Читаем Fascist Pigs: Technoscientific Organisms and the History of Fascism полностью

In addition to collecting and experimenting with local wheats, the CSAZOI was also responsible for introducing in the colony the high-yield varieties developed by Italian breeders for the Battle of Wheat. The aim was to test these varieties under Ethiopian conditions and to hybridize them with local landraces. The elite seeds were shipped from Italy to Ethiopia through the Colonial Agricultural Institute in Florence led by Maugini. Though Maugini is well known in Italian colonial historiography as an ideologue of Italian imperialism, here I want to emphasize the role of his Florence institute as a center of circulation of seeds between Europe and the Italian African colonies. In 1938 and 1939 the institute shipped about 1,000 varieties of so-called elite seeds from European institutions into Ethiopia, 300 of them cereal ones (wheat, corn, rice, rye, etc.), to be tested by the CSAZAI and its different dependencies in the colony. In the opposite direction, the institute collected from several expeditions through the Ethiopian territory several thousands of samples from local fields to be stored in Florence.

These expeditions constituted the basis of the survey work on the classification of Ethiopian wheats, which led to the important confirmation of the Ethiopian plateau as a Vavilov center of origin for hard wheat together with southwest Asia.[18] According to Nikolai Vavilov’s important theory, the area of the greatest variety of a domesticated plant is also its region of origin, where its wild strains should still exist. Such centers were thus crucial for breeders looking to introduce interesting traits into their crossings.[19] Their importance was asserted by the expedition craze of the interwar period, during which Nazis, Soviets, and North Americans went to the various centers identified by Vavilov in order to control the global genetic resources needed to improve food self-sufficiency through new plant breeds. While Vavilov’s institution in Saint Petersburg would become the first global seed bank, contributing to support Stalin’s projects for industrializing Soviet agriculture, Maugini had similar aspirations for his Florence institute in relation to the Italian colonies: collect diversity in Italian possessions and distribute elite seeds developed by European breeders among white settlers and African peasants.

Hard wheat was not the only interesting crop to have its center of origin in Ethiopia. Coffea arabica also migrated originally from the Ethiopian plateau to the mountains of Yemen and from there into all the other important coffee production areas of the world. Indeed, Italian agronomists were quick to identify coffee as one of the few safe sources of revenues of the new colony.[20] Already before the Italian invasion, 80 percent of the Ethiopian coffee production was being exported and constituted the only major agriculture export of the country.[21] If wheat proved essential to feed the colonial army and the builders of the colonial infrastructure, coffee was the main commodity that enabled Italians to dream of Ethiopia as an important source of revenue. In an alternative formulation, wheat was important so that coffee could be cultivated. Acknowledging the scarcity of data concerning the concrete situation of coffee production in Ethiopia, agriculture experts estimated the total of exports in 1936 to be able to cover a third of Italy’s consumption. In spite of their lack of detailed information, they insisted on the importance of understanding that aggregated production numbers referred to clearly differentiated local realities.

In the eastern regions, in the Harar and the Arussi, there were a few large coffee plantations—some as large as 1,500 hectares—owned by Europeans who bought the properties before Italian occupation and were based on intensive use of wage native labor. These large capitalist operations were surrounded by a multitude of small plots of independent indigenous coffee cultivators. In the valley of the Errer near the capital of the region—Harar, the center of Islamic culture and religion in the Horn of Africa—there were about 10,000 of these small coffee native growers.[22] The coffee type produced in this eastern part of the Ethiopian highlands was the Harari, with characteristically large grains, long shape, and slightly green color. The Harari was the result of the historical transplantation undertaken by Arabs of wild plants from the western parts of the territory, the center of origin of the Arabica, into the valley of the Errer. Italians, in their obsession with condemning the Negus rule, blamed the Abyssinian invasion of the area in 1887 for being responsible for the destruction of many of these Arab coffee plots and their replacement by barley, “thus substituting a rich and promising culture with a poorer one.”[23]

Перейти на страницу:

Все книги серии Inside Technology

Fascist Pigs: Technoscientific Organisms and the History of Fascism
Fascist Pigs: Technoscientific Organisms and the History of Fascism

In the fascist regimes of Mussolini's Italy, Salazar's Portugal, and Hitler's Germany, the first mass mobilizations involved wheat engineered to take advantage of chemical fertilizers, potatoes resistant to late blight, and pigs that thrived on national produce. Food independence was an early goal of fascism; indeed, as Tiago Saraiva writes in Fascist Pigs, fascists were obsessed with projects to feed the national body from the national soil. Saraiva shows how such technoscientific organisms as specially bred wheat and pigs became important elements in the institutionalization and expansion of fascist regimes. The pigs, the potatoes, and the wheat embodied fascism. In Nazi Germany, only plants and animals conforming to the new national standards would be allowed to reproduce. Pigs that didn't efficiently convert German-grown potatoes into pork and lard were eliminated.Saraiva describes national campaigns that intertwined the work of geneticists with new state bureaucracies; discusses fascist empires, considering forced labor on coffee, rubber, and cotton in Ethiopia, Mozambique, and Eastern Europe; and explores fascist genocides, following Karakul sheep from a laboratory in Germany to Eastern Europe, Libya, Ethiopia, and Angola.Saraiva's highly original account — the first systematic study of the relation between science and fascism — argues that the "back to the land" aspect of fascism should be understood as a modernist experiment involving geneticists and their organisms, mass propaganda, overgrown bureaucracy, and violent colonialism.Inside Technologyedited by Wiebe E. Bijker, W. Bernard Carlson, and Trevor J. PinchA list of the series appears at the back of the book.

Tiago Saraiva

История

Похожие книги

1917: русская голгофа. Агония империи и истоки революции
1917: русская голгофа. Агония империи и истоки революции

В представленной книге крушение Российской империи и ее последнего царя впервые показано не с точки зрения политиков, писателей, революционеров, дипломатов, генералов и других образованных людей, которых в стране было меньшинство, а через призму народного, обывательского восприятия. На основе многочисленных архивных документов, журналистских материалов, хроник судебных процессов, воспоминаний, писем, газетной хроники и других источников в работе приведен анализ революции как явления, выросшего из самого мировосприятия российского общества и выражавшего его истинные побудительные мотивы.Кроме того, авторы книги дают свой ответ на несколько важнейших вопросов. В частности, когда поезд российской истории перешел на революционные рельсы? Правда ли, что в период между войнами Россия богатела и процветала? Почему единение царя с народом в августе 1914 года так быстро сменилось лютой ненавистью народа к монархии? Какую роль в революции сыграла водка? Могла ли страна в 1917 году продолжать войну? Какова была истинная роль большевиков и почему к власти в итоге пришли не депутаты, фактически свергнувшие царя, не военные, не олигархи, а именно революционеры (что в действительности случается очень редко)? Существовала ли реальная альтернатива революции в сознании общества? И когда, собственно, в России началась Гражданская война?

Дмитрий Владимирович Зубов , Дмитрий Михайлович Дегтев , Дмитрий Михайлович Дёгтев

Документальная литература / История / Образование и наука
100 великих казней
100 великих казней

В широком смысле казнь является высшей мерой наказания. Казни могли быть как относительно легкими, когда жертва умирала мгновенно, так и мучительными, рассчитанными на долгие страдания. Во все века казни были самым надежным средством подавления и террора. Правда, известны примеры, когда пришедшие к власти милосердные правители на протяжении долгих лет не казнили преступников.Часто казни превращались в своего рода зрелища, собиравшие толпы зрителей. На этих кровавых спектаклях важна была буквально каждая деталь: происхождение преступника, его былые заслуги, тяжесть вины и т.д.О самых знаменитых казнях в истории человечества рассказывает очередная книга серии.

Елена Н Авадяева , Елена Николаевна Авадяева , Леонид Иванович Зданович , Леонид И Зданович

История / Энциклопедии / Образование и наука / Словари и Энциклопедии