Анастас Иванович Микоян: человек и политик

Перевод с английского. Оригинал: https://www.cleveland.com/opinion/2019/oi/cleveland-visit-6o-years-ag.

Сведения об авторах

Животич Александр — профессор кафедры Истории Югославии Философского факультета Университета в Белграде (Республика Сербия)

Конорев Максим Эдуардович — кандидат педагогических наук, специалист в области применения информационных технологий в учебном процессе в высших учебных заведениях (Курск).

Конорева Ирина Александровна — доктор исторических наук, профессор, декан исторического факультета Курского государственного университета (Курск)

Селиванов Игорь Николаевич — доктор исторических наук, профессор, заведующий кафедрой всеобщей истории Курского государственного университета (Курск)

Стыкалин Александр Сергеевич — кандидат исторических наук, ведущий научный сотрудник Института славяноведения РАН (Москва)

Summary

Anastas I. Mikoyan: Man and Politician

The book contains information on the professional and personal life of the famous Soviet Union politician, Anastas Mikoyan (1895–1978). The author reviewed the main stages of his political biography, and his participation in the formation of the domestic and foreign policy of the USSR. The previously unpublished archival materials: memoirs of contemporaries, interviews with members of his family, as well as materials for the sake of preserving the historical memory of Mikoyan create separate sections of the book. The book consists of three main sections. The first includes scientific articles by historians from Russia and Serbia. The following section represents a collection of materials related to the archives. It provides an overview of the resources of the Archive of the President of the Russian Federation (AP RF), the Russian State Archive of Social and Political History (RGASPI) and the State Archive of the Russian Federation (GARF); and presents commented materials related to Mikoyan’s activities to normalize Soviet-Chinese relations in 1964–1965. The third section contains materials related to the preservation of the historical memory of Mikoyan. The appendix contains fragments of previously published interviews with Mikoyan’s family members, and excerpts from the memories of people who personally worked or communicated with him, as well as illustrations. The book is addressed to experts in Soviet history, teachers, graduate students, students, as well as everyone who is interested in this period of Soviet national history.

Abstracts and keywords of authors’ articles and publications in Sections 1–3

Selivanov I. N.

1.1. Anastas I. Mikoyan: some elements of the political portrait in the realities of the Soviet Leftist Project

Abstract. The author considers the main stages of the professional and personal life of Anastas I. Mikoyan who held key posts in the party-State system of the USSR for several decades. They show his great contribution to the development of Soviet domestic and foreign policy, and discuss various assessments of his activities in domestic and foreign historiography, and journalism.

Keywords: man in history, Soviet Leftist Project, Anastas Mikoyan, domestic policy of the USSR, foreign policy of the USSR, historiography of USSR history.

* * *

Životić A.

1.2. Anastas Mikoyan and the Yugoslav-Soviet trade negotiations in 1940

Abstract. Using the Yugoslav and Soviet archival sources, as well as memoirs and historical literature, the author examines the reasons that led to the Yugoslav-Soviet trade negotiations in early May 1940, and the role of Anastas Mikoyan in their holding. The article contains the author’s assessment of the importance of his personal contribution to the complete normalization of Yugoslav-Soviet relations.

Keywords: Yugoslavia, Soviet Union, Anastas Mikoyan, Milorad Djord-jevic, Yugoslav-Soviet trade relations.

* * *

Stykalin A. S.

1.3. Our party and fraternal parties are concerned about the fate of Hungary, A. I. Mikoyan and attempts to resolve the Hungarian uprising of 1956

Abstract. One of the key episodes of Anastas Mikoyan’s international activities associated with his attempts to peacefully settle the political crisis in Hungary in the summer and autumn of 1956 is analyzed using historical sources, primarily archival documents. The author provides the reasons why he failed to do so.