Читаем Kaddish for an Unborn Child полностью

“No!” something had bellowed and howled inside me, instantly and at once, when my wife (though as it happens long since not my wife) first made mention of it — of you— and my whimpering abated only gradually, yes, actually only after the passage of many long years, into a gloomy weltschmerz, like Wotan’s raging fury during the renowned farewell scene, until a question assumed ever more definite form within me, emerging as it were from the mist-shrouded figurations of stifled string voices, slowly and malignantly, like an insidious illness, and you are that question; or to be more precise, I am, but an I rendered questionable by you; or to be even more precise (and Dr. Obláth, too, broadly agrees with this): my existence viewed as the potentiality of your being, or in other words, me as a murderer, if one wishes to take precision to the extreme, to the point of absurdity, and albeit at the cost of a certain amount of self-torment, since, thank God, it’s too late now, now it’ll always be too late; that is permissible too, you are not, whereas I can be assured of being in complete safety, having ruined everything, smashed everything to bits, with that “no,” above all my ill-starred, short-lived marriage, I tell (told) Dr. Obláth, doctor of philosophy, with a dispassion that life may never have been able to inculcate in me but which I have nevertheless by now become quite practiced at practicing should it be absolutely necessary. And it was necessary on this occasion because the philosopher was approaching me in contemplative mood, as I immediately discerned from the slight sideways tilt of his head, on which was flatly perched his rakish peaked-cap, as if he were an oncoming comic highwayman who had already knocked back a few glasses and was now deliberating whether to rap me on the head or make do with some ransom money. But of course (and I was about to say: sadly) Obláth was not deliberating that at all; philosophers do not commonly deliberate about highwaymanship, or if they do happen to, then it manifests itself to them in the form of a weighty philosophical question, and they leave the dirty work to the professionals, for, after all, one has seen that sort of thing before, though it was sheer whimsy and all but an aspersion for me to allow such an association with Dr. Obláth, of all people, to cross my mind, for I know nothing about his past, nor will he recount it, it is to be hoped. No, but he did surprise me with a no less indiscreet question, rather as if a highwayman were to inquire how much money I have in my pocket, for he began to pry into my family circumstances, though, to be fair, only after having first led up to that by informing me about his own, as a down payment, so to say, on the premise, so to say, that if I were allowed to find out everything about him, despite my being not in the slightest bit interested, he would thereby earn the right to my… but I shall break off this exegesis as I sense that the letters and words are carrying me away, and carrying me away in the wrong direction at that, in the direction of a moralizing paranoia, a state in which, sadly, I catch myself all too often these days and the reasons for which are all too obvious to me (loneliness, isolation, voluntary exile), not that those reasons worry me since they are of my own making, after all — so to say, the first few scoops of the spade towards the much, much deeper trench that I still have to dig out, clod by clod, from one end to the other, for there to be something to swallow me up (though maybe I am not digging in the ground but rather in the air because there one is unconfined) — since all Dr. Obláth did was ask an innocent question as to whether I had a child; though certainly, with a philosopher’s rude candor, which is to say tactlessly and in any case at the worst possible moment, but then, how was he to have known that his question would, undeniably, somewhat upset me. Or that I would then reply to the question with an overwhelming compulsion to speak that sprang from my exaggerated sense of politeness, a politeness exaggerated to the point of self-denial, repellent to me from first to last even as I was speaking, despite which I nevertheless recounted that:

Перейти на страницу:

Похожие книги

Оптимистка (ЛП)
Оптимистка (ЛП)

Секреты. Они есть у каждого. Большие и маленькие. Иногда раскрытие секретов исцеляет, А иногда губит. Жизнь Кейт Седжвик никак нельзя назвать обычной. Она пережила тяжелые испытания и трагедию, но не смотря на это сохранила веселость и жизнерадостность. (Вот почему лучший друг Гас называет ее Оптимисткой). Кейт - волевая, забавная, умная и музыкально одаренная девушка. Она никогда не верила в любовь. Поэтому, когда Кейт покидает Сан Диего для учебы в колледже, в маленьком городке Грант в Миннесоте, меньше всего она ожидает влюбиться в Келлера Бэнкса. Их тянет друг к другу. Но у обоих есть причины сопротивляться этому. У обоих есть секреты. Иногда раскрытие секретов исцеляет, А иногда губит.

Ким Холден , КНИГОЗАВИСИМЫЕ Группа , Холден Ким

Современные любовные романы / Проза / Современная русская и зарубежная проза / Современная проза / Романы