Shuster E. Fifty years later: The significance of the Nuremberg Code
// The New England Journal of Medicine. 1997. November. Vol. 337. P. 1436–1440.The Human Radiation Experiments: Final Report of the Advisory Committee on Human Radiation Experiments
. Oxford University Press, 1996.Киселев В. А. Биоэтический словарь
. 2-е изд., испр. и доп. Екатеринбург: УГМА, 2006Часть четвертая
Vineis P. History of bias
// Sozial-und Präventivmedizin. 2002. September. Vol. 47. № 3. P. 156–161.Buck C., Llopis A. et al. The challenge of epidemiology: issues and selected readings
. Pan American Health Org, 1988.Karamanou M., Panayiotakopoulos G., Tsoucalas G., Kousoulis A., Androutsos G. From miasmas to germs: a historical approach to theories of infectious disease transmission
// Le Infezioni in Medicina. 2012. March. Vol. 20. № 1. P. 58–62.Sterner C. S. Brief history of miasmic theory
// Bulletin of the History of Medicine. 1948. Vol. 22.Юркова З. В. Сенная площадь. Вчера, сегодня, завтра
. М.: Центрполиграф, 2011.Bosin Y. V. Russia, cholera riots of
1830–1831 / Ness I. ed. International Encyclopedia of Revolution and Protest. Blackwell Publishing, 2009. P. 2877–2878.McGrew R. E. The first Russian cholera epidemic: themes and opportunities
// Bulletin of the History of Medicine. 1962. January 1. Vol. 36. P. 220.Snow J. The cholera at Albion terrace
// London Medical Gazette. 1849. September. Vol. 44. P. 504–505.Hill A. B. Snow – An Appreciation
// Proceedings of the Royal Society of Medicine. 1955. Vol. 48. P. 1008–1012.Parkes E. A. Mode of Communication of Cholera. By John Snow, MD: Second Edition – London,
1855, pp 162 // International Journal of Epidemiology. 2013. Vol. 42. № 6. P. 1543–1552.Snow J. On the mode of communication of cholera
. John Churchill, 1855.Budd W. Malignant Cholera: its cause, mode of propagation, and prevention
// International Journal of Epidemiology. 2013. Vol. 42. № 6. P. 1567–1575.Smith G. D. Commentary: Behind the Broad Street pump: aetiology, epidemiology and prevention of cholera in mid-
19th century Britain // International Journal of Epidemiology. 2002. October. Vol. 31. № 5. P. 920–932.Ackerknecht E. H. Anticontagionism between
1821 and 1867: The Fielding H. Garrison Lecture // International Journal of Epidemiology. 2009. February. Vol. 38. № 1. P. 7–21.Koch R. An address on cholera and its bacillus
// British Medical Journal. 1884. September. Vol. 2. № 1236. P. 453–459.Howard-Jones N. Robert Koch and the cholera vibrio: a centenary
// British medical journal (Clinical research ed.). 1984. February 4. Vol. 288. № 6414. P. 379–381.Blevins S. M., Bronze M. S. Robert Koch and the ‘golden age’ of bacteriology
// International Journal of Infectious Diseases. 2010. September. Vol. 14. № 9, e744–751.Barua D. The global epidemiology of cholera in recent years
// Proceedings of the Royal Society of Medicine. 1972. May. Vol. 65. № 5. P. 423–428.Cholera vaccines: WHO position paper
// Weekly Epidemiological Record. 2010. Vol. 85. № 13. P.117–128.Rothman K. J., Greenland S. Types of Epidemiologic Studies
/ Rothman K. J., Greenland S. Modern Epidemiology. 2nd ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 1998. P. 67–78.Vandenbroucke J. P., Pearce N. Case – control studies: basic concepts
// International Journal of Epidemiology. 2012. Vol. 41. № 5. P. 1480–1489.Rubin D. B. Estimating causal effects of treatments in randomized and nonrandomized studies
// Journal of Educational Psychology. 1974. Vol. 66. № 5. P. 688–701.Parascandola M. Two approaches to etiology: the debate over smoking and lung cancer in the
1950s // Endeavour. 2004. June. Vol. 28. № 2. P. 81–86.