Введение в Новый Завет Том II

Barrett, C. K. (NClarBC, 1963); Davies, M. (ЕС, 1996; NTG, 1996); Dibelius, M., and H. Conzelmann (Hermeneia, 1972); Donelson, L. R. (WBComp, 1996); Fee, G. D. (NIBC, 1988); Fuller, R. H. (ProcC, 1978); Guthrie, D. (TNTC, 1957); Hanson, A. T. (NCBC, 1982); Houlden, J. L. (PC, 1976); Hultgren, A. J.(AugC, 1984) Johnson, L. T. (NTIC, 1996); Karris, R. J. (NTM, 1979); Kelly J. N. D. (HNTC, 1960); Knight, G. W. (NIGTC, 1992); Lock, W. (ICC, 1924); Oden, T. (IBC, 1989); Quinn, J. D. (Titus; AB, 1990); Taylor, FT, Jr. (ProcC, 1993); Young, FM. (NTT, 1994).

Barrett, C. K., "Pauline Controversies in the Post-Pauline Period," NTS 20 (1973–1974), 229–245.

—, "Titus," Neotestamentica el Semitica (M. Black Festschrift; Edinburgh: Clark, 1969), 1–14.

Bratcher, R. G., A Translator's Guide to Paul's Letters to Timothy and Titus (New York: United Bible Societies, 1983).

Brown, L. A., "Asceticism and Ideology: The Language of Power in the Pastoral Epistles," Semeia 57 (1992), 77–94.

Brown, R. E., "The Pauline Heritage in the Pastorals: Church Structure," BCALB 31–46.

Collins, R. F, "The Image of Paul in the Pastorals," Laval th'eologique et philosophique 31 (1975), 147–173.

—, "The Pastoral Epistles," CLPDNW 88–130.

Colson, F. H., "Myths and Genealogies — A Note on the Polemic of the Pastoral Epistles," JTS 19 (1917–1918), 265–271.

Donelson, L. R., Pseudepigraphy and Ethical Argument in the Pastoral Epistles (T"ubingen: Mohr-Siebeck, 1986).

Elliott, J. K., The Greek Text of the Epistles to Timothy and Titus (Salt Lake City: Univ. of Utah, 1968).

Ellis, E. E., "The Authorship of the Pastoral Epistles," Paul and His Recent Interpreters (Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 1961), 49–57.

Fiore, ., The Function of Personal Example in the Socratic and Pastoral Epistles (AnBib 105; Rome: PBI, 1986).

Grayston, К., and G. Herdan, "The Pastorals in the Light of Statistical Linguistics," NTS 6 (1959–1960), 1–15.

Hanson, A. T., Studies in the Pastoral Epistles (London: SPCK, 1968).

—, "The Use of the Old Testament in the Pastoral Epistles," IBS 3 (1981), 203–219.

—, "The Domestication of Paul," BJRL 63 (1981), 402–418. Harrison, P. N., The Problem of the Pastoral Epistles (Oxford Univ., 1921).

—, Paulines and Pastorals (London: Villiers, 1964).

Lemaire, ., "Pastoral Epistles: Redaction and Theology," BTB 2 (1972), 25–42.

Malherbe, AJ., "Medical Imagery in the Pastorals," in Texts and Testaments, ed. W. E. March (San Antonio: Trinity Univ., 1980), 19–35.

Metzger, . ., ' Reconsideration of Certain Arguments against the Pauline Authorship of the Pastoral Epistles," ExpTim 70 (1958–1959), 91–94.

Morton, A. Q., S. Michaelson, and J. D. Thompson, A Critical Concordance to the Pastoral Epistles (Wooster, OH: Biblical Research, 1982).

Moule, CED., "The Problem of the Pastoral Epistles: A Reappraisal," BJRL 47 (1965), 430–452.

Rogers, P. V., "The Pastoral Epistles as Deutero-Pauline," ITQ45 (1978), 248–260.

Soards, M. L., "Refraining and Reevaluating the Argument of the Pastoral Epistles toward a Contemporary New Testament Theology," in Perspectives on Contemporary New Testament Questions, ed. E. V. McKnight (T. C. Smith Festschrift; Lewiston, NY: Mellen, 1992), 49–62.

Towner, P. H., "The Present Age in the Eschatology of the Pastoral Epistles," NTS 32 (1986), 427–448.

Verner, D. C., The Household of God: The Social World of the Pastoral Epistles (SBLDS 71; Chico, CA: Scholars, 1983).

Wild, R. A., "The Image of Paul in the Pastoral Letters," TBT 23 (1985), 239–245.

Wilson, S. G., Luke and the Pastoral Epistles (London: SPCK, 1979).

Ziesler, J. A., "Which Is the Best Commentary? X. The Pastoral Epistles," ExpTim 99 (1987–1988), 264–267.

Глава 30 Пастырские письма: Первое письмо к Тимофею

В канон НЗ включены два письма к этому ученику Павла, но ни в одном из них нет ни малейшей оговорки о существовании другого письма (ср. 2 Петр 3:1). Слово «первое» говорит не о том, что письмо с таким названием было написано первым, но что оно превосходит по объему другое письмо соответственно названное «вторым». Тема 1 Тим напоминает нам о Тит, но опять же ничто в этих письмах не показывает прямой взаимосвязи двух писем, не знаем мы также и о том, какое же из трех писем было написано первым.