Chernin E. Richard Pearson Strong and the Iatrogenic Plague Disaster in Bilibid Prison, Manila,
1906 // Reviews of Infectious Diseases. 1989. November-December. Vol. 11. № 6. P. 996–1004.The Lübeck catastrophe
// British Medical Journal. 1931. June 6. Vol. 1. P. 986.Vollmann J., Winau R. Nuremberg doctors’ trial: informed consent in human experimentation before the Nuremberg code
// BMJ. 1996. December 7. Vol. 313. № 7070. P. 1445–1447.Langer E. Human experimentation: Cancer studies at Sloan-Kettering stir public debate on medical ethics
// Science. 1964. February 7. Vol. 143. № 3606. P. 551–553.Thomas S. B., Quinn S. C. The Tuskegee Syphilis Study,
1932 to 1972: implications for HIV education and AIDS risk education programs in the black community // American Journal of Public Health. 1991. November. Vol. 81. № 11. P. 1498–1505.Brandt A. M. Racism and research: The case of the Tuskegee Syphilis study
// The Hastings Center Report. 1978. Vol. 8. № 6. P. 21–29.Corbie-Smith G. The continuing legacy of the Tuskegee Syphilis Study: Considerations for clinical investigation
// The American Journal of the Medical Sciences. 1999. January. Vol. 317. № 1. P. 5–8.Reverby S. M. More than fact and fiction: Cultural memory and the Tuskegee syphilis study
// The Hastings Center Report. 2001. September-October. Vol. 31. № 5. P. 22–28.Annas G. J. The changing landscape of human experimentation: Nuremberg, Helsinki and Beyond
// Health Matrix: The Journal of Law-Medicine. 1992. Vol. 2. № 2. P. 119–140.Seidelman W. E. Nuremberg lamentation: for the forgotten victims ofmedical science
// BMJ. 1996. December 7. Vol. 313. № 7070. P. 1463–1467.Trials of War Criminals before the Nuremberg Military Tribunals under Control Council Law No.
10. Washington, D. C.: U. S. Government Printing Office, 1949. Vol. 2. P. 181–182.Public health
// JAMA. 1896. June 6. Vol. XXVI. № 23. P. 1138–1140.Report IV. Contemporary Issues in Medicine: Basic Science and Clinical Research
. Medical School Objectives Project, 2001.Millum J., Grady C. The ethics of placebo-controlled trials: methodological justifications
// Contemporary clinical trials. 2013. November. Vol. 36. № 2. P. 510–514.Challenging ethical issues in contemporary research on human beings
. National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC). Canberra, ACT: Australian Government, 2007.Hiltner S. The Tuskegee Syphilis Study under review
// Christian century. 1973. November 28. Vol. 90. № 43. P. 1174–1176.Howard-Jones N. Human experimentation in historical and ethical perspectives
// Social Science & Medicine. 1982. Vol. 16. № 15. P. 1429–1448.Bernstein J. E. Ethical considerations in human experimentation
// Journal of clinical pharmacology. 1975. August- September. Vol. 15. № 8–9. P. 579–590.Katz R. V. The legacy of the Tuskegee Syphilis Study: assessing its impact on willingness to participate in biomedical studies
// Journal of health care for the poor and underserved. 2008. November. Vol. 19. № 4. P. 1168–1180.Rasko J., Power C. Dr Con Man: the rise and fall of a celebrity scientist who fooled almost everyone
// The Guardian. 2017. September 1.The Macchiarini case: investigation of the synthetic trachea transplantations at Karolinska University Hospital
. 2016. August 31.Novella S. Selling Stem Cell Hype
// Skeptical Inquirer. 2011. September/October. Vol. 35.5.