sometimes left behind by an inflammation of the parotid glands
(the mumps). This disease entails brain reactions in some cases,
leaving behind a discreet but permanent bleaching of feelings
and a slight decrease in general mental skills. Similar results
are sometimes left behind after diphtheria. As a result, such
people easily succumb to the suggestions and manipulations of
a more clever individuals.
When drawn into a felonious group, these constitutionally
weakened individuals become faint-critical helpers and execu-
tors of the leader’s intentions, tools in the hands of more
treacherous, usually psychopathic, leaders. Once arrested, they
submit to their leaders’ insinuated explanations that the higher
(paramoral) group ideal demands that they become scapegoats,
taking the majority of blame upon themselves. In court, the
same leaders who initiated the delinquencies mercilessly dump
all the blame onto their less crafty colleagues. Sometimes a
judge actually accepts the insinuations.
Individuals with the above-mentioned post-mumps and
post-diphtheria traits constitute less than 1.0 % of the popula-
tion as a whole, but their share reaches 1/4 of juvenile delin-
quent groups. This represents an inspissation75 of the order of
30-fold, requiring no further methods of statistical analysis.
When studying the contents of ponerogenic unions skillfully
enough, we often meet with an inspissation of other psycho-
logical anomalies which also speak for themselves.
~~~
Two basic types of the above-mentioned unions should be
differentiated:
75 To thicken by either evaporation or absorption of fluid. Diminished fluid-
ity, increased thickness. A concentration. [Editor’s note.]
160
PONEROLOGY
abnormal members were active from the very beginning, play-
ing the role of crystallizing catalysts as early as the process of
creation of the group occurred. We shall call secondarily
ponerogenic a union which was founded in the name of some
idea with an independent social meaning, generally
comprehensible within the categories of the natural world view,
but which later succumbed to a certain moral degeneration.
This in turn opened the door to infection and activation of the
pathological factors within, and later to a ponerization of the
group as a whole, or often of its fraction.
From the very outset, a primarily ponerogenic union is a
foreign body within the organism of society, its character col-
liding with the moral values held or respected by the majority.
The activities of such groups provoke opposition and disgust
and are considered immoral; as a rule, therefore, such groups
do not spread large, nor do they metastasize into numerous
unions; they finally lose their battle with society.
In order to have a chance to develop into a large ponero-
genic association, however, it suffices that some human orga-
nization, characterized by social or political goals and an ideol-
ogy with some creative value, be accepted by a larger number
of normal people
genic malignancy. The primary tradition and ideological values
of such a society may then, for a long time, protect a union
which has succumbed to the ponerization process from the
awareness of society, especially its less critical components.
When the ponerogenic process touches such a human organiza-
tion, which originally emerged and acted in the name of politi-
cal or social goals, and whose causes were conditioned in his-
tory and the social situation, the original group’s primary val-
ues will nourish and protect such a union, in spite of the fact
that those primary values succumb to characteristic degenera-
tion, the practical function becoming
the primary one, because the names and symbols are retained.
This is where the weaknesses of individual and social “com-
mon sense” are revealed.76
76 Just because a group operates under the banner of “communism” or “so-
cialism” or “democracy” or “conservatism” or “republicanism”, doesn’t mean
POLITICAL PONEROLOGY
161
This is reminiscent of a situation psychopathologists know
well: a person who enjoyed trust and respect in their circles
starts behaving with preposterous arrogance and hurting others,
allegedly in the name of his already known, decent and ac-
cepted convictions, which have – in the meantime - deterio-
rated due to some psychological process rendering them primi-
tive but emotionally dynamic. However, his old acquaintances
– having known him for long as the person he was - do not
believe the injured parties who complain about his new, or