Читаем Us полностью

I rarely encounter a fruit fly now, outside of a bowl of fruit. These days I work in the private, commercial sector — ‘the evil corporation’, my son calls it — as Head of Research and Development, a rather grand title but one that means I no longer experience the freedom and excitement of fundamental science. These days my position is organisational, strategical, words like that. We fund university research in order to make the most of academic expertise, innovation and enthusiasm, but everything must be ‘translational’ now; there must be some practical application. I enjoy the work, am good at it and I still visit labs, but now I am employed to co-ordinate and manage younger people who do the work that I used to do. I am not some corporate monster; I am good at my job and it has brought success and security. But it doesn’t thrill me like it used to.

Because it was thrilling, to be working all those hours with a small group of committed, impassioned people. Science seemed exhilarating to me then, inspiring and essential. Twenty years on, those experiments on fruit flies would lead to medical innovations that we could never have imagined, but at the time we were motivated by pure curiosity, almost by a sense of play. It was just terrific fun, and it would not be an exaggeration to say that I loved my subject.

That’s not to say there wasn’t a great deal of mundane graft involved, too; computers were temperamental and rudimentary, barely more than unwieldy calculators and considerably less powerful than the phone in my pocket now, and data input was exhausting and laborious. And while the common fruit fly has a great deal in its favour as an experimental organism — fecundity, a short breeding cycle, distinctive morphology — it has little in the way of personality. We kept one as a pet in our lab’s insectory, in its own special jar with a tiny rug and doll’s house furniture, replacing it at the end of each life cycle. Though it’s tricky to sex a fruit fly, we called him/her Bruce. Allow this to stand as the archetypal example of Biochemist Humour.

Such small diversions were necessary because anaesthetising a population of Drosophila, then examining them one by one with a fine brush and a microscope, looking for tiny changes in eye pigmentation or wing shape, is frankly mind-numbing. It’s a little like embarking on an immense jigsaw. To begin with you think ‘this will be fun’ and you put on the radio and make a pot of tea, before realising that there are far too many pieces, nearly all of them sky.

Consequently I was far too tired to go to my sister’s party on that Friday night. And not just tired, I was wary too, for a number of good reasons.

7. the matchmaker

I was wary of my sister’s cooking, which invariably consisted of a tubular pasta and economy cheese, charred black on the surface, with either tinned tuna or lardy mince lurking beneath the molten crust. I was wary because parties, and dinner parties in particular, had always seemed to be a pitiless form of gladiatorial combat, with laurel garlands bestowed to the most witty, successful and attractive, and the corpses of the defeated lying bleeding on the painted floorboards. The pressure to be one’s best self in such circumstances I found paralysing, and still do, yet my sister insisted on forcing me into the arena again and again.

‘You can’t stay at home for the rest of your life, D.’

‘I don’t stay at home, I’m hardly here …’

‘Sat in that misery hole, all by yourself.’

‘It’s not a … I’m perfectly happy by myself, Karen.’

‘You’re not happy! You’re not! How can you be happy, D? You’re not happy! You are not!’

And it was true that there was not a great deal of glee before that February night, little cause for fireworks or the punching of air. I liked my colleagues, they liked me, but for the most part, I would say goodbye to Security Steve on a Saturday afternoon then not speak until my lips parted with an audible pop on the Monday morning as I greeted him hello. ‘Good weekend, Douglas?’ he’d ask. ‘Oh, quiet, Steve, very quiet.’ Still, there was pleasure and satisfaction in my work, a pub quiz once a month, the pint with my colleagues on a Friday night, and if I did occasionally suspect something was missing, well — didn’t everyone?

Not my sister. In her mid-twenties Karen was promiscuous in her friendships and ran with what my parents referred to as ‘an arty crowd’: would-be actors, playwrights and poets, musicians, dancers, glamorous young people pursuing impractical careers, staying up late then meeting for long and emotional cups of tea during all hours of the working day. For my sister, life was one long group hug and it seemed to amuse her in some obscure way to parade me in front of her younger friends. She liked to say that I had skipped youth and leapt straight into middle age, that I had been forty-three in my mother’s womb, and it was true, I suppose, that I’d never got the hang of being young. In which case why was she so desperate for me to come along?

Перейти на страницу:

Похожие книги

Точка опоры
Точка опоры

В книгу включены четвертая часть известной тетралогия М. С. Шагинян «Семья Ульяновых» — «Четыре урока у Ленина» и роман в двух книгах А. Л. Коптелова «Точка опоры» — выдающиеся произведения советской литературы, посвященные жизни и деятельности В. И. Ленина.Два наших современника, два советских писателя - Мариэтта Шагинян и Афанасий Коптелов,- выходцы из разных слоев общества, люди с различным трудовым и житейским опытом, пройдя большой и сложный путь идейно-эстетических исканий, обратились, каждый по-своему, к ленинской теме, посвятив ей свои основные книги. Эта тема, говорила М.Шагинян, "для того, кто однажды прикоснулся к ней, уже не уходит из нашей творческой работы, она становится как бы темой жизни". Замысел создания произведений о Ленине был продиктован для обоих художников самой действительностью. Вокруг шли уже невиданно новые, невиданно сложные социальные процессы. И на решающих рубежах истории открывалась современникам сила, ясность революционной мысли В.И.Ленина, энергия его созидательной деятельности.Афанасий Коптелов - автор нескольких романов, посвященных жизни и деятельности В.И.Ленина. Пафос романа "Точка опоры" - в изображении страстной, непримиримой борьбы Владимира Ильича Ленина за создание марксистской партии в России. Писатель с подлинно исследовательской глубиной изучил события, факты, письма, документы, связанные с биографией В.И.Ленина, его революционной деятельностью, и создал яркий образ великого вождя революции, продолжателя учения К.Маркса в новых исторических условиях. В романе убедительно и ярко показаны не только организующая роль В.И.Ленина в подготовке издания "Искры", не только его неустанные заботы о связи редакции с русским рабочим движением, но и работа Владимира Ильича над статьями для "Искры", над проектом Программы партии, над книгой "Что делать?".

Афанасий Лазаревич Коптелов , Виль Владимирович Липатов , Дмитрий Громов , Иван Чебан , Кэти Тайерс , Рустам Карапетьян

Фантастика / Современная русская и зарубежная проза / Современная проза / Cтихи, поэзия / Проза / Советская классическая проза