Читаем Open: An Autobiography полностью

I skip the Australian Open again at the start of 1992. I’ve never played it, and now doesn’t seem like the time to start. Still, I play Davis Cup and do fairly well, maybe because it’s in Hawaii. We face Argentina. I win both my matches. Then, the night before the last day, Wendi and I go out drinking with McEnroe and his wife, Tatum O’Neal. We overdo it, and I go to bed at four in the morning, assuming someone will take my place on Sunday, in a meaningless match, often called a dead rubber.

Apparently that’s not the case. Though I’m hungover and dehydrated, I need to go out and play Jaite, whose serve I once caught with my hand. Happily, Jaite’s hungover too. It’s fitting that this is a dead rubber; we both look dead and rubbery. To conceal my bloodshot eyes I play wearing Oakley sunglasses, and somehow I play well. I play relaxed. I walk off the court a winner, wondering if there’s a lesson in this. Can I tap this sort of relaxation when the stakes are real, when it’s a slam? Should I just go into every match hungover?

The next week I find myself on the cover of Tennis magazine, hitting a winner in my Oakley glasses. Hours after the magazine hits the newsstands, Wendi and I are at the bachelor pad when a delivery truck pulls up to the door. We go outside. Sign here, the deliveryman says.

What is this?

Gift. From Jim Jannard, founder of Oakley.

The back of the truck comes down, and a red Dodge Viper slowly descends.

Nice to know that, even if I’ve lost my game, I can still move product.

MY RANKING PLUMMETS. I fall out of the top ten. The only time I feel fairly competent on the court is when I play Davis Cup. In Fort Meyers I help the U.S. beat Czechoslovakia, winning both matches. Otherwise, the only game at which I show any improvement is Asteroids.

At the 1992 French Open I beat Pete, which feels good. Then I run into Courier again, this time in the semis. The memories of last year are still fresh, still painful, and I lose again - in straight sets. Once again Courier laces up his running shoes and goes for a jog afterward. I still can’t burn enough calories for him.

I limp to Florida and crash at Nick’s house. I don’t pick up a racket the whole time I’m there. Then, reluctantly, I have one short practice on a hard court at the Bollettieri Academy, and we all fly to Wimbledon.

The talent assembled in London in 1992 is stunning. There’s Courier, ranked number one, fresh off two slam victories. There’s Pete, who keeps getting better. There’s Stefan Edberg, who’s playing out of his mind. I’m the twelfth seed, and the way I’ve been playing I should be seeded lower.

In my first-round match, against Andrei Chesnokov, from Russia, I play like a low seed. I lose the first set. Frustrated, I rip into myself, curse myself, and the umpire gives me an official warning for saying fuck. I almost turn to him and fire a few fuck-fuck-fucks. Instead I decide to shock him, shock everyone, by taking a breath and being composed. Then I do something more shocking. I win the next three sets.

I’m in the quarters. Against Becker, who’s reached six of the last seven Wimbledon finals.

This is his de facto home court, his honey hole. But I’ve been seeing his serve well lately. I win in five sets, played over two days. Memories of Munich, put to rest.

In the semis I face McEnroe, three-time Wimbledon champion. He’s thirty-three, nearing the end of his career, and unseeded. Given his underdog status, and his legendary accomplishments, the fans want him to win, of course. Part of me wants him to win also. But I beat him in three sets. I’m in the final.

I’m expecting to face Pete, but he loses his semifinal match to Goran Ivanisevic, a big, strong serving machine from Croatia. I’ve played Ivanisevic twice before, and both times he’s shellacked me in straight sets. So I feel for Pete, and I know I’ll be joining him soon. I have no chance against Ivanisevic. It’s a middleweight versus a heavyweight. The only suspense is whether it will be a knockout or a TKO.

AS POWERFUL AS Ivanisevic’s serve is under normal circumstances, today it’s a work of art. He’s acing me left and right, monster serves that the speed gun clocks at 138 miles an hour. But it’s not just the speed, it’s the trajectory. They land at a 75-degree angle. I try not to care. I tell myself that aces happen. Each time he serves a ball past me, I say under my breath that he can’t do that every time. Just walk to the other side and get ready, Andre. The match will be decided on those few second serves.

He wins the first set, 7:6. I don’t break him once. I concentrate on not overreacting, on breathing in, breathing out, remaining patient. When the thought crosses my mind that I’m on the verge of losing my fourth slam final, I casually set that thought aside. In the second set Ivanisevic gives me a few freebies, makes a few mistakes, and I break him. I take the second set. Then the third. Which makes me feel almost worse, because once again I’m a set away from a slam.

Перейти на страницу:

Похожие книги

Образы Италии
Образы Италии

Павел Павлович Муратов (1881 – 1950) – писатель, историк, хранитель отдела изящных искусств и классических древностей Румянцевского музея, тонкий знаток европейской культуры. Над книгой «Образы Италии» писатель работал много лет, вплоть до 1924 года, когда в Берлине была опубликована окончательная редакция. С тех пор все новые поколения читателей открывают для себя муратовскую Италию: "не театр трагический или сентиментальный, не книга воспоминаний, не источник экзотических ощущений, но родной дом нашей души". Изобразительный ряд в настоящем издании составляют произведения петербургского художника Нади Кузнецовой, работающей на стыке двух техник – фотографии и графики. В нее работах замечательно переданы тот особый свет, «итальянская пыль», которой по сей день напоен воздух страны, которая была для Павла Муратова духовной родиной.

Павел Павлович Муратов

Биографии и Мемуары / Искусство и Дизайн / История / Историческая проза / Прочее
100 знаменитых тиранов
100 знаменитых тиранов

Слово «тиран» возникло на заре истории и, как считают ученые, имеет лидийское или фригийское происхождение. В переводе оно означает «повелитель». По прошествии веков это понятие приобрело очень широкое звучание и в наши дни чаще всего используется в переносном значении и подразумевает правление, основанное на деспотизме, а тиранами именуют правителей, власть которых основана на произволе и насилии, а также жестоких, властных людей, мучителей.Среди героев этой книги много государственных и политических деятелей. О них рассказывается в разделах «Тираны-реформаторы» и «Тираны «просвещенные» и «великодушные»». Учитывая, что многие служители религии оказывали огромное влияние на мировую политику и политику отдельных государств, им посвящен самостоятельный раздел «Узурпаторы Божественного замысла». И, наконец, раздел «Провинциальные тираны» повествует об исторических личностях, масштабы деятельности которых были ограничены небольшими территориями, но которые погубили множество людей в силу неограниченности своей тиранической власти.

Валентина Валентиновна Мирошникова , Илья Яковлевич Вагман , Наталья Владимировна Вукина

Биографии и Мемуары / Документальное