Читаем Fascist Pigs: Technoscientific Organisms and the History of Fascism полностью

The virus group (called the physiologic botany section of the botany department in 1934, and renamed the plant virus pathology section in 1943) was led by Erich Köhler, who had begun his career at the BRA in 1921 doing research on wart disease and then had turned to plant virology in 1932.[107] Köhler was celebrated for having introducing into Germany the notion—already in vogue in the Netherlands and the United States—that viruses were the pathogenic agents responsible for potato degeneration (Kartoffelabbaus), in contrast to ecological theories arguing that potato leaf roll was caused by environmental factors such as water imbalance.[108] In fact, the cause of potato degeneration was, from very early on, a major issue at the BRA, Otto Appel himself having published a leaflet on leaf roll differentiating it from the crinkle of the potato and making no mention of viruses. The concern about degeneration is not surprising. The yields of contaminated fields, according to the BRA numbers, were reduced by between 25 and 50 percent in the first year, and by more than 60 percent in subsequent years.[109]

In accordance with its usual approach, the BRA proposed a method to identify infected seeds so as to guarantee the distribution among German farmers of healthy material from commercial breeders. More important than maintaining old varieties in a virus-free state was to ensure that new seedlings that were hoped to be resistant to late blight would not be exposed to viruses in their early stages of multiplication. For this Köhler proposed the Stecklingsprobe (a variation of the Tuber Index Method developed by American scientists at Cornell University), which entailed removing and growing a seed piece from each individually numbered tuber selected from a stock.[110] The plants grown from these seeds were then observed for the presence of viruses. When the presence of a virus was confirmed, the diseased tuber was discarded. Only tubers corresponding to healthy plants were reproduced. Two central elements of the method are now familiar: careful recording of each tuber and the respective plant and allocation of greenhouse space for the quick growth of potato plants shortly after the harvesting of potatoes.

The main challenge presented by the method was detecting the presence of viruses quickly. If in some cases viruses manifested themselves through obvious leaf symptoms in an infected potato plant, latent viruses were made visible by rubbing tobacco plants with sap from the tuber seedlings.[111] From 1932 on, Köhler tinkered at the BRA with different combinations of viruses, potato varieties, and test plants, aiming to come up with an effective way of identifying viruses so as to guarantee the health of the certified stock seeds to be used by peasants.[112] Different test plants were tried for different types of viruses.[113] In addition to tobacco and pepper plants, the wild variety Solanum demissum was also found to be an effective test plant for the main types of viruses.[114]

Figure 3.10 The title page of the proceedings of a 1943 conference held by the Biologische Reichsanstalt für Land- und Forstwirtschaft. Note deletion of the swastika under the imperial eagle in this copy.(Virustagung der Biologischen Reichsanstalt für Land- und Forstwirtschaft am 23 januar 1943, Paul Parey, 1943)
Перейти на страницу:

Все книги серии Inside Technology

Fascist Pigs: Technoscientific Organisms and the History of Fascism
Fascist Pigs: Technoscientific Organisms and the History of Fascism

In the fascist regimes of Mussolini's Italy, Salazar's Portugal, and Hitler's Germany, the first mass mobilizations involved wheat engineered to take advantage of chemical fertilizers, potatoes resistant to late blight, and pigs that thrived on national produce. Food independence was an early goal of fascism; indeed, as Tiago Saraiva writes in Fascist Pigs, fascists were obsessed with projects to feed the national body from the national soil. Saraiva shows how such technoscientific organisms as specially bred wheat and pigs became important elements in the institutionalization and expansion of fascist regimes. The pigs, the potatoes, and the wheat embodied fascism. In Nazi Germany, only plants and animals conforming to the new national standards would be allowed to reproduce. Pigs that didn't efficiently convert German-grown potatoes into pork and lard were eliminated.Saraiva describes national campaigns that intertwined the work of geneticists with new state bureaucracies; discusses fascist empires, considering forced labor on coffee, rubber, and cotton in Ethiopia, Mozambique, and Eastern Europe; and explores fascist genocides, following Karakul sheep from a laboratory in Germany to Eastern Europe, Libya, Ethiopia, and Angola.Saraiva's highly original account — the first systematic study of the relation between science and fascism — argues that the "back to the land" aspect of fascism should be understood as a modernist experiment involving geneticists and their organisms, mass propaganda, overgrown bureaucracy, and violent colonialism.Inside Technologyedited by Wiebe E. Bijker, W. Bernard Carlson, and Trevor J. PinchA list of the series appears at the back of the book.

Tiago Saraiva

История

Похожие книги

1917: русская голгофа. Агония империи и истоки революции
1917: русская голгофа. Агония империи и истоки революции

В представленной книге крушение Российской империи и ее последнего царя впервые показано не с точки зрения политиков, писателей, революционеров, дипломатов, генералов и других образованных людей, которых в стране было меньшинство, а через призму народного, обывательского восприятия. На основе многочисленных архивных документов, журналистских материалов, хроник судебных процессов, воспоминаний, писем, газетной хроники и других источников в работе приведен анализ революции как явления, выросшего из самого мировосприятия российского общества и выражавшего его истинные побудительные мотивы.Кроме того, авторы книги дают свой ответ на несколько важнейших вопросов. В частности, когда поезд российской истории перешел на революционные рельсы? Правда ли, что в период между войнами Россия богатела и процветала? Почему единение царя с народом в августе 1914 года так быстро сменилось лютой ненавистью народа к монархии? Какую роль в революции сыграла водка? Могла ли страна в 1917 году продолжать войну? Какова была истинная роль большевиков и почему к власти в итоге пришли не депутаты, фактически свергнувшие царя, не военные, не олигархи, а именно революционеры (что в действительности случается очень редко)? Существовала ли реальная альтернатива революции в сознании общества? И когда, собственно, в России началась Гражданская война?

Дмитрий Владимирович Зубов , Дмитрий Михайлович Дегтев , Дмитрий Михайлович Дёгтев

Документальная литература / История / Образование и наука
100 великих казней
100 великих казней

В широком смысле казнь является высшей мерой наказания. Казни могли быть как относительно легкими, когда жертва умирала мгновенно, так и мучительными, рассчитанными на долгие страдания. Во все века казни были самым надежным средством подавления и террора. Правда, известны примеры, когда пришедшие к власти милосердные правители на протяжении долгих лет не казнили преступников.Часто казни превращались в своего рода зрелища, собиравшие толпы зрителей. На этих кровавых спектаклях важна была буквально каждая деталь: происхождение преступника, его былые заслуги, тяжесть вины и т.д.О самых знаменитых казнях в истории человечества рассказывает очередная книга серии.

Елена Н Авадяева , Елена Николаевна Авадяева , Леонид Иванович Зданович , Леонид И Зданович

История / Энциклопедии / Образование и наука / Словари и Энциклопедии