Cole L.C.
The population consequences of life history phenomena // The Quarterly Review of Biology. 1954. V. 29. P. 103–137.Cook L.M.
Changing views on melanic moths // J Linn Soc. 2000. V. 69. P. 431–441.Cook L.M.
The rise and fall of the carbonaria form of the peppered moth // Q Rev Biol. 2003. V. 78. P. 399–417.Cook L.M., Askew R.R., Bishop J.A.
Increasing frequency of the typical form of the peppered moth in Manchester // Nature. 1970. V. 227. P. 1155.Cook L.M., Grant B.S., Saccheri I.J., Mallet J.
Selective bird predation on the peppered moth: the last experiment of Michael Majerus // Biol. Lett. 2012. V. 8. P. 609–612.Coyne J.A.
Not black and white // Nature. 1998. V. 396. P. 35–36.Cuevas J.M., Elena S.F., Moya A.
Molecular basis of adaptive convergence in experimental polulations of RNA viruses // Genetics. 2002. V. 162. № 2. P. 533–542.Czerkas S., Feduccia A.
Jurassic archosaur is a non-dinosaurian bird // Journal of Ornithology. 2014. V. 155. № 4. P. 841–851.Dakin R., Montgomerie R.
Peahens prefer peacocks displaying more eyespots, but rarely // Animal Behaviour. 2011. V. 82. № 1. P. 21–28.DasGupta S., Ferreira C.H., Miesenböck G.
FoxP influences the speed and accuracy of a perceptual decision in Drosophila // Science. 2014. V. 344. P. 901–904.Davalos L.M., Girranello A.L., Geisler J.H., Simmons N.B.
Understanding phylogenetic incongruence: lessons from phyllostomid bats // Biol. Rev. 2012. V. 87. P. 991–1024.Davis M.C., Dahn R.D., Shubin N.H.
An autopodial-like pattern of Hox expression in the fins of a basal actinopterygian fish // Nature. 2007. V. 447. P. 473–476.Davis B.W., Li G., Murphy W.J.
Supermatrix and species tree methods resolve phylogenetic relationships within the big cats, Panthera (Carnivora: Felidae) // Mol Phylogenet Evol. 2010. V. 56. № 1. P. 64–76.Dawkins R.
The Greatest Show on Earth: The Evidence for Evolution. Free Press, New York, 2009. 470 p.De Jong W.W.
Molecules remodel the mammalian tree // Trends Ecol Evol. 1998. V. 13. № 7. P. 270–275.Dugatkin L.A.
Interface between culturally based preferences and genetic preferences: Female mate choice in Poecilia reticulata // Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 1996. V. 93. P. 2770–2773.Dugatkin L.A.
Sexual selection and imitation: females copy the mate choice of others. // Am. Nat. 1992. V. 139. P. 1384–1389.Eakley A.L., Houde A.E.
Possible role of female discrimination against «redundant» males in the evolution of colour pattern polymorphism in guppies // Proc. Biol. Sci. 2004. V. 271. P. S299-S301.Endler J.A., Houde A.E.
Geographic variation in female preferences for male traits in Poecilia reticulata. // Evolution. 1995. V. 49. P. 456–468.Endler J.A.
Natural selection on color patterns in Poecilia reticulata // Evolution. 1980. V. 34. № 1. P. 76–91.Evans J.P., Bisazza A., Pilastro A.
Female mating preferences for colourful males in a population of guppies subject to high predation // Journal of Fish Biology. 2004. V. 65. P. 1154–1159.Everett A., Tong X., Briscoe A.D., Monteiro A.
Phenotypic plasticity in opsin expression in a butterfly compound eye complements sex role reversal // BMC Evolutionary Biology. 2012. V. 12. P. 232.Exnerova A., Svadova K., Fousova P., Fucikova E., Jezova D., Niederlova A., Kopeckova M., Stys P.
European birds and aposematic Heteroptera: review of comparative experiments // Bulletin of Insectology. 2008. V. 61. P. 163–165.Exnerova A., Svadova K.H., Fucikova E., Drent P., Stys P.
Personality matters: individual variation in reactions of naïve bird predators to aposematic prey // Proc. R. Soc. B. 2010. V. 277. P. 723–728.Farr J.A.
Male rarity or novelty, female choice behavior, and sexual selection in the guppy, Poecilia reticulata Peters (Pisces: Poeciliidae) // Evolution. 1977. V. 31. P. 162–168.Fay J.G., Wychkoff G.J., Wu C.-I.
Positive and negative selection on the human genom // Genetics. 2001. V. 158. P. 1227–1234.Fischer K., Perlick J., Galetz T.
Residual reproductive value and male mating success: older males do better // Proc. R. Soc. B. 2008. V. 275. P. 1517–1524.Forbush E.H., Fernald C.H.
The gypsy moth. Wright and Potter Printing Co, Boston. 1896.