Читаем Command and Control полностью

Louis Slotin was tickling the dragon in a laboratory at Los Alamos, carefully lowering a beryllium shell over the plutonium core of a Mark 3 implosion bomb. The beryllium served as a tamper; it reflected neutrons, increased the number of fissions, and brought the assembly closer to a chain reaction. The clicks of a Geiger counter gave an audible measure of how fast the fissions were multiplying. Slotin knew what he was doing. He’d assembled the core for the Trinity test and performed dozens of criticality experiments like this one. A coworker had asked to see how it was done and, on the spur of the moment, Slotin decided to show him. The core looked like an enormous gray pearl resting inside a shiny beryllium shell. Slotin used a screwdriver to lower the top half of that shell — and then, at about 3:20 in the afternoon on May 21, 1946, the screwdriver slipped, the shell shut, the core went supercritical, and a blue flash filled the room. Slotin immediately threw the top half of the tamper onto the floor, halting the chain reaction. But it was too late: he’d absorbed a lethal dose of radiation. And he, more than anyone else in the room, knew it.

Within hours Slotin was vomiting, his hands were turning red and swollen, his fingernails blue. General Groves flew Slotin’s parents down from Winnipeg on a military plane to say good-bye. A week later, Slotin was gone, and his death was excruciating, like so many tens of thousands at Hiroshima and Nagasaki had been. It was recorded on film, with his consent, as a sobering lesson on the importance of nuclear safety. Three of the other seven men in the lab that day eventually died of radiation-induced illnesses. But Slotin had added years to their lives by thinking quickly and stopping the chain reaction. In the absence of any fast-acting safety mechanism at the laboratory, a report on the accident later concluded, “Slotin was that safety device.”

The same plutonium core that took Slotin’s life had already killed one of his assistants, Harry Daghlian. The previous August, while Daghlian was performing an experiment, alone in the laboratory at night, a small tungsten brick slipped from his hand. The brick landed near the core, which became supercritical for a moment, and Daghlian was dead within a month. Having taken the lives of two promising young physicists, it was nicknamed “the Demon Core,” placed in a Mark 3 bomb, and detonated during a test at the Bikini atoll.

Slotin’s mishap was the fourth criticality accident at Los Alamos within a year, raising concern about the management practices at America’s nuclear weapon facilities. The reactors at Hanford were not only dangerous but largely incapable of making plutonium. Most of the famous scientists who’d worked on the Manhattan Project had left government service after the war. The manufacture of atomic bombs didn’t seem to be a wise career choice, at a time when the world appeared ready to ban them.

In April 1947, David Lilienthal visited Los Alamos for the first time after becoming head of the Atomic Energy Commission. He was shocked by what he saw: rudimentary equipment; dilapidated buildings; poor housing; muddy, unpaved roads — and plutonium cores stored in cages at an old icehouse. Lilienthal was a liberal, one of the last New Dealers in the Truman administration, and he’d seen a lot of rural poverty while running the Tennessee Valley Authority during the Great Depression. But that first day at Los Alamos, he later noted, was “one of the saddest days of my life.” Nuclear weapons were now thought indispensable for the defense of the United States; Lilienthal had expected to find them neatly and safely stored for immediate use. “The substantial stockpile of atom bombs we and the top military assumed was there, in readiness, did not exist,” Lilienthal subsequently wrote. “Furthermore, the production facilities that might enable us to produce quantities of atomic weapons… likewise did not exist.”

The number of atomic bombs in the American arsenal was considered so secret that it could not be shared with the Joint Chiefs of Staff — or even recorded on paper. After visiting Los Alamos, Lilienthal met with President Truman in the Oval Office and told him how many atomic bombs would be available in the event of a war with the Soviet Union: at most, one. The bomb was unassembled but, in Lilienthal’s view, “probably operable.” The president was stunned. He’d just announced the Truman Doctrine before Congress, vowing to contain the worldwide spread of communism. Admirals and generals were fighting over the atomic stockpile, completely unaware that there wasn’t one. “We not only didn’t have a pile,” Lilienthal recalled, “we didn’t have a stock.” The threat to destroy the Soviet Union, if it invaded Western Europe, was a bluff.

Перейти на страницу:

Похожие книги

Афганская война. Боевые операции
Афганская война. Боевые операции

В последних числах декабря 1979 г. ограниченный контингент Вооруженных Сил СССР вступил на территорию Афганистана «…в целях оказания интернациональной помощи дружественному афганскому народу, а также создания благоприятных условий для воспрещения возможных афганских акций со стороны сопредельных государств». Эта преследовавшая довольно смутные цели и спланированная на непродолжительное время военная акция на практике для советского народа вылилась в кровопролитную войну, которая продолжалась девять лет один месяц и восемнадцать дней, забрала жизни и здоровье около 55 тыс. советских людей, но так и не принесла благословившим ее правителям желанной победы.

Валентин Александрович Рунов

Военная документалистика и аналитика / История / Военная документалистика / Образование и наука / Документальное
«Умылись кровью»? Ложь и правда о потерях в Великой Отечественной войне
«Умылись кровью»? Ложь и правда о потерях в Великой Отечественной войне

День Победы до сих пор остается «праздником со слезами на глазах» – наши потери в Великой Отечественной войне были настолько велики, что рубец в народной памяти болит и поныне, а ожесточенные споры о цене главного триумфа СССР продолжаются по сей день: официальная цифра безвозвратных потерь Красной Армии в 8,7 миллиона человек ставится под сомнение не только профессиональными антисоветчиками, но и многими серьезными историками.Заваливала ли РККА врага трупами, как утверждают антисталинисты, или воевала умело и эффективно? Клали ли мы по три-четыре своих бойца за одного гитлеровца – или наши потери лишь на треть больше немецких? Умылся ли СССР кровью и какова подлинная цена Победы? Представляя обе точки зрения, эта книга выводит спор о потерях в Великой Отечественной войне на новый уровень – не идеологической склоки, а серьезной научной дискуссии. Кто из авторов прав – судить читателям.

Борис Константинович Кавалерчик , Виктор Николаевич Земсков , Игорь Васильевич Пыхалов , Игорь Иванович Ивлев , Лев Николаевич Лопуховский

Военная документалистика и аналитика
Берлин 45-го. Сражение в логове зверя
Берлин 45-го. Сражение в логове зверя

1945. Год Великой Победы. «Звездный час» советского народа. Дата величайшего триумфа в русской истории.Однако и сейчас, спустя 75 лет после Победы, финал Великой Отечественной, ожесточенная Битва за Берлин, вызывает множество вопросов.Каковы реальные потери в Берлинской операции?Можно ли было обойтись без штурма Зееловских высот?Действительно ли было «соревнование» между Жуковым и Коневым?И, наконец, а стоило ли вообще штурмовать Берлин?В предлагаемой книге ведущего военного историка Алексея Исаева не только скрупулезно анализируется ход Битвы за Берлин, но и дается объективная оценка действий сторон, неопровержимо доказывая, что Берлинская наступательная операция по праву считается одной из самых успешных и образцовых в истории.

Алексей Валерьевич Исаев

Военная документалистика и аналитика / Публицистика / Документальное