In the 16th century, Muscovy improvised an authority structure which would enable it to cope with the challenges it faced both from the steppe and from European great powers. The resulting Russian Empire was remarkably successful: it became the largest territorial state on earth and outlasted most of its rivals. It offered its population basic physical security, modest but assured access to resources, and membership of stable communities. It also proved successful on the whole at integrating non-Russian peoples. On the other hand, the state’s overweening exercise of authority, its dependence on wilful and often corrupt agents, and the general weakness of law and institutions impeded economic development, enfeebled the link between elites and masses, and generated bitter resentments which sporadically burst forth in rebellion. Discontent was intensified in the late 19th and early 20th centuries by the penetration of European ideas into ever broader strata of the population.
The First World War nearly destroyed Russia, but it revived for a time as the Soviet Union, and even after the latter’s collapse, it survives in reduced form. The authoritarian and personalized political structure which brought it success in the past is, however, ill-suited to the entirely different challenges Russia faces today, of adjusting to a global high-tech economy and an increasingly interdependent world in which nuclear weapons have made war between major powers virtually impossible.
Today, moreover, Russians are better educated than in the past, and they have incomparably more experience of life outside their own country, especially in Europe and North America. The age-old justification of authoritarianism – that the country faces powerful external threats – is no longer persuasive. The gap between rulers and ruled is widening once more. Russia is one of the world’s great survivors, and it will probably cope in its own way with these challenges. How it will do so is at the moment impossible to say.
Further reading
General
The themes of this book are treated at greater length in Geoffrey Hosking,
Philip Longworth,
On the difficulty of building a Russian nation within a Russian empire, see Vera Tolz,
Timothy Snyder,
Marshall Poe,
Chapter 1
Simon Franklin and Jonathan Shepard,
Janet Martin,
Serge A. Zenkovsky (ed.),
David Morgan,
Robert O. Crummey,
Chapter 2
Donald Ostrowski,
Nancy Shields Kollmann,
Isabel de Madariaga,
Robert Frost,
Brian L. Davies,
Philip Longworth,
Chapter 3
John LeDonne,
William Fuller,
Iver B. Neumann,