"I meant—" Balph Eubank started angrily and closed his mouth; he saw the eager interest on the faces of his audience, but it was not interest in philosophy any longer.
"Why, hello, Professor!" said Francisco, bowing to Dr. Pritchett.
There was no pleasure in Dr. Pritchett's face when he answered the greeting and performed a few introductions.
"We were just discussing a most interesting subject," said the earnest matron. "Dr. Pritchett was telling us that nothing is anything."
"He should, undoubtedly, know more than anyone else about that,"
Francisco answered gravely.
"I wouldn't have supposed that you knew Dr. Pritchett so well, Senor d'Anconia," she said, and wondered why the professor looked displeased by her remark.
"I am an alumnus of the great school that employs Dr. Pritchett at present, the Patrick Henry University. But I studied under one of his predecessors—Hugh Akston."
"Hugh Akston!" the attractive young woman gasped. "But you couldn't have, Senor d'Anconia! You're not old enough. I thought he was one of those great names of . . . of the last century."
"Perhaps in spirit, madame. Not in fact."
"But I thought he died years ago."
"Why, no. He is still alive."
"Then why don't we ever hear about him any more?"
"He retired, nine years ago."
"Isn't it odd? When a politician or a movie star retires, we read front page stories about it. But when a philosopher retires, people do not even notice it."
"They do, eventually."
A young man said, astonished, "I thought Hugh Akston was one of those classics that nobody studied any more, except in histories of philosophy. I read an article recently which referred to him as the last of the great advocates of reason."
"Just what did Hugh Akston teach?" asked the earnest matron.
Francisco answered, "He taught that everything is something."
"Your loyalty to your teacher is laudable, Senior d'Anconia," said Dr.
Pritchett dryly. "May we take it that you are an example of the practical results of his teaching?"
"I am."
James Taggart had approached the group and was waiting to be noticed.
"Hello, Francisco."
"Good evening, James."
"What a wonderful coincidence, seeing you here! I've been very anxious to speak to you."
"That's new. You haven't always been."
"Now you're joking, just like in the old days." Taggart was moving slowly, as if casually, away from the group, hoping to draw Francisco after him. "You know that there's not a person in this room who wouldn't love to talk to you."
"Really? I'd be inclined to suspect the opposite." Francisco had followed obediently, but stopped within hearing distance of the others.
"I have tried in every possible way to get in touch with you," said Taggart, "but . . . but circumstances didn't permit me to succeed."
"Are you trying to hide from me the fact that I refused to see you?"
"Well . . . that is . , . I mean, why did you refuse?"
"I couldn't imagine what you wanted to speak to me about."
"The San Sebastian Mines, of course!" Taggart's voice rose a little.
"Why, what about them?"
"But . . . Now, look, Francisco, this is serious. It's a disaster, an unprecedented disaster—and nobody can make any sense out of it. I don't know what to think. I don't understand it at all. I have a right to know."
"A right? Aren't you being old-fashioned, James? But what is it you want to know?"
"Well, first of all, that nationalization—what are you going to do about it?"
"Nothing."
"Nothing?!"
"But surely you don't want me to do anything about it. My mines and your railroad were seized by the will of the people. You wouldn't want me to oppose the will of the people, would you?"
"Francisco, this is not a laughing matter!"
"I never thought it was."
"I'm entitled to an explanation! You owe your stockholders an account of the whole disgraceful affair! Why did you pick a worthless mine? Why did you waste all those millions? What sort of rotten swindle was It?"
Francisco stood looking at him in polite astonishment. "Why, James," he said, "I thought you would approve of it."
"Approve?!"
"I thought you would consider the San Sebastian Mines as the practical realization of an ideal of the highest moral order. Remembering that you and I have disagreed so often in the past, I thought you would be gratified to see me acting in accordance with your principles."
"What are you talking about?"