tion. The latter is more a direct threat to the lower echelons of
the pathocratic elite than to the leaders.
99 This should be kept firmly in mind by those who think that getting rid of
George W. Bush and the Neocons will change anything. [Editor’s note.]
208
PATHOCRACY
We can thus formulate a more cautious question: can such a
system ever waive territorial and political expansion abroad
and settle for its present possessions? What would happen if
such a state of affairs ensured internal peace, corresponding
order, and relative prosperity within the nation? The over-
whelming majority of the country’s population would then
make skillful use of all the emerging possibilities, taking ad-
vantage of their superior qualifications in order to fight for an
ever-increasing scope of activities; thanks to their higher birth
rate, their power will increase. This majority will be joined by
some sons from the privileged class who did not inherit the
pathological genes. The pathocracy’s dominance will weaken
imperceptibly but steadily, finally leading to a situation
wherein the society of normal people reaches for power. This is
a nightmare vision to the psychopaths.
end, starting with concentration camps and including warfare
with an obstinate, well-armed foe who will devastate and de-
bilitate the human power thrown at him, namely the very power
jeopardizing pathocrats rule: the sons of normal man sent out to
fight for an illusionary “noble cause.” Once safely dead, the
soldiers will then be decreed heroes to be revered in paeans,
useful for raising a new generation faithful to the pathocracy
and ever willing to go to their deaths to protect it.
Any war waged by a pathocratic nation has two fronts, the
internal and the external. The internal front is more important
for the leaders and the governing elite, and the internal threat is
the deciding factor where unleashing war is concerned. In pon-
dering whether to start a war against the pathocratic country,
other nations must therefore give primary consideration to the
fact that such a war can be used as an executioner of the com-
mon people whose increasing power represents incipient jeop-
ardy for the pathocracy. After all, pathocrats give short shrift to
blood and suffering of people they consider to be not quite
conspecific. Kings may have suffered due to the death of their
knights, but pathocrats never do: “We have a lot of people
here.” Should the situation be, or become, ripe in such a coun-
POLITICAL PONEROLOGY
209
try, however, anyone furnishing assistance to the nation will be
blessed by it; anyone withholding it will be cursed.
Pathocracy has other internal reasons for pursuing expan-
sionism through the use of all means possible. As long as that
“other” world governed by the systems of normal man exists, it
inducts into the non-pathological majority a certain sense of
direction. The non-pathological majority of the country’s popu-
lation will never stop dreaming of the reinstatement of the
normal man’s system in any possible form. This majority will
never stop watching other countries, waiting for the opportune
moment; its attention and power must therefore be distracted
from this purpose, and the masses must be “educated” and
channeled in the direction of imperialist strivings. This goal
must be pursued doggedly so that everyone knows what is be-
ing fought for and in whose name harsh discipline and poverty
must be endured. The latter factor – creating conditions of pov-
erty and hardship - effectively limits the possibility of “subver-
sive” activities on the part of the society of normal people.
The ideology must, of course, furnish a corresponding justi-
fication for this alleged right to conquer the world and must
therefore be properly elaborated. Expansionism is derived from
the very nature of pathocracy, not from ideology, but this fact
must be masked by ideology.100 Whenever this phenomenon