Here, therefore, and arising from this book, is one last idea for the scientists to build on. Given the Aristotelian successes of both the remote and the immediate past, is it not time to face
the possibility – even the probability – that the essential Platonic notion of the ‘inner self’ is misconceived? There
is no inner self. Looking ‘in’,
we have found nothing – nothing stable anyway, nothing enduring, nothing we can all agree upon, nothing conclusive – because there is nothing to find. We human beings are part
of nature and therefore we are more likely to find out about our ‘inner’ nature, to understand ourselves, by looking outside ourselves, at our role and place as animals. In John
Gray’s words, ‘A zoo is a better window from which to look out of the human world than a monastery.’27 This is not
paradoxical, and without some such realignment of approach, the modern incoherence will continue.
Notes and References
When two dates are given for a publication, the first refers to the hardback edition, the second to the paperback edition. Unless otherwise stated, pagination refers to the
paperback edition.
INTRODUCTION: THE MOST IMPORTANT IDEAS IN HISTORY – SOME CANDIDATES
1. Michael White, Isaac Newton: The Last Sorcerer
, London: Fourth Estate, 1997, page 3. Keynes also said: ‘I
fancy his [Newton’s] pre-eminence was due to his muscles of intuition being the strongest and most enduring with which a man has ever been gifted.’ Robert Skidelsky, John
Maynard Keynes, London: Macmillan, 2003, page 458.2. Norman Hampson, The Enlightenment
, London: Penguin, 1990, pages 34 and 36.3. James Gleick, Isaac Newton
, London: Fourth Estate HarperCollins, 2003/ 2004, pages 101–108; Frank E. Manuel,
A Portrait of Isaac Newton, Cambridge, Massachusetts: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, 1968, page 398n.4. Joseph Needham, The Great Titration
, London: Allen & Unwin, 1969, page 62.5. Charles Freeman, The Closing of the Western Mind
, London: William Heinemann, 2002, page 322.6. Ibid.
7. Ibid.,
page 327.8. Marcia Colish, Medieval Foundations of the Western Intellectual Tradition: 400–1400
, New Haven and London:
Yale University Press 1997, page 249.9. Harry Elmer Barnes, An Intellectual and Cultural History of the Western World
, volume two. From the Renaissance
Through the Eighteenth Century, New York: Dover, 1937, page 825.10. Francis Bacon, Novum Organum
, Book 1, aphorism 129, quoted in Joseph Needham et al., Science and
Civilisation in China, volume 1, Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press, 1954, page 19.11. Ibid.
12. Barnes, Op. cit
., page 831.13. John Bowle, A History of Europe
, London: Secker & Warburg/Heinemann, 1979, page 391.14. Hagen Schulze, States, Nations and Nationalism
, Oxford: Blackwell, 1994/1996, page 395.15. Ernest Gellner, Plough, Sword and Book
, London: Collins Harvill, 1988.16. Ibid.,
page 19f.17. Barnes, Op. cit
., pages 669ff.18. Adam Smith, An Inquiry Into The Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations
, edited by R. H. Campbell and A. S.
Skinner, two volumes, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1976, volume 1, page 265.19. Gellner, Op. cit
., page 19.20. Carlo Cipolla, Guns and Sails in the Early Phase of European Expansion, 1400–1700
, London: Collins, 1965,
pages 5 and 148–149.21. Richard Tarnas, The Passion of the Western Mind
, London: Pimlico, 1991, pages 298ff.22. Johan Goudsblom, Fire and Civilisation
, London: Allen Lane The Penguin Press, 1992, pages 164ff.23. Isaiah Berlin, The Sense of Reality: Studies in Ideas and Their History
, edited by Henry
Hardy, London: Chatto & Windus, 1996, pages 168–169.24. Jared Diamond, Guns, Germs and Steel
, London: Jonathan Cape, 1997, pages 200–202.25. Jacob Bronowski and Bruce Mazlish, The Western Intellectual Tradition
, New York: Harper & Brothers, 1960,
page 495.26. Barnes, Op. cit
., page 720.27. Bronowski and Mazlish, Op. cit
., page 259.28. Arthur O. Lovejoy, The Great Chain of Being
, Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press, 1936/1964, page
23.