12 See e.g. the comments of Major-General Prince Vasili Viazemsky, who commanded a brigade in Tormasov’s army: Tartakovskii (ed.), Voennye dnevniki
, pp. 199–215.13 Langeron calls this army ‘one of the best in Europe’. As deputy commander of this force his view is biased but it was to be proved by the Army of the Danube’s performance. Mémoires de Langeron, Général d’Infanterie dans l’Armée Russe: Campagnes de
1812, 1813, 1814, Paris, 1902, p. 7.14 VPR
, 6, no. 164, Russo-Turkish peace treaty, pp. 406–17.15 The two key letters from Alexander to Chichagov were written on 6 and 22 July (OS): VIS
, 2/3, 1912, pp. 201–6.16 MVUA
1812, 16, Alexander to Barclay, 7 April 1812 (OS), pp. 181–2.17 The instructions are VPR
, 6, no. 145, 21 April 1812, pp. 363–5.18 VPR
, 6, no. 197, Rumiantsev to Alexander, 5/17 July 1812, pp. 486–90.19 MVUA
1812, 13, no. 321, Tuyll to Barclay, 26 June/8 July 1812, pp. 329–30. VIS, 2/3, 1912, Alexander to Chichagov, 13 June 1812 (OS), pp. 196–8. On Austrian promises, see in particular Francis II’s conversation with Stackelberg: VPR, 6, no. 158, Stackelberg to Rumiantsev, 29 April/11 May 1812, pp. 393–6.20 For march-routes and times, see MVUA
1812, vol. 17, pp. 197–8.21 V. von Löwenstern, Mémoires du Général-Major Russe Baron de Löwenstern
, 2 vols., Paris, 1903, vol. 1, p. 250. VS, 47/1, 1904, no. 19, Alexander to Barclay, 24 Nov. 1812 (OS), pp. 231–6.22 S. Panchulidzev, Istoriia kavalergardov
, SPB, 1903, vol. 3, p. 180.23 N. M. Konshin, ‘Zapiski o 1812 gode’, IV
, 8, 1884, pp. 263–86, at pp. 281–2. A.M. Valkovich and A. P. Kapitonov (eds.), Borodino: Dokumental’naia khronika, Moscow, 2004, no. 27, Kutuzov to Alexander, 19 Aug. 1812 (OS), pp. 24–5. Kutuzov, vol. 4i, Moscow, 1954, no. 125, Kutuzov to E. I. Kutuzova, 19 August 1812 (OS), p. 108.24 Langeron, Mémoires
, p. 28. Many wounded were actually abandoned at Mozhaisk but this was exceptional.25 Carl von Clausewitz, The Campaign of
1812 in Russia, London, 1992, pp. 175–6.26 Antoine de Jomini, The Art of War
, London, 1992, pp. 64–5, 230, 233–8.27 Eugen, Memoiren
, vol. 2, pp. 70–72.28 F. Glinka, Pis’ma russkogo ofitsera
, Moscow, 1987, p. 293.29 See the comments by Konovnitsyn and General Kreutz (who commanded some of the rearguard’s cavalry) in Kharkevich (ed.), 1812 god
, vol. 2, pp. 70–72, 124–5; also Mikhailovsky-Danilevsky’s reminiscences about Konovnitsyn in Tartakovskii (ed.), Voennye dnevniki, pp. 313–16. Bogdanovich, Istoriia…1812, vol. 2, pp. 129–36.30 Ivan Radozhitskii, Pokhodnyia zapiski artillerista s
1812 po 1816 god, 3 vols., Moscow, 1835, vol. 1, pp. 131–2.31 For the record of this committee, see Kutuzov
, vol. 4i, no. 82, pp. 71–3. For the issues behind the choice, see A. G. Tartakovskii, Nerazgadannyi Barklai, Moscow, 1996, pp. 130–37. A. A. Podmazo, ‘K voprosu o edinom glavnokomanduiushchem v 1812 godu’, in Otechestvennaia voina 1812 goda: Istochniki, pamiatniki, problemy. Materialy X vserossiiskoi nauchnoi konferentsii. Borodino, 3–5 sentiabria 2001 g., Moscow, 2002, pp. 140–46.32 Dnevnik Pavla Pushchina
, 19 Aug. 1812 (OS), p. 59. Correspondance de l’Empereur Alexandre, nos. 70 and 73, Alexander to Catherine, 8 Aug. and 18 Sept. (OS), pp. 81–2, 86–93.33 The literature on Kutuzov is immense. Probably the best summary is by N. A. Troitskii, Fel’dmarshal Kutuzov: Mify i fakty
, Moscow, 2002.34 On relations among the leading generals, see above all V. Bezotosnyi, ‘Bor’ba general’skikh gruppirovok’, in Epokha
1812 goda: issledovaniia, istochniki, istoriografiia, TGIM, Moscow, 2002, vol. 1, but also Lidiia Ivchenko, Borodino: Legenda i deistvitel’nost’, Moscow, 2002, pp. 6–18.35 In addition to the sources listed in the previous note, see Mémoires du Général Bennigsen
, 3 vols., Paris, n.d., vol. 3, pp. 77–84. On one dispute, concerning the design of the Raevsky Battery, see I. P. Liprandi, Materialy dlia otechestvennoi voiny 1812 goda: Sobranie statei, SPB, 1867, 176–8.36 Clausewitz, Campaign
, p. 148.