more easily situate ourselves in a small town, where it is much
easier to peek backstage and analyze the nature of such a sys-
tem.
However, some of the differences in the nature of the
pathocratic phenomenon between the originating country and
the country on which it is forcibly imposed turn out to be per-
manent. The system will always strike the society that has been
taken over as something foreign associated with the other coun-
try. The society’s historical tradition and culture constitute a
connection to those strivings aimed in the direction of normal
man’s structures. The more mature cultural formations in par-
ticular prove the most highly resistant to the system’s destruc-
tive activities. The subjugated nation finds support and inspira-
tion for its psychological and moral resistance in its own cul-
tural, religious, and moral traditions. These values, elaborated
216
PATHOCRACY
through centuries, cannot easily be destroyed or co-opted by
pathocracy; quite the contrary, they even embark upon a more
intensive life in the new society. These values progressively
cleanse themselves of patriotic buffoonery, and their principal
contents become more real in their eternal meaning. If forced
by necessity, the culture of the country in question is concealed
in private homes or disseminated via conspiracy; however, it
continues to survive and develop, creating values which could
not have arisen during happier times.
As a result, such a society’s opposition becomes ever more
enduring, ever more skillfully effected. It turns out that those
who believed they could impose such a system, trusting that it
would then function on the pathocracy’s autonomic mecha-
nisms, were overly optimistic. Imposed pathocracy always
remains an alien system to the extent that, if it should fall in the
country of its birth, its endurance within the subjugated nation
would only be a matter of weeks.
Artifically Infected Pathocracy
and Psychological Warfare
If a nucleus of this macrosocial pathological phenomenon
already exists in the world, always cloaking its true quality
behind an ideological mask of some political system, it irradi-
ates into other nations via coded news difficult for normal peo-
ple to understand, but easy to read for psychopathic individu-
als. “That’s the place for us, we now have a homeland where
our dreams about ruling those “others” can come true. We can
finally live in safety and prosperity.” The more powerful this
nucleus and the pathocratic nation, the wider the scope of its
inductive siren-call, heard by individuals whose nature is corre-
spondingly deviant, as though they were superheterodyne re-
ceivers naturally attuned to the same wave-length. Unfortu-
nately, what is being used today is real radio transmitters in the
hundreds of kilowatts, as well as loyal covert agents of pathoc-
racy networking our planet.
Whether directly or indirectly, i.e. by means of deviant
“agents”, this call of pathocracy, once appropriately “decked-
out”, reaches a significantly wider circle of people, including
both individuals with various psychological deviations and
POLITICAL PONEROLOGY
217
those who are frustrated, deprived of the opportunity to earn an
education and make use of their talents, physically or morally
injured, or simply primitive. The scope of the response to this
call may vary in proportion, but nowhere will it represent the
majority. Nonetheless, the home-bred spellbinders who arise
never take into account the fact that they are not able to enrap-
ture the majority. 103
Various nations’ different degrees of resistance to this activ-
ity depend upon many factors, such as prosperity and its equi-
table distribution, the society’s educational level (especially
that of the poorer classes), the proportion of participation of
individuals who are primitive or have various deviations, and
the current phase of the hysteroidal cycle. Some nations have
developed immunity as a result of more direct contact with the
phenomenon, something we shall discuss in the next chapter.
In countries just emerging from primeval conditions and
lacking political experience, an appropriately elaborated revo-
lutionary doctrine reaches its society’s autonomous substratum
and finds people who treat it like ideational reality. This also
occurs in nations where an over-egoistical ruling class defends
its position by means of naively moralizing doctrines, where
injustice is rampant, or where an intensification of the hysteria
level stifles the operation of common sense. People who have
become accustomed to revolutionary catchwords no longer
watch to make sure that whoever expounds such an ideology is
a truly sincere adherent, and not just someone using the mask
of ideology to conceal other motives derived from his deviant
personality.