Научная эффективность в работе

38. Elliott D. B. Salami slicing and the SPU: Publish or Perish? // Ophthalmic and Physiological Optics. 2013. N 33(6). 312 p.

39. Galison P. Trading with the enemy // Trading zones and interactional expertise: creating new kinds of collaboration / ed. by M. E. Gorman. Cambridge: MIT Press, 2010. P. 25–52.

40. Garfield E. Has Scientific Communication Changed in 300 Years? // Current Contents. N 8. February 25, 1980. P. 5–11.

41. Garfield E. From the Science of Science to Scientometrics Visualizing the History of Science with HistCite Software // Journal of Informetrics. 2009. N 3. P. 173–179.

42. Harding S. “Strong objectivity”: a Response to the New Objectivity Question // Synthese. 1995. N 104. P. 331–349.

43. Harrison C. E., Johnson A. Introduction: Science and National Identity // Osiris. 2009. Vol. 24, N 1. P. 1–14.

44. Hicks D. One size doesn’t fit all: On the co-evolution of national evaluation systems and social science publishing. // Confero. Vol. 1, N 1. 2013. P. 67–90.

45. Hicks, D. Wouters P., Waltman L., Rijcke S., Rafols I. Bibliometrics: The Leiden Manifesto for Research Metrics // Nature. 2015. Vol. 520, N 7548. P. 429–431.

46. Khvatova T., Dushina S. To Manage or Govern? Researching the Legitimacy of NPM-based Institutional Reforms in Russian Universities // Journal of Management Development. 2017. Vol. 36. N 2. P. 250–267.

47. Kronick D. A. “Devant Le Deluge” and Other Essays on Early Modern Scientific Communication. Latham, MD; Oxford, UK: Scarecrow Press, 2004.

48. Marcus G. E., Fischer M. Anthropology as cultural critique: An experimental moment in the human sciences. Chicago; London: University of Chicago Press. 1999. 194 p.

49. Mingers J. Leydesdorff L. A Review of Theory and Practice in Scientometrics // European Journal of Operational Research. 2015. Vol. 246, N 1. P. 1–19.

50. Mocnik R. Ricardo – Marx // Foucault – Altusser // (Mis)readings of Marx in Continental Philosophy / eds. J. Habjan, J. Whyte. Springer, 2014. P. 67–82.

51. Non-Representational Methodologies. Re-envisioning Research / ed. by Ph. Vannini, Ph. New York; London: Routledge, 2015. 204 p.

52. Price D. J. de S. Networks of Scientific Papers: The Pattern of Bibliographic References Indicates the Nature of the Scientific Research Front // Science. Vol. 149, iss. 3683. July 30, 1965. P. 510–515.

53. Priem J., Taraborelli P., Groth P., Neylon C. Altmetrics: A manifesto. 2010. URL:(дата обращения: 20.06. 2017).

54. Representation in Scientific Practice Revisited / eds C. Coopmans, J. Vertesi, M. Lynch, S. Woolgar. Mass.: MIT Press, 2014. 384 p.

55. Research Excellence Framework. URL:(дата обращения: 20.12.2017).

56. Rorty R. Objectivity, Relativism and Truth. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1991. 226 p.

57. Snowball Metrics Recipe Book / L. Colledge. URL:snowballmetrics.com/wp-content/uploads/snowball-recipe-book_ HR.pdf (дата обращения: 20.12.2017).

58. Trift N. Non-Representational Theory. London; New York: Rutledge, 2008. 336 p.

59. Watermeyer R., Olssen M. ‘Excellence’ and Exclusion: The Individual Costs of Institutional Competitiveness // Minerva. 2016. Vol. 54, iss. 2. P. 201–218.

Шиповалова Лада Владимировна