Пособие по общественным связям в науке и технологиях

• Каким образом использование медиа учеными и научными организациями вносит вклад в «кризис посредников»?

• Какие специфические подходы к исследованию могут применяться при анализе культуры науки в обществе и более глубокого понимания места науки в культуре?

Литература

Allum, N., P. Sturgis, D. Tabourazi and I. Brunton-Smith (2008) ‘Science, knowledge and attitudes across cultures: a meta-analysis’, Public Understanding of Science, 17, 1: 35–54.

Bauer, M. and P. Jensen (2011) ‘The mobilisation of scientists for public engagement’, Public Understanding of Science, 20, 1: 3–11.

Bauer, M., R. Shukla and N. Allum (eds) (2012) The Culture of Science: How the Public Relates to Science across the World, London and New York: Routledge.

Ben-David, J. (1971) The Scientist’s Role in Society: A Comparative Study, Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall.

Bonney, R., C. B. Cooper, J. Dickinson, S. Kelling, T. Phillips, K. V. Rosenberg and J. Shirk (2009) ‘Citizen Science: A developing tool for expanding science knowledge and scientific literacy’, BioScience, 59, 11: 977–984.

Bucchi, M. (1998) Science and the Media: Alternative Routes in Scientific Communication, London and New York: Routledge.

Bucchi, M. (2008) ‘Of deficits, deviations and dialogues: theories of public communication of science’, in M. Bucchi and B. Trench (eds) Handbook of Public Communication of Science and Technology, London and New York: Routledge, 57–76.

Bucchi, M. (2009) Beyond Technocracy: Science, Politics and Citizens, New York: Springer.

Bucchi, M. (2010) Scientisti e antiscientisti. Perch'e scienza e societ`a non si capiscono, Bologna: il Mulino.

Bucchi, M. (2013) ‘Style in science communication’, Public Understanding of Science, 22, 8: 904–915.

Bucchi, M. (2014) ‘Norms, competition and visibility in contemporary science: the legacy of Robert K. Merton’, Journal of Classical Sociology.

Bucchi, M. and F. Neresini (2011) ‘Which indicators for the new public engagement activities? An exploratory study of European research institution’, Public Understanding of Science, 20, 1: 64–79.

Callon, M. (1999) ‘The role of lay people in the production and dissemination of scientific knowledge’, Science, Technology and Society, 4, 1: 81–94.

Callon, M., P. Lascoumes and Y. Barthe (2001) Agir Dans un Monde Incertain. Essai sur la D'emocratie Technique, Paris: Editions du Seuil.

Davies, S., E. McCallie, E. Simonsson, L. Lehr and S. Duensing (2008) ‘Discussing dialogue: perspectives on the value of science dialogue events that do not inform policy’, Public Understanding of Science, 18, 3: 338–353.

Delfanti, A. (2013) Biohackers – The Politics of Open Science, London: Pluto Books.

Dornan, C. (1990) ‘Some problems in conceptualising the issue of “science in the media”’, Critical Studies in Media Communication, 7, 1: 48–71.

Durant, J. (1993) ‘What is scientific literacy?’ in J. Durant and J. Gregory (eds) Science and Culture in Europe, London: Science Museum, 29–138.

Durodi'e, B. (2003) ‘Limitations of public dialogue in science and the rise of the new “experts”’, Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy, 6, 4: 82–92.

Einsiedel, E. (2000) ‘Understanding “publics” in public understanding of science’, in M. Dierckes and C. von Grote (eds) Between Understanding and Trust: The Public, Science and Technology, London and New York: Routledge, 205–215.

Epstein, S. (1995) ‘The construction of lay expertise: AIDS, activism and the forging of credibility in the reform of clinical trials’, Science, Technology and Human Values, 20, 4: 408–437.

Ezrahi, Y. (1990) The Descent of Icarus, Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

Gieryn, T. (1998) ‘Balancing acts: science, Enola Gay and history wars at the Smithsonian’, in S. Macdonald (ed.) The Politics of Display: Museums, Science, Culture, London: Routledge, 197–227.

Goffman, E. (1959) The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life, Garden City: Doubleday.