Читаем The Great Movies III полностью

The plots of his earlier movies are almost impossible to describe, although such later titles as Montenegro (1981) and The Coca-Cola Kid (1985) are more linear. Montenegro, a brilliant seriocomedy, is about a bored American wife in Stockholm (Susan Anspach) who escapes her marriage and spends two wild, liberating nights in a nightclub frequented by Serbo-Croatian immigrants. The Coca-Cola Kid stars Eric Roberts as a man from headquarters in Atlanta who is dispatched to Australia to find out why one district drinks absolutely no Coke. The critic Jonathan Rosenbaum speaks of Makavejev's method as materials in collision; he combines documentary, fiction, found footage, direct narration, and patriotic music in ways startling and puzzling. The movie is about whatever impression you leave it with.

WR, for example, begins as a documentary about the Austrian analyst Wilhelm Reich, once Freud's first assistant, later a communist, later an anticommunist, eventually an American, who believed the orgasm was the key to freedom and happiness, and possibly a cure for disease. His Orgone Accumulator was a box the size of a phone booth, wood on the outside, lined with metal, which he believed concentrated orgasmic energy within anyone sitting inside of it. Reich's science was condemned by the FDA, his books were burned by the U.S. government, and he died in prison. You see how dangerous sex is.

Makavejev's film strays from Reich to investigate the wilder shores of modern sex. There is a sequence involving the once-infamous practice of "plaster casting." Reflections by the transvestite Jackie Curtis. Poetry (bad) by Tuli Kupferberg as he stalks Manhattan streets with a toy machinegun. And a fictional subplot about a love affair between a Yugoslavian named Milena (Milena Dravic) and the Russian figure skater Vladimir (Ivica Vidovic). After she supplies him with an orgasm, he chops off her head with one of his ice skates. ("Nickel-plated Champions," a cop says. "The finest made.") Not to worry: her severed head continues to speak.

To list WR as a great movie will stir outrage from some. "I never, in all my years of moviegoing, booed a film, no matter how bad, boring or insipid the film might have been," wrote David Bienstock in the New York Times. "Sometimes the crime being committed in the name of cinema seemed outrageous enough to justify such a response, but I restrained myself." WR offended him principally because of its distortions of the teachings of Reich, which he felt amounted to character assassination. That Bienstock took the film as being serious about Reich, or anything else, is surprising.

"Collage," Rosenbaum calls Makavejev's style. Yes. Materials from anywhere come together to create whatever it is you get from it. The movie embodies the very essence of the hippie and flower-power period, which is maybe why it was a box-office hit (the nudity and X rating didn't hurt, although there is no specifically erotic material). It is as evocative of its time as Woodstock. I think Makavejev's purpose is to ridicule authorities in the areas of sex and politics (Stalin comes in for some rough sledding), and to suggest we'd get along just fine without anyone issuing us instructions in either area.

Movies like this are impossible now, unless they are made marginally, on small indie budgets. Makavejev's own later films had stars like Roberts and Greta Scacchi, and I liked them, and they made money, but they lacked the anarchy. He hasn't made a feature in ten years, but is still a frequent visitor and juror at film festivals, where somehow he seems to be the host. In recent years he has taught at Harvard.

The editions of Makavejev's films in the Criterion Collection include fascinating supplementary material, not least a little documentary on the "improved" version of WR. The movie was purchased by the BBC's Channel Four, which asked Makavejev to reedit some of the more graphic scenes. He was happy to oblige. Key elements of the "plaster casting" scene are obscured by starbursts of psychedelic colors. And an opening nude sequence from an old silent sex film is tidied up with goldfish swimming past the crucial areas.

There is also Makavejev's own short doc about the experience of leaving the dissolving Yugoslavia and finding himself in Hollywood. Monique Luddy, wife of the co-founder of the Telluride Film Festival, takes him to buy some trendy clothes. He looks dubiously at a colorful shirt. She encourages him: "If the producer doesn't like you, maybe he'll like the shirt."


Перейти на страницу:

Похожие книги

Публичное одиночество
Публичное одиночество

Что думает о любви и жизни главный режиссер страны? Как относится мэтр кинематографа к власти и демократии? Обижается ли, когда его называют барином? И почему всемирная слава всегда приводит к глобальному одиночеству?..Все, что делает Никита Михалков, вызывает самый пристальный интерес публики. О его творчестве спорят, им восхищаются, ему подражают… Однако, как почти каждого большого художника, его не всегда понимают и принимают современники.Не случайно свою книгу Никита Сергеевич назвал «Публичное одиночество» и поделился в ней своими размышлениями о самых разных творческих, культурных и жизненных вопросах: о вере, власти, женщинах, ксенофобии, монархии, великих актерах и многом-многом другом…«Это не воспоминания, написанные годы спустя, которых так много сегодня и в которых любые прошлые события и лица могут быть освещены и представлены в «нужном свете». Это документированная хроника того, что было мною сказано ранее, и того, что я говорю сейчас.Это жестокий эксперимент, но я иду на него сознательно. Что сказано – сказано, что сделано – сделано».По «гамбургскому счету» подошел к своей книге автор. Ну а что из этого получилось – судить вам, дорогие читатели!

Никита Сергеевич Михалков

Кино