Stebbings R., Findlay L., Edwards C., Eastwood D., Bird C., North D., Mistry Y.et al. “Cytokine storm” in the phase I trial of monoclonal antibody TGN
1412: better understanding the causes to improve preclinical testing of immunotherapeutics // The Journal of Immunology. 2007. Vol. 179. № 5. P. 3325–3331.Suntharalingam G., Perry M. R., Ward S., Brett S. J., Castello-Cortes A. et al. Cytokine storm in a phase
1 trial of the anti-CD28 monoclonal antibody TGN1412 // The New England Journal of Medicine. 2006. Vol. 355. № 10. P. 1018–1028.Greek R., Shanks N., Rice M. J. The history and implications of testing thalidomide on animals
// The Journal of Philosophy, Science & Law. 2011. October. Vol. 11. № 3. P. 1–32.Brent R. L. Drug testing in animals for teratogenic effects: Thalidomide in the pregnant rat
// The Journal of Pediatrics. 1964. May. Vol. 64. № 5. P. 762–770.BaileyJ., Knight A., Balcombe J. The future of teratology research is in vitro
// Biogenic Amines. 2005. Vol. 19. № 2. P. 97–145.Nelson-Rees W. A., Daniels D. W., Flandermeyer R. R. Cross-contamination of cells in culture
// Science. 1981. April 24. Vol. 212. № 4493. P. 446–452.Nelson-Rees W. A., Flandermeyer R. R. Inter- and intraspecies contamination of human breast tumor cell lines HBC and BrCa
5 and other cell cultures // Science. 1977. March 25. Vol. 195. № 4284. P. 1343–1344.Lucey B. P., Nelson-Rees W. A., Hutchins G. M. Henrietta Lacks, HeLa cells, and cell culture contamination
// The Archives of Pathology & Laboratory Medicine. 2009. Vol. 133. № 9. P. 1463–1467.Neimark J. Line of attack. Christopher Korch is adding up the costs of contaminated cell lines
// Science. 2015. February 27. Vol. 347. № 6225. P. 938–940.Travis K. For phase I studies, ethical and practical concerns abound
// Journal of the National Cancer Institute. 2004. September 15. Vol. 96. № 18. P. 1354–1355.Romm C. The life of a professional guinea pig
// The Atlantic. 2015. September 23.Lemmens T., Elliott C. Justice for the Professional Guinea Pig
// The American Journal of Bioethics. 2001. Vol. 1. № 2. P. 51–53.Philippidis A. Unlucky
13: top clinical trial failures of 2017 // GEN. 2018. January 3.Boolell M., Allen M. J., Ballard S. A., Gepi-Attee S., Muirhead G. J. et al. Sildenafil: an orally active type
5 cyclic GMP-specific phosphodiesterase inhibitor for the treatment of penile erectile dysfunction // International Journal of Impotence Research. 1996. June 1. Vol. 8. № 2. P. 47–52.Couzin-Frankel J. Hope in a mouse
// Science. 2014. October 03. Vol. 346. № 6205. P. 28–29.Benjamin D. J., Berger J. O., Johnson V. E. Redefine statistical significance
// Nature Human Behaviour. 2018. Vol. 2. № 1. P. 6–10.Ioannidis J. P. A. Why most published research findings are false
// PLoS Medicine. 2005. August 30. Vol. 2. № 8, e124.Lakens D., Adolfi F. G., Albers C. J., Anvari F., Apps M. A. et al. Justify Your Alpha
// Nature Human Behaviour. 2018. March 1. Vol. 2. № 3. P. 168–171.Рубанович А. В. Пересмотр критического уровня значимости (
0.005 вместо 0.05): байесовский след // Радиационная биология. Радиоэкология. 2018. Т. 58. № 5. C. 453–463.Head M. L., Holman L., Lanfear R., Kahn A. T., Jennions M. D. The extent and consequences of p-hacking in science
// PLoS Biology. 2015. Vol. 13. № 3, e1002106.Jager L. R., Leek J. T. An estimate of the science-wise false discovery rate and application to the top medical literature
// Biostatistics. 2014. January 1. Vol. 15. № 1. P. 1–12.