our bones. We would think of questions: why did people lose
all their humanity, what was the reason for all this? Some sort
38
INTRODUCTION
of apprehensive premonition choked its way into our young
minds; unfortunately, it was to come true in the future.
~~~
If a collection were to be made of all those books which de-
scribe the horrors of wars, the cruelties of revolutions, and the
bloody deeds of political leaders and their systems, many read-
ers would avoid such a library. Ancient works would be placed
alongside books by contemporary historians and reporters. The
documentary treatises on German extermination and concentra-
tion camps, and of the extermination of the Jewish Nation,
furnish approximate statistical data and describe the well-
organized “labor” of the destruction of human life, using a
properly calm language, and providing a concrete basis for the
acknowledgement of the nature of evil.
The autobiography of Rudolf Hoess, the commander of
camps in Oswiecim (
classic example of how an intelligent psychopathic individual
with a deficit of human emotion thinks and feels.
Foremost among these would be books written by witnesses
to criminal insanity such as Arthur Koestler’s
sonal memories of Severina Szmaglewska5 from the Oswiecim
German concentration camp for women;
Soviet memoires of Gustav Herling-Grudzinski6; and the Solz-
henitsyn volumes turgid with human suffering.
The collection would include works on the philosophy of
history discussing the social and moral aspects of the genesis of
evil, but they would also use the half-mysterious laws of his-
tory to partly justify the blood-stained solutions. However, an
5 Szmaglewska, Seweryna, 1916-92, writer; 1942-45 prisoner in Nazi con-
centration camps; wrote
witness at Nuremberg Trial; stories and novels mainly concerned with war
and occupation:
1960),
for young people; anthology of memoirs 1939-45:
Bars, 1964). [Editor’s note.]
6 Herling-Grudzinski, Gustav: Polish writer who after WWII lived in Napoli,
Italy. Married the daughter of well known Italian philosopher Benedetto
Croce. He wrote an account of his time in a Soviet gulag:
[Editor’s note.]
POLITICAL PONEROLOGY
39
alert reader would be able to detect a certain degree of evolu-
tion in the authors’ attitudes, from an ancient affirmation of
primitive enslavement and murder of vanquished peoples, to
the present-day moralizing condemnation of such methods of
behavior.
Such a library would nevertheless be missing a single work
offering a sufficient explanation of the causes and processes
whereby such historical dramas originate, of how and why
human frailties and ambitions degenerate into bloodthirsty
madness. Upon reading the present volume, the reader will
realize that writing such a book was scientifically impossible
until recently.
The old questions would remain unanswered: what made
this happen? Does everyone carry the seeds of crime within, or
is it only some of us? No matter how faithful and psychologi-
cally true, no literary description of occurrences, such as those
narrated by the above-mentioned authors, can answer these
questions, nor can they fully explain the origins of evil. They
are thus incapable of furnishing sufficiently effective principles
for counter-acting evil. The best literary description of a dis-
ease cannot produce an understanding of its essential etiology,
and thus furnishes no principles for treatment. In the same way,
such descriptions of historical tragedies are unable to elaborate
effective measures for counteracting the genesis, existence, or
spread of evil.
In using natural7 language to circumscribe psychological,
social, and moral concepts which cannot properly be described
within its sphere of utility, we produce a sort of surrogate com-
prehension leading to a nagging suspicion of helplessness. Our
natural system of concepts and imaginings is not equipped with
the necessary factual content to permit reasoned comprehen-
sion of the quality of the factors (particularly the psychological
ones) which were active before the birth of, and during, such
inhumanly cruel times
We must nevertheless point out that the authors of such lit-
erary descriptions sensed that their language was insufficient
and therefore attempted to infuse their words with the proper
7 Ordinary, everyday words which have various meanings, generally benign,