eras. People with a humanistic education may therefore get the
impression that they have achieved wisdom. We shall also
ultimate realities of Sankhya philosophy. The divine Self, the absolute Real-
ity, pure Consciousness. [Editor’s note.]
10
development of an organism from the fertilized egg to its mature form. On-
togeny is studied in developmental biology. [Editor’s note.]
POLITICAL PONEROLOGY
53
continue to respect the wisdom of that “common sense” de-
rived from life experience and reflections thereon.
However, a conscientious psychologist must ask the follow-
ing questions: Even if the natural world view has been refined,
does it mirror reality with sufficient reliability? Or does it only
mirror
upon it as a basis for decision making in the individual, societal
and political spheres of life?
Experience teaches us, first of all, that this natural world
view has permanent and characteristic tendencies toward de-
formation dictated by our instinctive and emotional features.
Secondly, our work exposes us to many phenomena which
cannot be understood nor described by natural language alone.
An objective scientific language able to analyze the essence of
a phenomenon thus becomes an indispensable tool. It has also
shown itself to be similarly indispensable for an understanding
of the questions presented within this book.
Now, having laid the groundwork, let us attempt a listing of
the most important
insufficiencies of the natural human world view.
Those emotional features which are a natural component of
the human personality are never completely appropriate to the
reality being experienced. This results both from our instinct
and from our common errors of upbringing. That is why the
best tradition of philosophical and religious thought have coun-
seled subduing the emotions in order to achieve a more accu-
rate view of reality.
The natural world view is also characterized by a similar,
emotional, tendency to endow our opinions with moral judg-
ment, often so negative as to represent outrage. This appeals to
tendencies which are deeply rooted in human nature and socie-
tal customs. We easily extrapolate this method of comprehen-
sion onto manifestations of improper human behavior, which
are, in fact, caused by minor psychological deficiencies. When
another individual behaves in a way that we deem to be “bad”,
we tend to make a judgment of negative intent rather than seek-
ing to understand the psychological conditions that might be
driving them, and convincing them that they are, in fact, behav-
ing very properly. Thus, any moralizing interpretation of minor
54
SOME INDESPENSIBLE CONCEPTS
psychopathological phenomena is erroneous and merely leads
to an exceptional number of unfortunate consequences, which
is why we shall repeatedly refer to it.
Another defect of the natural world view is its lack of uni-
versality. In every society, a certain percentage of the people
has developed a world view a good deal different from that
used by the majority. The causes of the aberrations are by no
means qualitatively monolithic; we will be discussing them in
greater detail in the fourth chapter.
Another essential deficiency of the natural world view is its
limited scope of applicability. Euclidean geometry would suf-
fice for a technical reconstruction of our world and for a trip to
the moon and the closest planets. We only need a geometry
whose axioms are less natural if we reach inside of an atom or
outside of our solar system. The average person does not en-
counter phenomena for which Euclidean geometry would be
insufficient. Sometime during his lifetime, virtually every per-
son is faced with problems he must deal with. Since a compre-
hension of the truly operational factors is beyond the ken of his
natural world view, he generally relies on emotion: intuition
and the pursuit of happiness. Whenever we meet a person
whose individual world view developed under the influence of
non-typical conditions, we tend to pass moral judgment upon
him in the name of our more typical world view. In short,
whenever some unidentified psychopathological factor comes
into play, the natural human world view ceases to be applica-
ble.
Moving further, we often meet with sensible people en-
dowed with a well-developed natural world view as regards
psychological, societal, and moral aspects, frequently refined
via literary influences, religious deliberations, and philosophi-
cal reflections. Such persons have a pronounced tendency to
overrate the values of their world view, behaving as though it
were an objective basis for judging other people. They do not