environment interplay for education in the UK Biobank.
24. Kendler, K. S. et al. (2016). The rearing environment and risk for drug abuse: a Swedish national high-risk adopted and not adopted co-sibling control study.
25. Kendler, K. S. et al. (2016). Criminal offending and the family environment: Swedish national high-risk home-reared and adopted-away co-sibling control study.
26. Kendler, K. S. et al. (2015). Triparental families: a new genetic-epidemiological design applied to drug abuse, alcohol use disorders, and criminal behavior in a Swedish national sample.
27. Julian, M. M. (2013). Age at adoption from institutional care as a window into the lasting effects of early experiences.
28. Decker, S. & Omori, M. (2009). Age of adoption: long-term measures of success in adulthood.