Момент истины. Почему мы ошибаемся, когда все поставлено на карту, и что с этим делать?

44. Gopher D., Weil M., Bareket T. Transfer of skill from a computer game trainer to flight // Human Factors, 1994Vol. 36. Pp. 1–19. См. также: Sharp Brains, интервью с Дэниелом Гофером, 2 ноября 2006 г. // http://www.sharpbrains.com/blog/2006/11/02/cognitive-simulations-for-basketball-game-intelligence-interview-with-prof-daniel-gopher/.

45. White H. A., Shah P. Uninhibited imaginations: Creativity in adults with Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder // Personality and Individual Differences, 2006. Vol. 40. Pp. 1121–1131.

Глава 4

46. Summers L. H. Remarks at NBER Conference on Diversifying the Science & Engineering Workforce, Cambridge, Mass., January, 14, 2005.

47. Benbow C. P., Stanley J. C. Sex differences in mathematical reasoning ability: More facts // Science, 1983. Vol. 222. Pp. 1029–1030.

48. Ackerman P. L. Cognitive sex differences and mathematics and science achievement // American Psychologist, 2006. Vol. 61. Pp. 722–723.

49. Дополнительно см.: Shields S. A. Functionalism, Darwinism, and the psychology of women: A study in social myth // American Psychologist, 1975. Pp. 739–754.

50. Summers’ remarks on women draw fire // Boston Globe, 2005. January 17.

51. Herrnstain R., Murray C. The Bell Curve: Intelligence and Class Structure in American Life. New York: Free Press, 1994.

52. Benbow C. P., Stanley J. C. Sex differences in mathematical reasoning ability: More facts // Science, 1983. Vol. 222. Pp. 1029–1030. См. также: Benbow C. P., Stanley J. C. Sex differences in mathematical ability: Fact or artifact? // Science, 1980. Vol. 210. Pp. 1262–1264.

53. Ellison G., Swanson A. The gender gap in secondary school mathematics at high achievement levels: Evidence from the American Mathematics Competitions, NBER Working Paper No. 15238, August 2009.

54. Rivera S. M., Reiss A. L., Eckert M. A., Menon V. Developmental changes in mental arithmetic: Evidence for increased specialization in the left inferior parietal cortex // Cerebral Cortex, 2005. Vol. 15. Pp. 1779–1790.

55. Дополнительно см.: Halpern D. F. et al. The science of sex differences in science and mathematics // Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 2007. Vol. 8. Pp. 1–51.

56. Resnick S. M., Berenbaum S. A., Gottesman I. I., Bouchard T. J. Early hormonal influences on cognitive functioning in congenital adrenal hyperplasia // Developmental Psychology, 1986. Vol. 22. Pp. 191–198. См. также: Maloufa M. A. et al. Cognitive outcome in adult women affected by congenital adrenal hyperplasia due to 21-hydroxylase deficiency // Hormone Research in Pediatrics, 2006. Vol. 65. Pp. 142–150.

57. Monastersky R. Studies show biological differences in how boys and girls learn about math, but social factors play a big role too // Chronicle of Higher Education, 2005. March 4. Vol. 51.

58. Дополнительно см.: Spelke E. S. Sex differences in intrinsic aptitude for mathematics and science? A critical review // American Psychologist, 2005. Vol. 60. Pp. 950–958.

59. Gallagher A., DeLisi R. Gender differences in Scholastic Aptitude Test — Mathematics problem solving among high-ability students // Journal of Educational Psychology, 1994. Vol. 86. Pp. 204–211.

60. Fennema E., Carpenter T., Jacobs V. et al. A longitudinal study of gender differences in young children’s mathematical thinking // Educational Researcher, 1996. Vol. 27. Pp. 33–43.

61. Butler L. Gender differences in children’s arithmetical problem solving procedures. Unpublished M.A. thesis, University of California at Los Angeles, 1999 // Association for Women in Mathematics president Cathy Kessel’s talk at the MER-AWM Session at the 2005 Joint Mathematics Meetings.

62. Atkinson R. C. Let’s step back from the SAT I // San Jose Mercury News, 2001. February 23 // http://www.ucop.edu/pres/comments/satmerc.html.

63. Spencer S. J., Steele C. M., Quinn D. M. Stereotype threat and women’s math performance // Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 1999. Vol. 35. Pp. 4–28.

64. Дополнительно см.: Steele C. M. A threat in the air: How stereotypes shape intellectual identity and performance // American Psychologist, 1997. Vol. 52. Pp. 613–629; Schmader T., Johns M., Forbes C. An integrated process model of stereotype threat effects on performance // Psychological Review, 2008. Vol. 115. Pp. 336–356.

65. Krendl A. C., Richeson J. A., Kelley W. M., Heatherton T. F. The negative consequences of threat: A functional magnetic resonance imaging investigation of the neural mechanisms underlying women’s underperformance in math // Psychological Science, 2008. Vol. 19. Pp. 168–175. См. также: Beilock S. L. Math performance in stressful situations // Current Directions in Psychological Science, 2008. Vol. 17. Pp. 339–343.

66. Levine S. C. et al. Socioeconomic status modifies the sex difference in spatial skill // Psychological Science, 2005. Vol. 16. Pp. 841–845.

67. Thurstone T. G. PMA readiness level. Chicago: Science Research Associates, 1974. Приведено с разрешения.