Such a person is forced by some internal causes to make an
early choice between two possibilities: the first is forcing other
people to think and experience things in a manner similar to his
own; the second is a feeling of being lonely and different, a
pathological misfit in social life. Sometimes the choice is either
snake-charming or suicide.
Triumphant repression of self-critical or unpleasant con-
cepts from the field of consciousness gradually gives rise to the
phenomena of conversion thinking, or paralogistics, paramoral-
isms, and the use of reversion blockades. They stream so pro-
fusely from the mind and mouth of the spellbinder that they
flood the average person’s mind. Everything becomes subordi-
nated to the spellbinder’s over-compensatory conviction that
they are exceptional, sometimes even messianic. An ideology
emerges from this conviction, true in part, whose value is sup-
posedly superior. However, if we analyze the exact functions of
such an ideology in the spellbinder’s personality, we perceive
that it is a nothing other than a means of
for repressing those tormenting self-critical associations into
the subconscious. The ideology’s instrumental role in influenc-
ing other people also serves the spellbinder’s needs.
The spellbinder believes that he will always find converts to
his ideology, and most often, they are right. However, they feel
shock (or even paramoral indignation) when it turns out that
their influence extends to only a limited minority, while most
people’s attitude to their activities remains critical, pained and
156
PONEROLOGY
disturbed. The spellbinder is thus confronted with a choice:
either withdraw back into his void or strengthen his position by
The spellbinder places on a high moral plane anyone who
has succumbed to his influence and incorporated the experien-
tial method he imposes. He showers such people with attention
and property, if possible. Critics are met with “moral” outrage.
It can even be proclaimed that the compliant minority is in fact
the moral majority, since it professes the best ideology and
honors a leader whose qualities are above average.
Such activity is always necessarily characterized by the
psychological point of view because its substratum contains
pathological phenomena, and both spellbinding and self-
charming make it impossible to perceive reality accurately
enough to foresee results logically. However, spellbinders nur-
ture great optimism and harbor visions of future triumphs simi-
lar to those they enjoyed over their own crippled souls.
In a healthy society, the activities of spellbinders meet with
criticism effective enough to stifle them quickly. However,
when they are preceded by conditions operating destructively
upon common sense and social order; such as social injustice,
cultural backwardness, or intellectually limited rulers some-
times manifesting pathological traits, spellbinders’ activities
have led entire societies into large-scale human tragedy.
Such an individual fishes an environment or society for
people amenable to his influence, deepening their psychologi-
cal weaknesses until they finally join together in a ponerogenic
union. On the other hand, people who have maintained their
healthy critical faculties intact, based upon their own common
sense and moral criteria, attempt to counteract the spellbinders’
activities and their results. In the resulting
cial attitudes, each side justifies itself by means of moral cate-
gories. That is why such commonsense resistance is always
accompanied by some feeling of helplessness and deficiency of
criteria.
The awareness that a spellbinder is always a pathological
individual should protect us from the known results of a moral-
POLITICAL PONEROLOGY
157
izing interpretation of pathological phenomena, ensuring us
kind of pathological substratum is hidden behind a given in-
stance of spellbinding activities should enable a modern solu-
tion to such situations.
It is a characteristic phenomenon that a high IQ generally
helps a person to be more immune to spellbinding activities
of human attitudes to the influence of such activities should be
attributed to other properties of human nature. The most deci-
sive factor in assuming a critical attitude is good basic intelli-