called the 'Diagram of Everything Living.'
"According to this diagram every kind of creature, every degree of being, is defined
creatures."
G. drew a diagram in the form of a ladder with eleven squares. And in each square
excepting the two higher he put three circles with numbers. (See Fig. 58.)
"Each square denotes a level of being," he said. "The 'hydrogen' in the lower circle shows what the given class of creatures feeds on. The 'hydrogen' in the upper circle
shows the class which feeds on these features. And the 'hydrogen' in the middle circle
is the average 'hydrogen' of this class showing what these creatures are.
"The place of man is the seventh square from the bottom or the fifth square from the top. According to this diagram man is 'hydrogen' 24, he feeds on 'hydrogen' 96, and is
himself food for 'hydrogen' 6. The square next below man will be 'vertebrates'; the
next 'invertebrates.' Invertebrates are 'hydrogen' 96. Consequently man feeds on
'invertebrates.'
"Do not for the moment look for contradictions but try to understand what this may
mean. And equally do not compare this diagram with others. According to the diagram
of food man feeds on 'hydrogen' 768;
according to this diagram on 'hydrogen' 96. Why? What does it mean? Both the one is
right and the other is right. Later, when you grasp this you will piece everything
together into one.
'The square next below is — plants. The next — minerals, the next - metals, which
constitute a separate cosmic group among minerals; and the following square has no
name in our language because we never meet
with matter in this state on the earth's surface. This square comes into contact with the Absolute. You remember we spoke before about 'Holy the Firm.' This is 'Holy the
Firm.'"
At the bottom of the last square he placed a small triangle with its apex below.
"Now, on the other side of man is square 3, 12, 48. This is a class of creatures which we do not know. Let us call them 'angels.' The next square—1, 6, 24; let us call these
beings 'archangels.'"
In the following square he put figures 3 and 12 and two circles, each with a point at
their centers, and called it the "Eternal Unchanging," and in the next square he put the figures 1 and 6; he put a circle in the middle and in this circle a triangle containing
another circle with a point at its center and called it the "Absolute."
"This diagram will not be very comprehensible to you at first," he said. "But gradually you will learn to make it out. Only for a long time you will have to take it
separately from all the rest."
This was in fact all I heard from G. about this strange diagram which actually
appeared to upset a great deal of what had been said before.
In our conversations about this diagram we very soon agreed to take "angels" as planets and "archangels" as suns. Many other things gradually became clear to us. But what used to confuse us a great deal was the appearance of "hydrogen" 6144 which was absent altogether in the previous scale of "hydrogens" in the third scale which ended with "hydrogen" 3072. At the same time, G. insisted that the enumeration of
"hydrogens" had been taken according to the third scale.
A long time afterwards I asked him what this meant.
"It is an incomplete 'hydrogen,'" he said. "A 'hydrogen' without the Holy Ghost. It belongs to the same, that is to the third, scale, but it is unfinished.
"Each complete 'hydrogen' is composed of 'carbon,' 'oxygen,' and 'nitrogen.' Now
take the last 'hydrogen' of the third scale, 'hydrogen' 3072. This 'hydrogen' is
composed of 'carbon' 512, 'oxygen' 1536, and 'nitrogen' 1024.
"Now further: 'Nitrogen' becomes 'carbon' for the next triad, but there is no 'oxygen'
for it and no 'nitrogen.' Therefore by condensation it becomes itself 'hydrogen' 6144,
but it is a
'hydrogen' without the Holy Ghost."
This was G.'s last visit to Petersburg. I tried to speak to him about impending
events. But he said nothing definite on which I could base my own actions.
A very interesting event took place in connection with his departure. This happened
at the railway station. We were all seeing him off at the Nikolaievsky Station. G. was
standing talking to us on the platform by the carriage. He was the usual G. we had
always known. After the second bell he went into the carriage—his compartment was
next to the door— and came to the window.
He was different! In the window we saw another man, not the one who had gone