of forgiving the pathocrats themselves; it is extremely danger-
ous and thus “immoral”.
We thus have the right to invent appropriate names which
would indicate the nature of the phenomena as accurately as
96 “Extraordinary rendition” as the nomenclature for illegally transporting
prisoners to countries where torture is practiced comes immediately to mind
as an example. [Editor’s note.]
97 Example: “You are with us, or you are against us.” And being “against us”
means that “you are a terrorist” and thus, immoral. [Editor’s note.]
206
PATHOCRACY
possible, in keeping with our recognition and respect for the
laws of the scientific methodology and semantics. Such accu-
rate terms will also serve to protect our minds from the sugges-
tive effects of those other names and paralogisms, including the
pathological material the latter contain.
The Expansion of the Pathocracy
The world’s tendency to fasten its gaze adoringly upon its
rulers has a long tradition dating back to the times when sover-
eigns could virtually ignore their subjects’ opinions. However,
rulers have always been dependent upon the social and eco-
nomic situation in their country, even long ago, and even in
pathocratic systems, and the influence of various social groups
has reached their thrones by various means.
Much too common is the pattern of error which reasons that
purportedly autocratic leaders of countries affected by this
pathocracy actually possess decision-making powers in areas
which they in fact do not. Millions of people, including minis-
ters and members of parliaments, ponder the dilemma of
whether such a ruler could not, under certain circumstances,
modify his convictions somewhat and relinquish his dreams of
conquering the world; they continue hope that this will be the
eventual outcome.98 People with personal experience in such a
system may attempt to persuade them that their dreams, al-
though decent, lack a foundation in reality, but at the same time
they sense a lack of concrete arguments on their part. Such an
explanation is in fact impossible within the realm of the natural
language of psychological concepts; only an objective compre-
hension of the historical phenomenon and its essentially devi-
ant nature permits light to be shed upon the causes of the
non.
98 This is especially true in the present day when the leaders and parliaments
of many other countries, unhappy with the Bush Neocon administration,
think that diplomacy or new elections in the U.S. will “set things right”. They
do not understand the full nature of Pathocracy and that the psychopaths in
the shadows of this phenomenon will never relinquish control without blood-
shed. [Editor’s note.]
POLITICAL PONEROLOGY
207
The actions of this phenomenon affect an entire society,
starting with the leaders and infiltrating every village, small
town, factory, business, or farm. The pathological social struc-
ture gradually covers the entire country, creating a “new class”
within that nation. This privileged class of deviants feels per-
manently threatened by the “others”, i.e. by the majority of
normal people.
A normal person deprived of privilege or high position will
go about finding and performing some work which will earn
him a living; but pathocrats never possessed any solid practical
talent, and the time frame of their rule eliminates any residual
possibilities of adapting to the demands of normal work. If the
laws of normal man were to be reinstated, they and theirs could
be subjected to judgment, including a moralizing interpretation
of their psychological deviations; they would be threatened by
a loss of freedom and life, not merely a loss of position and
privilege. Since they are incapable of this kind of sacrifice, the
survival of a system which is the best for them
any and all psychological and political cunning implemented
with a lack of scruples with regard to those other “inferior-
quality” people that can be shocking in its depravity.99
In general, this new class is in the position to purge its lead-
ers should their behavior jeopardize the existence of such a
system. This could occur particularly if the leadership wished
to go too far in compromising with the society of normal peo-
ple, since their qualifications make them essential for produc-