Васильев А. Н., Ниязов Р. Р., Гавришина Е. В., Драницына М. А., Куличев Д. А. Проблемы планирования и проведения доклинических исследований в Российской Федерации
// Ремедиум. 2017. № 9. C. 6–18.Ganellin R., Roberts S. M., Jefferies R. (eds.) Introduction to biological and small molecule drug research and development, theory and case studies
. New York: Academic Press, 2013.Patnaik A., Kang S. P., Rasco D., Papadopoulos K. P., Elassaiss-Schaap J. et al. Phase I Study of Pembrolizumab (MK-
3475; Anti-PD-1 Monoclonal Antibody) in Patients With Advanced Solid Tumors // Clinical Cancer Research. 2015. Vol. 21. № 19. P. 4286–4293.Wong C. H., Siah K. W., Lo A. W. Estimation of clinical trial success rates and related parameters
// Biostatistics. 2018. January.Lounnas V., Ritschel T., Kelder J., McGuire R., Bywater R. P., Foloppe N. Current progress in Structure-Based Rational Drug Design marks a new mindset in drug discovery
// Computational and structural biotechnology journal. 2013. Vol. 5. № 6, e201302011.Thomas D. W., Burns J., Audette J., Carroll A., Dow-Hygelund C., Hay M. Clinical development success rates
2006–2015. Biotechnology Innovation Organization. 2016. June. P. 8.Paul S. M., Mytelka D. S., Dunwiddie C. T., Persinger C. C., Munos B. H. et al. How to improve R&D productivity: the pharmaceutical industry’s grand challenge
// Nature Reviews Drug Discovery. 2010. March. Vol. 9. № 3. P. 203–214.Schuhmacher A., Gassmann O., Hinder M. Changing R&D models in research-based pharmaceutical companies
// Journal of translational medicine. 2016. Vol. 14. № 1. P. 105.Arrowsmith J., Miller P. Trial watch: phase II and phase III attrition rates
2011–2012 // Nature reviews Drug discovery. 2013. August. Vol. 12. № 8. P. 569.Chrisafis A. French drug trial leaves one brain dead and five critically ill
// The Guardian. 2016. January 15.Symons X. Catastrophic result in clinical trial in France
// BioEdge. 2016. January17.Allen F. ‘Like a horror film’. What was the ‘Elephant Man’ drug testing trial, what is TGN
1412 and what happened to the men involved? // The Sun. 2017. February.Attarwala H. TGN
1412: From discovery to disaster // Journal of young pharmacists. 2010. July-September. Vol. 2. № 3. P. 332–336.Tyrsin D., Chuvpilo S., Matskevich A., Nemenov D., Römer P. S., Tabares P., Hünig T. From TGN
1412 to TAB08: the return of CD28 superagonist therapy to clinical development for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis // Clinical and experimental rheumatology. 2016. July/August. Vol. 34. № 4 (Suppl 98). P. 45–48.Hünig T. The rise and fall of the CD
28 superagonis t TGN1412 and its return as TAB08: a personal account // The FEBS Journal. 2016. Vol. 283. P. 3325–3334.Frankos V. H. FDA perspectives on the use of teratology data for human risk assessment
// Fundamental and Applied Toxicology. 1985. August. Vol. 5. № 4. P. 615–625.Schardein J. L. Chemically induced birth defects
. New York: Marcel Dekker Inc, 1993.Lumley C., Walker S. (eds.). Animal toxicity studies: their relevance for man
. London: Quay, 1990. P. 49–56.Matthews R. A. J. Medical progress depends on animal models – doesn’t it?
// Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine. 2008. February. Vol. 101. № 2. P. 95–98.Jones C. A., Watson D. J. G., Fone K. C. F. Animal models of schizophrenia
// British journal of pharmacology. 2011. October. Vol. 164. № 4. P. 1162–1194.