are being escorted "only to Israel", have come deeply rooted every day practice, while the free countries, advocating "human rights", are accepting this as
something normal. .... I am really worried by all this. As well as by something else. Will our Canada stay free and democratic after such outraged violation of
the rights and human dignity of Russian Jewry, who were unfortunate enough to get entrapped?"
As an example to support our statements let's consider my immigration case: Accoding to the section 2(1) of the Immigration Act ( as enacted by R.S.C.
1985 (4th Supp.), c.28, s.1): "Convention refugee" means any person who (a) By reason of a well - founded fear of persecution for reasons of race, religion,
nationality, membership in a particular social group or political opinion, (i) is outside the country of the person's nationality and is unable or, by reason of the
fear, is unwilling to avail himself of the protection of that country... - Although the panel had not find any lies or contradictions in the testimonies of the three
of us; - Although I had been persecuted and threatened for my political opinion; - Although our statements had been supported by much material from Israeli
Press; - Although few eyewitnesses had testified on my behalf before the panel; - Although we have physical evidences of attacks on my son and me;
Although there had been a sexual assault of my wife; - Although the police had never protected us (me and my son) and my spouse from physical attacks and
sexual assault, but opposite, the police had beaten me several times; Although my son became an invalid (uncontrolable urine flow at night time) after he has
been physical assaulted by his peers because he is not a Jew and obviously not circumcised; - Although we did our best to get rooted in Israel for two years,
we had to leave this country after the final threat to pay with my wife's and son's lives if I don't stop my intentions to defend human and civil rights of the new
repatriants, the panel had determind us not to be convention refugees! If we are not suitable to this status, so who are? My case is not an exception between
the decisions of the Refugee Boards. The refusal to make positive decisions in definition of the status for refugees from Israel became a rule in Toronto even
when a person is found credible and persecuted (case of Mrs. Tamara Minakina I.D. No. 2316-6978, T94-07405). Our refugee process had been
extremely long and stressful. The hearing had continued over two years ( five full days), then we had to wait for the decision for 19 months ( total almost four
years), and for an another year I had waited for the Judicial Review. As a result, we must leave Canada, although we, especially my teenage son, have
become much more Canadian then even Russian or Israeli. During these years the situation in Israel had worsened for people like us: hardliners and the
ultraorthodox had come to power and had passed laws against christians. They constantly declare that Israel is a state created by Jews for Jews only. Many
prominent politicians and human rights activists like me (parliament and government members Shulamit Alony, Yosi Sarid and others) have received death
threats. Certainly my family and me would face a great risk to our lives there. We are ready to present numerous documents that prove that our situation in
Israel was unbearable and that we indeed qualify to receive refugee status according to the Refugee Convention. Such an attitude towards our cases by
Toronto's IRB leads us to a conclusion that there is a bias in this office against any refugee claimant from Israel and that their decisions are not objective. We
are ready to discuss this issue at any level in front of any auditorium in order to prove that IRB of Toronto has violated the promises, which Canada gave to
the United Nations (to give refuge to the persecuted or discriminated people). I am writing about the case of my family, but there are others who have also
encountered the same unjust inhumane and unreasonable threatment from the IRB. I know that Canada has high humanitarian values.
I'm attaching some documents I hope you will be interested to read ( letter from Mrs. Sarmite D. Bulte, Member of Parliament and letters from my lawyer Mr. Gerald W. Postelnik) Sincerely, Alexander Orlovsky family
Alexander Orlovsky - 41 I.D. No. 2839 - 1984 ; Tribunal's No. T93-12990 Rima Orlovsky - 43 I.D. No. 2839 - 1992 ; Tribunal's No. T93-12991
Alexey Orlovsky - 18 I.D. No. 2839 - 1993 ; Tribunal's No. T93-12992
Canadian Jewish Congress calls upcoming conference speaker an anti-Semite
TORONTO - A group that's organized a health conference in Toronto says it wants proof The Consumer Health Organization of Canada has invited US based author Eustace Mullins to speak at the Total Health conference later this month.
He will speak on "the Rockefeller medical monopoly."
The Canadian Jewish Congress says Mullins is a high-profile racist who has written anti-Semitic and anti-black tracts.